Upaya Meningkatkan Readiness To Change: Peran Proactive Personality, Perceived Management Support For Change Dan High Performance Work System

Authors

  • Ni Nyoman Oktapiani Universitas Esa Unggul
  • Rina Mutiara Universitas Esa Unggul
  • Johanes Universitas Esa Unggul

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/dhps.v4i1.3826

Keywords:

High Performance Work System, Proactive Personality, Readiness To Change, Perceived Management Support For Change

Abstract

The procurement of medicines and medical consumables is a fundamental component of healthcare service management, demanding efficiency regarding budget, timeliness, quantity, and quality. However, complex challenges—such as limited local suppliers, price fluctuations, and constrained capacity among pharmaceutical logistics personnel—can potentially hinder distribution and compromise the quality of hospital services. This study aims to analyze the influence of High-Performance Work Systems (HPWS) and Proactive Personality on the Readiness to Change of employees at Mangusada Regional Capital with Perceived Management Support for Change serving as a mediating variable. An explanatory quantitative approach was employed. Using a purposive sampling technique, data were collected from 138 respondents via questionnaires and analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with a Partial Least Squares (PLS) approach. The results indicate that High-Performance Work Systems do not influence Readiness to Change, whereas Proactive Personality does. High-Performance Work Systems influence Perceived Management Support for Change, but Proactive Personality does not. Perceived Management Support for Change influences Readiness to Change. Furthermore, Perceived Management Support for Change mediates the influence of High-Performance Work Systems on Readiness to Change, but it does not mediate the influence of Proactive Personality on Readiness to Change.

References

Ahmed, F., Qin, Y. J., & Martínez, L. (2019). Sustainable change management through employee readiness: Decision support system adoption in technology-intensive British e-businesses. Sustainability, 11(11), 2998.

Aldabbas, H., Pinnington, A., & Lahrech, A. (2023). The influence of perceived organizational support on employee creativity: The mediating role of work engagement. Current Psychology, 42(8), 6501–6515.

Appelbaum, E. (2000). Manufacturing Advantage: Why High-performance Work Systems Pay Off. Cornell University Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=5o6YFbskCAcC

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1986(23–28).

Bateman, T. S., & Crant, J. M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14(2), 103–118.

Belwalkar, B. B., & Tobacyk, J. J. (2018). Toward a tripartite model and measurement of proactive personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100(5), 529–538.

Bouckenooghe, D., Devos, G., & Van den Broeck, H. (2009). Organizational change questionnaire-climate of change, processes and readiness (OCQ-C, P, R): development of a new instrument.

Boxall, P. F., & Purcell, J. (2003). Strategy and human resource management (Vol. 408). Palgrave Macmillan Basingstoke.

Chen, S.-T., & Haga, K. Y. A. (2022). The influence of differential leadership and proactive personality on employee in-role performance: An integrated model. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 978495.

De Clercq, D., & Pereira, R. (2023). Proactive champions: how personal and organizational resources enable proactive personalities to become idea champions. The Journal of Social Psychology, 163(5), 583–604.

Deng, J., Cheng, Z., Qi, S., & Deng, R. (2023). Unravelling the relationship between perceived values-congruence with organizational change readiness: A moderated mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1086326.

Domorenok, E., Graziano, P., & Polverari, L. (2021). Introduction: Policy integration and institutional capacity: Theoretical, conceptual and empirical challenges. In Policy and Society (Vol. 40, Number 1, pp. 1–18). Oxford University Press.

Duradoni, M., Valdrighi, G., Donati, A., Fiorenza, M., Puddu, L., & Guazzini, A. (2024). Development and validation of the readiness to change scale (RtC) for sustainability. Sustainability, 16(11), 4519.

Eisenberger, R., & Stinglhamber, F. (2011). Perceived organizational support: Fostering enthusiastic and productive employees. American Psychological Association.

Emur, A. P., Mufidawati, H., Andryadi, M. F., Pusparini, E. S., & Rachmawati, R. (2023). The Role of Psychological Capital on the Effect of High-Performance Work System and Proactive Personality on Job Performance. Jurnal Manajemen Teori Dan Terapan, 16(3), 636.

Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program IBS SPSS 25 (9th ed.). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Gigliotti, R., Vardaman, J., Marshall, D. R., & Gonzalez, K. (2019). The role of perceived organizational support in individual change readiness. Journal of Change Management, 19(2), 86–100.

Groenewegen, J. (1996). Transaction cost economics and beyond: why and how? In Transaction cost economics and beyond (pp. 1–9). Springer.

Hair, J., Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). SAGE Publications. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=AVMzEAAAQBAJ

Han, H., Umar Daihani, D., & Arafah, W. (2022). The Effect of Strategic Leadership, Organizational Identification, Perceived Organizational Support, Communication on Readiness of Changes and the Impact on Commitment to Change. JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, FINANCE AND MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 05. https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v5-i12-09

Haqq, Z. N., Nurhayati, N., Sharom, N. Q., & Ismail, F. L. M. (2021). Linking perceived supervisory support and self-efficacy for change to individual readiness for change. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Manajemen, 8(2), 392–404.

Kebede, S., & Wang, A. (2022). Organizational justice and employee readiness for change: the mediating role of perceived organizational support. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 806109.

Khan, H. S. ud din, Chughtai, M. S., Ma, Z., Li, M., & He, D. (2024). Adaptive leadership and safety citizenship behaviors in Pakistan: the roles of readiness to change, psychosocial safety climate, and proactive personality. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, 1298428.

Kim, H., Seo, K., & Jang, T. (2022). Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the high-performance work system scale (HPWS-K). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(20), 13708.

Machali, I. (2021). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif (Panduan Praktis Merencanakan, Melaksanakan, dan Analisis dalam Penelitian Kuantitatif). Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Sunan Kalijaga.

Maduratna, E. S., Judijanto, L., Wasita, R. R. R., Irawan, Y. G., Wiradani, N. L. K., & Sitepu, F. B. (2025). Manajemen dan administrasi pelayanan kesehatan. PT. Green Pustaka Indonesia.

Mangusada, R. (2025). Buku Profil. RSD Mangusada.

Narbariya, S., Nayeem, M. A., & Gupta, R. (2022). Does HPWS amplify employees’ change readiness for digital transformation? A study through the “work-from-anywhere” prism. Personnel Review, 51(8), 1948–1966.

Naseer, S., Chughtai, M. S., & Syed, F. (2023). Do high-performance work practices promote an individual’s readiness and commitment to change? The moderating role of adaptive leadership. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 36(6), 899–916.

Ni, Y., Li, L., Bao, Y., You, G., & Li, J. (2024). Relationship between perceived organisational support, self-efficacy, proactive personality and career self-management among nurses: A moderated mediation analysis. BMJ Open, 14(6), e081334.

Noviaristanti, S. (2022). Contemporary Research on Business and Management: Proceedings of the International Seminar of Contemporary Research on Business and Management (ISCRBM 2020), 25-27 November 2020, Surabaya, Indonesia. Taylor & Francis.

Paauwe, J. (2004). HRM and Performance: Achieving Long-term Viability. Oxford University Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=8ApUw5zfX_0C

Parker, S. K., & Turner, N. (2002). Work design and individual work performance: Research findings and an agenda for future inquiry. Psychological Management of Individual Performance, 69–93.

Pasolong, H. (2022). Teori Administrasi Publik (Cetakan ke). Alfabeta.

Rosari, R., Danarilia, V. O., Ardianto, H., Wicaksana, R. S., & Sujono, R. I. (2025). Shaping the Shift: Unpacking Uncertainties in Transformational Leadership for Organizational Change. Global Business & Finance Review, 30(1), 70.

Rubel, M. R. B., Hung Kee, D. M., & Rimi, N. N. (2021). High-performance work practices and medical professionals’ work outcomes: the mediating effect of perceived organizational support. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 18(3), 368–391.

Susita, D., Parimita, W., Murdiono, J., Hamidi, D. Z., Diani, R. D., Rahadian, M. I., & Junaidi, M. N. (2025). Teori manajemen SDM dalam pengelolaan kinerja. Penerbit Widina.

Tan, F. C., & Nadarajah, D. (2021). Adaptability features, proactivity, and change readiness: An empirical investigation of public sector organisations. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 11(1), 8596.

Tanujaya, B., Prahmana, R. C. I., & Mumu, J. (2022). Likert scale in social sciences research: Problems and difficulties. FWU Journal of Social Sciences, 16(4), 89–101.

Veseli, A., Hasanaj, P., & Bajraktari, A. (2025). Perceptions of organizational change readiness for sustainable digital transformation: Insights from learning management system projects in higher education institutions. Sustainability, 17(2), 619.

Wang, C.-J., & Jiang, Z.-R. (2024). Exploring high-performance work systems and sustainable development in the hospitality industry. Sustainability, 16(22), 10019.

Yuan, X., & Xie, L. (2022). High-performance work system and employee creativity. 2022 International Conference on Creative Industry and Knowledge Economy (CIKE 2022), 574–579.

Zaura, D. M., & Riasnugrahani, M. (2023). Transformational Leadership dan Readiness to Change: Model Mediasi dengan Proactive Personality. Personifikasi: Jurnal Ilmu Psikologi, 14(1), 47–59.

Zhao, X., Lynch Jr, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197–206.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-30

How to Cite

Ni Nyoman Oktapiani, Rina Mutiara, & Johanes. (2026). Upaya Meningkatkan Readiness To Change: Peran Proactive Personality, Perceived Management Support For Change Dan High Performance Work System. Dinasti Health and Pharmacy Science, 4(1), 92–106. https://doi.org/10.38035/dhps.v4i1.3826

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Dinasti Health and Pharmacy Science (July - September 2026)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Ni Nyoman Oktapiani, Rina Mutiara, Johanes

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright :

Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:

  1. Copyright in each article belongs to the author.
  2. The author acknowledges that the DHPS has the right to be the first to publish under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International CC BY 4.0).
  3. Authors can submit articles separately, arrange the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal to other versions (for example, sent to the author's institutional repository, publication in a book, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time at DHPS.