Trademark Sales Study as Boedel Bankrupt by the Curator

Authors

  • Aldy Wicaksono Universitas Tarumanagara
  • Ahmad Sudiro Universitas Tarumanagara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i2.1085

Keywords:

Boedel Goes Bankrupt, Intellectual Property Rights (IPR), Curator, Trademark

Abstract

Trademarks are included in the Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) regime in Indonesia because trademark rights are always attached to economic rights. This study uses a normative method by collecting secondary data. Qualitative analysis was carried out on secondary data to obtain conclusions about the Nyonya Meneer brand as an intangible asset owned by PT Nyonya Meneer which is bankrupt based on the Commercial Court Decision. As a result of the law of PT Nyonya Meneer being bankrupt, the Curator carried out the settlement and management of the bankrupt estate including the Nyonya Meneer brand by auction through private sales with an appraisal value of Rp. 200 billion to Rp. 10.25 billion. It is hoped that the government will make a regulation related to the valuation regulations for IPR as well as regulations related to the transfer of IPR as bankrupt assets and create a special appraisal institution to provide legal certainty for the curator in carrying out his duties and authorities.

References

Zainal Asikin, Hukum Kepailitan dan Penundaan Pembayaran Utang di Indonesia, (Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2001), hal. 25.

Andhika Mopeng, “Hak-Hak Kebendaan Yang Bersifat Jaminan Ditinjau Dari Aspek Hukum Perdata”, Jurnal Lex Crimen, Vol. VI No. 10, 2017, hal. 168.

Okias Supriyanti, “Analisis Yuridis Proses Pengalihan Hak Atas Merek Nyonya Meneer Sebagai Objek Harta Yang Diperoleh Melalui Pelelangan Harta Perusahaan Yang Dinyatakan Pailit”, Under Graduates thesis, Universitas Negeri Semarang, 2023.

Mohammad Khabib Zamzami, 72 Merek Dagang Nyonya Meneer Dijual Rp. 10 Miliar, terdapat dalam https://www.suaramerdeka.com/news/baca/185825/72-merek-dagang-nyonya-meneerdijual-rp-10-miliar, diakses pada Jum’at, 24 Juni 2024, pukul 20.25 WIB

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum, (Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2011), hal. 32.

R. Subekti, dan R. Tjitrosudiro, 2004, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata, Jakarta, Pradnya Paramitha, hal. 291 .

Emmy Yuhassarie dkk, 2005, Hak Kekayaan Intelektual dan Perkembangannya, Pusat Pengkajian Hukum, Jakarta Selatan, hal. 5.

Moch. Zulkarnain Al Mufti, 2016, “Tanggung Jawab Kurator dalam Penjualan Harta Pailit di Bawah Tangan”, Jurnal Lex Renaissance, Volume 1, Nomor 1, hal. 92-108.

Imran Nating, 2004, Peranan dan Tanggung Jawab Kurator dalam Pengurusan dan Pemberesan Harta Pailit, Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, hal. 116-117.

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata, (KUHPerdata).

Indonesia, Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang, UU No. 37 Tahun 2004.

Indonesia, Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis, UU No. 24 Tahun 2016.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-03

How to Cite

Aldy Wicaksono, & Ahmad Sudiro. (2025). Trademark Sales Study as Boedel Bankrupt by the Curator. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 5(2), 1171–1177. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i2.1085