Analysis of the Judge's Considerations Rejecting Applications for the Court Order of Guardianship And Permission to Sell Land Rights Owned by Minors And the Legal Implications Regarding Deeds of Sale And Purchase by PPAT (Study of the Court Order of the Sangatta District Court Number: 13/Pdt.P/2023/PN.Sgt)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i2.1121Keywords:
Guardianship, Permission to Sell, Minors, The Land Titles Registrar (PPAT), Deed of Sale and PurchaseAbstract
The purpose of this research is to find out the judge’s considerations in rejecting the application for guardianship and permission to sell land rights belonging to a minor child by his biological mother in the Court Order of the Sangatta District Court Number 13/Pdt.P/2023/PN.Sgt. The methodology is doctrinal research, by relating the main research problem with legal theory, legislation, and court precedence relating to guardianship of minors and permission to sell. This research was analyzed using an empirical juridical approach, by analyzing the legal material and then examining the results of the analysis with interviews. The researcher attemped to providing a perspective and solution to the problem raised. The results showed that the judge rejected the application with the consideration that the living parent automatically exercises parental authority and is free to take legal action on behalf of their children both before and outside the court without applying a guardianship application. The impact of the decision can be interpreted that the applicant can carry out the legal actions, including signing a deed of sale and purchase of the inherited land without a guardianship court order or permission to sell from the court. This creates legal uncertainty and confusion in the process of making a deed of sell and purchase by the Land Titles Registrar (PPAT). A sale and purchase deed made without a guardianship court order and permission from the court or a deed made on the basis of a judge’s consideration as in the court order decision, the registration process would be declined by the Land Registry Office. For similar cases that may occur in the future, it will open up the possibility of parents arbitrarily exercising parental authority because there is no supervision by judge in the form of Court Order of Guardianship and permission to sell Land Rights belonging to minors
References
Darmabrata, W. (2015). Hukum Perkawinan Perdata Putusnya Perkawinan Keturunan Kekuasaan Orang Tua Perwalian dan Pengampuan. Rizkita.
Hartono. (2019). Makna Frasa Kepentingan Anak Dalam Pasal 48 Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan Terkait Izin Jual atau Izin Menjaminkan Benda Tetap Milik Anak Dalam Perspektif Perlindungan Anak. Universitas Brawijaya.
Menteri Agraria dan Tata Ruang. (2015). Surat Edaran Menteri Agraria dan Tata Ruang/Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Tentang Batasan Usia Dewasa Dalam Rangka Pelayanan Pertanahan, SEMA Nomor 4/SE/I/2015.
Pengadilan Negeri Sangatta. (2023). Penetapan Nomor 13/Pdt.P/2023/PN.Sgt.
Peraturan Pemerintah. (1998). Peraturan Pemerintah Tentang Peraturan Jabatan Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah , PP Nomor 37 Tahun 1998, LN No. 52 Tahun 1998, TLN No. 3746, Pasal 1 angka 1.
Subekti, R. (2002). Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Waris. Intermasa.
Subekti, R., & Tjitrosudibio, R. (2006). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata: Bulgelijk Wetboek. Pradnya Paramita.
Undang-Undang. (1974). Undang-Undang Tentang Perkawinan ,UU Nomor 1 Tahun 1974, LN No. 1 Tahun 1974, TLN No. 3019.
Zahri, H. A. (2020). Disparitas Penetapan Pengadilan Atas Permohonan Perwalian Orang Tua Kandung. Badilag.Mahkamahagung.Go.Id. https://badilag.mahkamahagung.go.id/artikel/publikasi/artikel/disparitas-penetapan-pengadilan-atas-permohonan-perwalian-orang-tua-kandung-oleh-h-a-zahri-s-h-m-hi-23-11
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Arini Prasetiyowati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH).
