Literature Review on Characterization and Optimization of Protease Enzymes for Medical Applications

Authors

  • Yorasakhi Ananta Universitas Andalas, Padang, Sumatera Barat, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/dhps.v2i2.1824

Keywords:

Protease Enzymes, Microorganisms, Enzyme Characterization, Production Optimization, Medical Applications

Abstract

Protease enzymes are a group of enzymes that play an important role in protein breakdown and have been widely studied for medical applications, especially in the fields of wound healing, cancer therapy, and antimicrobials. This article presents a systematic review of various studies exploring the biochemical characterization and optimization of protease enzyme activity produced by microorganisms. The main focus of this review includes the optimum conditions for enzyme activity, stability to pH and temperature, and genetic engineering and fermentation methods for increasing its production. It was found that thorough characterization is very important in determining the potential for clinical application of protease enzymes. In addition, optimization of enzyme production through fermentation and biotechnology approaches has been shown to increase efficiency and reduce the risk of side effects in medical applications. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the progress and challenges in the development of proteases for use as therapeutic agents.

References

Ahmad, A., Rahman, R., & Ismail, S. (2021). Optimization of protease production from Bacillus subtilis using agro-industrial waste as substrates. Biotechnology Letters, 43(5), 987–996.

Ali, R. (2023). Microbial Protease in Therapeutic Use: A Comprehensive Overview. Journal of Medical Enzymology, 11(2), 145–160.

Ananta, Y., Alamsjah, F., & Agustien, A. (2025). Optimization and molecular identification of PUA-14 bacterial isolate from protease-producing mangrove waters. Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity, 26(1).

Andriani, D., Saputra, A., & Lestari, N. (2023). Synergistic effect of Bacillus subtilis protease and gentamicin on biofilm eradication in infected wounds. Asian Journal of Medical Biology, 8(4), 223–231.

Aziz, H., & Marlina, R. (2022). Effect of immobilization techniques on protease stability for pharmaceutical applications. Indonesian Journal of Biochemistry, 6(2), 77–86.

Chandra, A., & Yuliani, D. (2023). Optimization of protease enzyme from Bacillus subtilis using response surface methodology. Journal of Industrial Microbiology, 13(3), 110–118.

Fitriani, R., & Aziz, M. (2024). Enhanced microbial protease production using CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing on Bacillus strains. Biotech Advances Indonesia, 9(1), 18–27.

Gultom, A., & Ramadhani, T. (2022). Application of protease enzymes in medical wound debridement: Current perspectives. Jurnal Ilmu Kedokteran dan Farmasi, 12(1), 55–64.

Gunawan, R., Tan, A., & Lim, Y. (2022). Green Reporting Practices in ASEAN Countries. Asian Accounting Review, 30(1), 23–40.

Hanifah, N., & Budiarto, H. (2023). Effect of pH and temperature on the activity and stability of bacterial proteases for medical use. Indonesian Biomedical Journal, 9(2), 94–101.

Hasan, S., Zaki, M., & Harun, A. (2022). Protease production by halophilic bacteria from coastal soils and its potential applications. Journal of Microbial Research, 14(3), 99–112.

Lestari, F., & Sembiring, D. (2023). Digital Transformation in Accounting: Cloud Systems and Financial Integrity. International Journal of Digital Accounting, 12(4), 101–115.

Mahendra, R., & Cahyani, D. (2022). Therapeutic use of microbial proteases in burn wound healing: An experimental study. Medical Biotechnology Reports, 5(2), 76–84.

Nasution, M., & Rizki, N. (2023). Corporate Sustainability Reports and Competitive Advantage. Indonesian Journal of Business and Accounting, 25(3), 75–89.

Nugroho, R., & Anjani, S. (2023). Public perception and bioethical concerns in microbial enzyme-based therapies. Bioethics and Health Policy Journal, 7(1), 66–74.

Pramudya, I., Liana, M., & Handayani, R. (2023). Application of protease in tissue engineering: Modification of scaffold biomaterials. Journal of Biomedical Research Indonesia, 11(4), 189–198.

Putri, D. A. (2021). ESG Reporting Practices and Stock Stability in Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 22(1), 45–58.

Putri, D., & Kurniawan, A. (2022). Immobilized microbial protease for wound care: A review. Jurnal Bioteknologi dan Farmasi, 10(3), 145–153.

Rahman, H., Irawati, S., & Nugraha, Y. (2021). Protease activity as a cancer biomarker: The future of non-invasive diagnostics. Journal of Molecular Diagnostics Indonesia, 6(2), 112–120.

Ramadhani, T., & Dewi, S. (2023). Formulation of protease-based hydrogel for diabetic wound therapy. Pharmaceutical Formulation Journal, 14(2), 102–111.

Setiawan, A., Sari, D., & Pratiwi, I. (2023). Aloe vera and centella-based topical formulation enhanced with microbial protease. Journal of Medicinal Plants and Therapeutics, 9(1), 41–50.

Sunny, R., & Apsara, I. (2024). Sustainability Practices and Financial Outcomes in Southeast Asia. Journal of Emerging Markets Finance, 10(1), 12–33.

Suryani, L., & Wijaya, M. (2023). Thermostable protease from thermophilic bacteria: Potential application in medical biotechnology. Enzyme and Microbial Technology Journal, 13(2), 88–96.

Taufiq, H., & Rahmawati, E. (2022). Enzymatic modulation of inflammation by microbial proteases in arthritis models. Medical Research Indonesia, 10(3), 134–142.

Wardani, H., & Kusuma, A. (2022). Sectoral Analysis of ESG Disclosure and Financial Returns. Sustainability and Accounting Review, 15(2), 88–102.

Wijaya, B., Kartika, N., & Dewi, S. (2023). ERP-based Accounting Systems and Corporate Financial Growth. Journal of Accounting Technology, 9(1), 60–77.

Yusuf, L., & Halim, R. (2022). Digital Accounting Implementation and Financial Reporting Efficiency. Journal of Modern Accounting Systems, 7(3), 112–129.

Published

2025-04-21

How to Cite

Ananta, Y. (2025). Literature Review on Characterization and Optimization of Protease Enzymes for Medical Applications. Dinasti Health and Pharmacy Science, 2(2), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.38035/dhps.v2i2.1824