Digital Payment Acceptance in Higher Education: A Technology Acceptance Model Analysis from an Accounting Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/dar.v4i1.3525Keywords:
accounting, actual system use, digital transaction, e-wallet, technology acceptance modelAbstract
The digitalization of payment systems has driven a significant shift in financial transaction behaviour, including within higher education environments. This study aims to analyse the factors influencing the actual use of e-wallets in a university canteen using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) framework, while examining the implications from an accounting perspective. Unlike prior TAM studies that predominantly measure behavioural intention, this study distinctively examines Actual System Use (ASU) as the dependent variable and explicitly connects e-wallet adoption to internal control and financial documentation quality at the operational level, addressing a gap rarely investigated within vocational higher education canteens. A quantitative survey approach was employed, targeting students of Politeknik Negeri Malang who had previously transacted using e-wallets in the campus canteen. Data were analysed using multiple linear regression. Findings indicate that Perceived Usefulness and Attitude Toward Using positively and significantly affect Actual System Use, while Perceived Ease of Use shows no significant effect. Simultaneously, all three TAM variables collectively influence actual e-wallet usage. From an accounting perspective, these findings carry important implications: a higher rate of e-wallet adoption in campus canteen settings has the potential to improve the quality of automatic financial transaction recording, strengthen internal controls, and support the transparency and accountability of operational cash flows. Users' positive attitudes toward digital payment technology proved to be the dominant factor driving actual use, which indirectly contributes to more reliable audit trails compared to cash transactions. This study extends the application of TAM to the operational accounting context of higher education institutions and offers recommendations for institutional managers seeking to promote digital payment adoption as part of improved financial governance.
References
Abdinur, M. A., & Karcioglu, R. (2023). Factors Affecting the Adoption of Accounting Information System in Small Medium Enterprises in Somalia. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 13(1), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARAFMS
Appelbaum, D., Kogan, A., Vasarhelyi, M., & Yan, Z. (2017). Impact of business analytics and enterprise systems on managerial accounting. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 25(March), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2017.03.003
Bank Indonesia. (2023a). Laporan Tahunan Layanan Informasi Publik. https://www.bi.go.id/id/informasi-publik/laporan/Documents/Laporan-Layanan-Informasi-Publik-Tahun-2023.pdf
Bank Indonesia. (2023b). MDR QRIS Bagi Merchant: Kategorisasi dan Simulasi. https://www.bi.go.id/id/publikasi/ruang-media/cerita-bi/Pages/mdr-qris.aspx
Chauhan, S. (2015). Acceptance of Mobile Money by Poor Citizens of India: Integrating Trust Into the Technology Acceptance Model. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 17(3), 58–68. https://doi.org/10.1108/info-02-2015-0018
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (Fifth Edit). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Gomber, P., Kauffman, R. J., Parker, C., & Weber, B. W. (2018). On the Fintech Revolution: Interpreting the Forces of Innovation, Disruption and Transformation in Financial Services. Journal of Management Information System, 35(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2018.1440766
Gusni, Nurriyati, R., & Dirgantara, P. D. (2020). Pengaruh Perceived Usefulness dan Perceived Ease of Use terhadap Attitude dan Actual Usage Go-Pay. Jurnal Manajemen & Kewirausahaan, 8(1), 22–33. https://doi.org/10.26905/jmdk.v8i1.3892
Hair Jr., J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Hartono, Tjong, W., & Jony. (2023). Pengaruh Technology Acceptance Model Terhadap Intention to Use Dengan Kinerja Sebagai Variabel Moderasi Dalam Menggunakan Sistem Informasi Akuntansi. Owner: Riset & Jurnal Akuntansi, 7(2), 1815–1830. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v7i2.1583
Herath, T., & Herath, H. S. B. (2020). Coping with the New Normal Imposed by the COVID-19 Pandemic: Lessons for Technology Management and Governance. Information Systems Management, 37(4), 277–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2020.1818902
Hidayati, L. W., & Nafidah, L. N. (2023). Dampak Sistem Pembayaran QRIS Terhadap Peningkatan Akuntabilitas Dimediasi Pencatatan Laporan Keuangan. Behavioral Accounting Journal, 6(2), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.33005/baj.v6i2.367
Indriyani, R., Widyastuti, U., & Yusuf, M. (2024). Analisis Penggunaan Digital Payment: Modifikasi Teori. Jurnal Masharif Al-Syariah: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Perbankan Syariah, 9(3), 1678–1692. https://doi.org/10.30651/jms.v9i3.22988
Karomi, S., & Purwanto, E. (2024). Pengaruh Theory Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Spontan pada Pengguna Shopee Paylater di Kabupaten Sumenep. Jurnal MISSY (Management and Business Strategy), 5(1), 23–33.
Marlina, L., Mundzir, A., & Pratama, H. (2021). Cashless dan Cardless sebagai Perilaku Transaksi di Era Digital: Suatu Tinjauan Teoritis dan Empiris. Jurnal Co Management, 3, 533–542. https://doi.org/10.32670/comanagement.v3i2.424
Martins, C., Oliveira, T., & Popovič, A. (2014). Understanding the Internet Banking Adoption: a Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology and Perceived Risk Application. International Journal of Information Management, 34(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.06.002
Mehta, C. R., & Patel, N. R. (1989). IBM SPSS Exact Tests. IBM Corp.
Meiranto, W., Abbad, T. A. S., Ramadhan, A. F., & Marsono, M. (2026). Determinants of E-Wallet Adoption Among Generation Z in Indonesia: An Extended UTAUT3 Model Integrating Personal Innovativeness and Perceived Security. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 19(6), 421. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm19060421
Mulyana, A., & Wijaya, H. (2018). Perancangan E-Payment System pada E-Wallet Menggunakan Kode QR Berbasis Android E-Payment System Design in E-Wallet Using Android-Based on QR Codes. Komputika: Jurnal Sistem Komputer, 7(2), 63–69. https://doi.org/10.34010/komputika.v7i2.1511
Nashrullah, M., Maharani, O., Rohman, A., Fahyuni, E. F., Nurdyansyah, & Untari, R. S. (2023). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan (Prosedur Penelitian, Subyek Penelitian, dan Pengembangan Teknik Pengumpulan Data) (M. T. Multazam (ed.)). UMSIDA Press.
Nugroho, A. P., & Pramudita, K. (2023). Determinan Penggunaan E-Wallet di Kalangan Mahasiswa Yogyakarta. Asian Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 07(02), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.20885/ajie.vol7.iss2.art1
Putri, N. P. A. R. T., Putri, I. G. A. P. D., & Utami, N. W. (2024). Analisis Faktor yang Memengaruhi Minat Pengguna E-wallet DANA dengan Metode Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) di Bali. JIPI (Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran Informatika), 9(4), 2146–2161. https://doi.org/10.29100/jipi.v9i4.5605
Rachman, A., Julianti, N., & Arkoyah, S. (2024). Challenges and Opportunities for QRIS Implementation as a Digital Payment System in Indonesia. EkBis: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 8(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.14421/EkBis.2024.8.1.2134
Ramadan, C. S., & Efnita, Y. (2024). Pengaruh Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Terhadap Customer Satisfaction dalam Bertransaksi Menggunakan Layanan Mobile Payment DANA. Al Qalam: Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan Dan Kemasyarakatan, 18(1), 193–209. https://doi.org/10.35931/aq.v18i1.2993
Riza, A. A., & Aditya, A. (2025). Evaluating the Impact of Trust and Security on E-Wallet Adoption: Insights from the UTAUT2 Model in Indonesia. Jurnal SimanteC, 13(2), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.21107/simantec.v13i2.29623
Rohman, A., Mukhsin, M., & Ganika, G. (2023). Penggunaan Technology Acceptance Model Dalam Analisis Actual Use Penggunaan E – Commerce Tokopedia Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen Akuntansi Keuangan Bisnis Digital, 2(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.58222/jemakbd.v2i1.150
Sholihah, S. M., Aditiya, N. Y., Evani, E. S., & Maghfiroh, S. (2023). Konsep Uji Asumsi Klasik pada Regresi Linier Berganda. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Soedirman (JRAS), 2(2), 102–110. https://doi.org/10.32424/1.jras.2023.2.2.10792
Siahaan, H. R., & Budihartanti, C. (2023). Analisa Penerimaan Pengguna e-wallet sebagai Transaksi Digital Menggunakan Metode TAM (Technologi Acceptance Model). Journal of Computer Science and Engineering (JCSE), 4(1), 42–49. https://doi.org/10.36596/jcse.v4i1.28
Sugiyono, S. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D (pp. 1–444). Alfabeta Bandung.
The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). (2013). COSO Internal Control – Integrated Framework.
Tyas, E. I., & Darma, E. S. (2017). Pengaruh Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, Perceived Enjoyment, dan Actual Usage Terhadap Penerimaan Teknologi Informasi: Studi Empiris pada Karyawan Bagian Akuntansi dan Keuangan Baitul Maal Wa Tamwil Wilayah Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Reviu Akuntansi Dan Bisnis Indonesia, 1(1), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.18196/rab.010103
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2019). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Wibasuri, A., Rahayu, M., Adi, N. W. C., & Suryawan, I. M. Y. (2022). Minat Individu Terhadap Penggunaan E-wallet Shopee Paylater Berbasis Modified Technology Acceptance Model. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Dan Bisnis, 7(2), 215–227. https://doi.org/10.38043/jimb.v7i2.3950
Widianto, A., & Aryanto. (2018). Kajian Perilaku Pengguna (User) Terhadap Penggunaan Sistem Informasi Industri Kecil Menengah (SI-IKM) Kota Tegal. Jurnal Riset Bisnis Dan Investasi, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.35313/jrbi.v4i1.988
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Fathimatus Zahro Fazda Oktavia, Atik Andhayani, Marlina Magdalena, Yusna Oktavia, Fita Setiati, Yasin Nur Rohim

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright :
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- Copyright in each article belongs to the author.
- The author acknowledges that the DAR has the right to be the first to publish under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal to other versions (for example, sent to the author's institutional repository, publication in a book, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time at DAR.
























