Analysis of Government Management Transformation: Case Study of Position Equalization Program in the Melawi Regency Government
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i2.1074Keywords:
Bureaucratic Simplification, Position Equalization Program, Transformation of Government ManagementAbstract
The Indonesian government implements a policy of equalizing position as a simplification of bureaucracy. The policy is seen as the transformation of government management with complex challenges. This article aims to analyze the important aspects of the transformation of government management in equalizing positions in Melawi Regency in 2021-2024. Data is collected from important officials who sit in government and members of parliament, without ignoring the opinions of the public. The results show that (a) reframing aspect is considered good enough in the "Achieve Mobilization" element and needs an increase in the "Creating Vision" and "Build a Measurement System" elements by re-frame programs and fulfillment of performance targets, (b) restructuring aspect in implementation element of "Construction an Economic Model" and "Redesigning The Work Architecture" is good enough and needs an increase in the element of "Configuring the Physical Infrastructure" by immediately forming a public service mall, (c) revitalization aspect is good enough from the three elements described, and (d) renewal aspect is good in the "Create a Reward System" and "Developing The Organization" elements, so it only needs to be improved in "Building Individual Learning" element by adding competency development to the equivalent functional position to improve existing services.
References
Beatrix, G., & Apriyansyah, H. (2022). Career Development of Functional Positions, Simpli ication of Organizational Structure, And Equality of Administrative Positions Into Functional Positions: A Literature Review. Journal of Sustainable Community Development (JSCD), 4(2), 129–140.
Denning, S. (2018). The age of agile: How smart companies are transforming the way work gets done. Amacom.
Drewry, G., & Chan, C.-P. (2001). Civil Service Reform in the People’s Republic of China: Another Mirage of the New Global Paradigm of Public Administration? International Review of Administrative Sciences, 67(3), 461–478.
Fountain, J. E. (2001). Paradoxes of public sector customer service. Governance, 14(1), 55–73.
Gandhi, A., Ruldeviyani, Y., & Sucahyo, Y. G. (2017). Strategic information systems planning for bureaucratic reform. 2017 International Conference on Research and Innovation in Information Systems (ICRIIS), 1–6.
Gedeona, H. T., & Trilestari, E. W. (2021). The Model for Implementing Bureaucratic Reform in the Ministry of Administrative Reform. 2nd International Conference on Administration Science 2020 (ICAS 2020), 146–155.
Holbeche, L. (2015). The Agile Organization: How to build an innovative, sustainable and resilient business. Kogan Page Publishers.
Insani, I., Warsono, H., Kismartini, K., & Astuti, R. S. (2022). Analysis of the Implementation of Policy on Equalizing Administrative Positions to Functional Positions in Central Government Agencies. PERSPEKTIF, 11(3), 901–909.
Irwansyah, I. (2021). Adhocracy as a model for organizing government institution in simplifying Indonesian bureaucracy. Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 17(2), 241–258.
Janssen, M., & Van Der Voort, H. (2016). Adaptive governance: Towards a stable, accountable and responsive government. In Government Information Quarterly (Vol. 33, Issue 1, pp. 1–5). Elsevier.
Janssen, M., & Van der Voort, H. (2020). Agile and adaptive governance in crisis response: Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Information Management, 55, 102180.
Maulana, A., Indriati, F., & Hidayah, K. (2022). Analysis of Bureaucratic Reform Through Delayering of Government Institutions in Indonesia. Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 18(2), 155–170.
Montheza, R., Simangunsong, F., & Ahmad, M. (2024). Organizational Development Republic of Indonesia Civil Servant Corps (KORPRI) at the National Counterterrorism Agency (BNPT). Jurnal Scientia, 13(03), 1–19.
Morgan, R. E., & Page, K. (2008). Managing business transformation to deliver strategic agility. Strategic Change, 17(5?6), 155–168.
Noermanzah, W. D. E. C., Friantary, H., & Arsyad, S. (2019). Joko Widodo’s rhetorical structure in the presidential speeches for addressing educational problems. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 8(10), 1794–1801.
Ober, J. (2015). Political Knowledge and Right-Sizing Government. Critical Review, 27(3–4), 362–374.
Pracoyo, N. A., Tubastuvi, N., Santoso, S. B., & Wahyuni, S. (2022). Determinants of employee performance: The mediating role of job satisfaction. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), 11(2), 144–156.
Rahmi, E., & Wijaya, C. (2022). Analysis of Public Service Quality Improvement Through Bureaucratic Simplification Policies. Technium Soc. Sci. J., 36, 29.
Redjo, S. I. (2009). Transformasi Manajemen Pemerintahan: Kasus di Pemerintah Kota Bandung. Sosiohumaniora, 11(3), 25–35.
Saefullah, D., Karnesih, E., & Bekti, H. (2019). Reframing on Organization Transforming at PT. Kereta Api Indonesia. International Conference on Democratisation in Southeast Asia (ICDeSA 2019), 83–88.
Sangkut, B., Rimbano, D., & Susanto, Y. (2023). Systematic Literature Review: The Implementation of Equalization from Administrative Positions to Functional Positions. Proceedings International Conference on Business, Economics & Management, 1, 191–201.
Sipayung, N., Sumaryadi, I. N., Daraba, D., & Lukman, S. (2022). The Policy Implementation Of Simplification Bureaucracy For Performance Improvement In The Ministryof Administrative And Bureaucratic Reform. Devotion-Journal of Research and Community Service, 3(13), 2433–2448.
Suprayitno, N. F., & Abbas, S. A. (2024). Bureaucratic Transformation in Indonesia: An In-Depth Analysis from the Perspective of Public Administration. Mandat: Journal of Politics, Government, and Public Administration, 1(1), 34–51.
Tomasouw, N. A., & Muluk, M. R. K. (2022). Challenges of Implementing Bureaucratic Reform and Position Equalization in Mimika Regency Government. International Conference on Communication, Policy and Social Science (InCCluSi 2022), 487–494.
Wasistiono, S., & Anggraini, W. (2019). Three paradigms in government (good governance, dynamic governance, and agile governance). International Journal of Kybernology, 4(2), 79–91.
Widanarto, A. (2016). Transformasi manajemen pemerintahan dari aspek lingkungan di kota bandung. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan ISSN, 2442, 5958.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Nurkhamdi, Samugyo Ibnu Redjo, Neneng Yani Yuningsih
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH).
