Manajemen Kebijakan Fiskal: Strategi Penetapan Kosmetik sebagai Objek Cukai

Authors

  • Mohammad Fachrudin Politeknik Keuangan Negara STAN
  • Fauzan Muttaqien Institut Teknologi dan Bisnis Widya Gama Lumajang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jafm.v5i5.1188

Keywords:

Cosmetic Tax, Harmful Chemicals, Excise Tax, Parabens, Sulfates

Abstract

: The rapid growth of the cosmetics industry has raised concerns about health and environmental risks from chemicals like parabens and Sodium Lauryl Sulfate (SLS). Parabens disrupt endocrine functions, potentially causing hormonal imbalances and cancer, while SLS contributes to skin irritation and environmental pollution. This study examines the feasibility of imposing excise taxes on cosmetics containing these substances, using a descriptive qualitative approach that considers philosophical, legal, socio-economic, and operational aspects. The findings indicate that cosmetics with parabens and SLS are viable candidates for excise taxation. Philosophically, this aligns with the Pigouvian principle of internalizing social and environmental costs. Legally, these products qualify as excisable goods under existing laws. Socio-economically, excise taxes increase product prices, reducing consumption and encouraging a shift to safer alternatives. Producers are incentivized to use eco-friendly materials. International examples, such as the EU and ASEAN regulations on parabens, show the success of such policies. Operationally, technologies like blockchain can enhance supply chain transparency, while digital labeling informs consumers. Excise revenues could support health programs, environmental restoration, and research into safer ingredients. These measures would reduce risks and promote sustainable industry practices. The government should invest in surveillance and allocate excise revenues to maximize societal benefits.

References

Amin, M. M., Tabatabaeian, M., Chavoshani, A., et al. (2019). Paraben content in adjacent normal-malignant breast tissues from women with breast cancer. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 32(12), 893–904.

Asio, J. R. G., Garcia, J. S., Antonatos, C., et al. (2023). Sodium lauryl sulfate and its potential impacts on organisms and the environment: A thematic analysis. Emerging Contaminants, 9(1), 100205.

Azzi, R., Chamoun, R. K., & Sokhn, M. (2019). The power of a blockchain-based supply chain. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 135, 582–592.

Bird, R. M., & Jun, J. (2005). Earmarking in theory and Korean practice. ITP Paper, 513(3), 1–53.

Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan (BPOM). (2019). Peraturan BPOM No. 23 Tahun 2019 tentang Pengawasan Obat dan Makanan. Jakarta: BPOM.

Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan (BPOM). (2022). Peraturan BPOM No. 17 Tahun 2022 tentang Pedoman Teknis Cara Pembuatan Obat yang Baik. Jakarta: BPOM.

B??dzka, D., Gromadzi?ska, J., & W?sowicz, W. (2014). Parabens: From environmental studies to human health. Environment International, 67, 27–42.

Cashin, C., Sparkes, S., & Bloom, D. (2017). Earmarking for health: From theory to practice (No. WHO/HIS/HGF/HFWorkingPaper/17.5). World Health Organization.

Cathey, A. L., Nguyen, V. K., Colacino, J. A., et al. (2023). Exploratory profiles of phenols, parabens, and per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances among NHANES study participants. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, 33(5), 687–698.

Chaloupka, F. J., Powell, L. M., & Warner, K. E. (2019). The use of excise taxes to reduce tobacco, alcohol, and sugary beverage consumption. Annual Review of Public Health, 40(1), 187–201.

Chang, S. E., & Chen, Y. (2020). When blockchain meets supply chain: A systematic literature review on current development and potential applications. IEEE Access, 8, 62478–62494.

Darbre, P. D., & Harvey, P. W. (2014). Parabens can enable hallmarks and characteristics of cancer in human breast epithelial cells. Journal of Applied Toxicology, 34(9), 925–938.

Fachrudin, M. (2018). Analisis fisibilitas minuman berpemanis sebagai obyek cukai dan penerapan pemungutannya di Indonesia. In Proseding Seminar Nasional Akuntansi (Vol. 1, No. 1).

Fachrudin, M. (2023). Kebijakan fiskal di era digital: Analisis penerapan cukai pada digital games. Co-Value Jurnal Ekonomi Koperasi dan Kewirausahaan, 14(7), 957–967.

Hager, E., Chen, J., & Zhao, L. (2022). Minireview: parabens exposure and breast cancer. International journal of environmental research and public health, 19(3), 1873.

Kristiaji, B. B., & Yustisia, D. (1919). Komparasi objek cukai secara global dan pelajaran bagi Indonesia. DDTC Working Paper.

Levell, P., O’Connell, M., & Smith, K. (2016). The sugary drinks tax: Response from the Institute for Fiscal Studies. The Lancet, 387(10031), 1907–1908. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30346-6.

Löffler, H., Aramaki, J., & Effendy, I. (2002). The influence of body mass index on skin susceptibility to sodium lauryl sulphate. Skin Research and Technology, 8(1), 19–22.

Natisah, N. (2024). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Keputusan Re-Buying Produk Skincare Lokal pada Mahasiswi Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon (Doctoral dissertation, S1 Ekonomi Syariah IAIN Syekh Nurjati).

Precendence Research. (2022). Cosmetics market. Retrieved from https://www.precedenceresearch.com/cosmetics-market.

Sarink, D., Franke, A. A., White, K. K., Wu, A. H., Cheng, I., Quon, B., ... & Merritt, M. A. (2021). BPA, parabens, and phthalates in relation to endometrial cancer risk: a case–control study nested in the multiethnic cohort. Environmental Health Perspectives, 129(5), 057702.

Velasquez, K., Ivie, A., Fegely, S. R., Raffoul, A., Vitagliano, J. A., Roberto, C. A., & Austin, S. B. (2022). Dietary supplements for weight loss: Legal basis for excise tax and other government action to protect consumers from a public health menace. American Journal of Law & Medicine, 48(1), 38–53.

World Health Organization. (2016). Earmarked tobacco taxes: Lessons learnt from nine countries. World Health Organization.

World Health Organization. (2017). Earmarking for health: From theory to practice. World Health Organization.

https://www.statista.com/outlook/cmo/beauty-personal-care/cosmetics/indonesia

https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Annex-VI_Release_15112021.docx.pdf

https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/taxation/consumption-tax-trends-2022_6525a942-en

Published

2024-12-25

How to Cite

Fachrudin, M., & Muttaqien, F. (2024). Manajemen Kebijakan Fiskal: Strategi Penetapan Kosmetik sebagai Objek Cukai. Journal of Accounting and Finance Management, 5(5), 1214–1228. https://doi.org/10.38035/jafm.v5i5.1188

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.