The Power of Circumstantial Evidence in the Trial Process The Crime of Murder
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i3.1254Keywords:
Circumstantial Evidence, Corroboration, And the Offence of MurderAbstract
This research explores the power of circumstantial evidence in proving murder offences, focusing on the case of Jessica Kumala Wongso. In this case, despite the absence of direct evidence, elements such as CCTV footage, the motive of the accused, as well as forensic evidence played an important role in building the case against the accused. Using a normative juridical method and a case study approach, this research analyses the role and relevance of circumstantial evidence in Indonesian criminal procedure law. The results show that, although circumstantial evidence has significant power, its assessment must be done carefully and logically by the judge to avoid mistakes that can be detrimental to justice for the defendant. The Jessica Wongso case emphasises the importance of a coherent and integrated pattern of evidence, in order for the court to ensure that its decisions are based on in-depth analysis and not mere assumption.
References
Adam Bastian Mardhatillah & ahmad Mahyani. (2019). Bukti Tidak Langsung Sebagai Dasar
Hakim Menjatuhkan Pidana (Putusan Nomor: 777/Pid.B/2016/PN.JKT.PST), Mimbar
Keadilan, 12 (1).
Andi Hamzah. (2017). Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Andrio Jackmico Kalensang. (2016). Hubungan Sebab Akibat (Causaliteit) Dalam Hukum
Pidana Dan Penerapannya Dalam, Praktek, Lex Crimen , 5(7).
Adami Chazawi. (2010). Kejahatan Terhadap Tubuh dan Nyawa, , Edisi Cetakan ke-5,
Rajawali Pers, Jakarta.
Arman Dhani. (2016). Ingus Jessica Sebagai Circumstantial Evidence, https://tirto.id/ingusjessica-sebagai-circumstantial-evidence-bYwx.
Bayu Setiawan. (2018). Penerapan Hukum Progresif Oleh Hakim Untuk Mewujudkan
Keadilan Substantif Transendensi, Jurnal Kosmik, Hukum, 18 (1).
Binyamin Blum. (2019). Evidence Law: Convictions Based on Circumstantial Evidence, The
Judges' Book 3 (11).
Dedi Hartono Latif. (2016). Peran Alat Bukti Petunjuk Dalam Tindak Pidana Umum Menurut
KUHAP, Lex Administratum, 4 (3).
Dewi Bunga & Ni Putu Diana Sari. (2024). Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan dalam Delik Kejahatan
Terhadap Nyawa(Kajian terhadap Unsur Kesengajaan dengan Alasan Pembelaan Diri),
Satya Dharma: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 7 (1).
Eddy O.S.Hiariej. (2012). Teori & Hukum Pembuktian, Erlangga, Jakarta.
Fachrul Rozi. (2018). Sistem Pembuktian Dalam Proses Persidangan Pada Perkara Tindak
Pidana, Jurnal Yuridis Unaja , 1 (2).
Hendrastanto et al. (1987). Kapita Selekta hukum acara Pidana di Indonesia, PT Bina Aksara,
Jakarta.
I. Doolittle. (1983). Sir William Blackstone And His Commentaries On The Laws Of England
(1765–9): A Biographical Approach, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 3.
Kadi Sukarna. (2016). Alat Bukti Petunjuk Menurut KUHAP Dalam Perspektif Teori Keadilan,
, UNNES PRESS, Semarang.
M. Yahya Harahap. (2006). Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP Penyidikan
dan Penuntutan (Cet. ke-6), Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
M. Yahya Harahap. (2007). Hukum Acara Perdata: Tentang Gugatan, Persidangan,
Penyitaan, Pembuktian, dan Putusan Pengadilan, , Edisi Ke-7, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Miftahul Chaer Amiruddin & Rahman Samsuddin. (2021). Analisis Yuridis Pertimbangan
Tentang Keyakinan Hakim Dalam Memutus Perkara Dengan Berdasar Circumstantial
Evidence Atau Bukti Tidak Langsung (Studi Putusan No.777/Pid.B/2016/Pn.Jkt.Pst
Kasus Jessica Kumala Wongso), Alauddin Law Development Journal (ALDEV), 3 (3).
Moch. Dani Pratama Huzaini. (2022). Implementasi Circumstantial Evidence dalam
Pembuktian Perkara Pidana di Pengadilan. Implementasi Circumstantial Evidence dalam
Pembuktian Perkara Pidana di Pengadilan
Muhammad Januar Rizki. (2023). Membedah Ulang Pembuktian Kasus Kopi Sianida Jessica
Wongso, Membedah Ulang Pembuktian Kasus Kopi Sianida Jessica Wongso.
Mukti Fajar & Yulianto Achmad. (2010). Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris,
Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki. (2010). Penelitian Hukum, Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta.
Putusan PT JAKARTA Nomor 393/PID/2016/PT.DKI
Pradikta Andi Alfat. (2021). Esensi Asas ‘In Dubio Pro Preo’ dalam Hukum Pidana, Esensi
Asas 'In Dubio Pro Preo' dalam Hukum Pidana - Populinews.
Rivatul Azizah & Nurbaedah. (2017). Kajian Yuridis Tentang Kekuatan Pembuktian Pendapat
Ahli Dalam Proses Pemeriksaan Pidana (Studi Putusan Nomor : 863 / Pid. B / 2015 / PN
Dps), Journal Diversi, 3 (2).
Sari,Mirna et. al (2017). Peranan ahli toksikologi Forensik dalam upaya pembuktian tindak
pidana pembunuhan berencan, Jurnal Poenale Hukum Pidana,5 (3)
Soerjono Soekanto. (1983). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum, Raja
Grafindo Persada.
Titin Apriani. (2020). Kedudukan Doktrin Res Ipsa Loquitur (Doktrin Yang Memihak Pada
Korban) Dalam Tata Hukum Indonesia, 14 (1).
Urbanus Ura Weruin. (2017). Logic, Reasoning and Legal Argumentation, Jurnal Konstitusi,
Volume 14 (2).
Waluyadi. (2004). Hukum Pembuktian dalam Perkara Pidana untuk Mahasiswa dan Praktisi.
Mandar Maju. Bandung.
Wirjono Prodjodikoro. (2003). "Asas-asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia," Edisi Revisi,. Eresco,
Bandung
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dessy Adhya Purwandiny, Rendy Erianto Jullyan, Irwanda Imawan
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b67b2/b67b296c4d3b028c918eaf7bf864d9ab589a7b44" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH).