Statistical Analysis of Time and Cost Efficiency of Construction Dispute Resolution Through Mediation Compared to Arbitration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i3.1290Keywords:
Dispute Resolution, Litigation, Arbitration, Mediation.Abstract
Non-litigation conflicts can be settled in a number of ways, including through arbitration and mediation. "A method for testing a particular theory by examining the relationship between variables" is the quantitative approach that is employed. The study's findings indicate that the time frames for arbitrating and mediating disputes differ; specifically, the arbitration ruling must be rendered no later than 30 days following the conclusion of the dispute examination. The cost of using the mediation room is not included in the price of using mediation to settle issues in court. This period may be extended, nevertheless, by the arbitration panel or the lone arbitrator. After the mediator is chosen, the mediation procedure can take up to 40 working days, and the arbitration ruling is final and binding on the parties. A maximum extension of 14 working days may be made to this time frame. In the event that mediation produces a written agreement, the parties are required to draft and sign it. The fees for arbitrating disputes differ based on the arbitration organization and the amount of the claim; they could include Registration cost: The registration cost for the arbitration request, Cost of administration: The arbitration administration charge is determined using a tariff scale. Arbitrator's fee: The cost of hiring arbitrators is determined using a tariff scale. along with The cost of hearing: The parties, respondent, or applicant bear the pro rata costs of the arbitration hearing.
References
Ainun Fadillah, F., & Amalia Putri, S. (2021). Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Dan Arbitrase (Literature Review Etika). 2(6). https://doi.org/10.31933/jimt.v2i6
Anwar, S., & Wahyu Sururie, R. (2021). Model Penyelesaian Sengketa Mediasi Di Pengadilan Agama Bandung Dan Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Kota Bandung. 2(2), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.15575/as.v2i2.14338
Baharuddin, M. Y. A. (2024). Peran Hukum Arbitrase Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Nasional. Jurnal Risalah Kenotariatan, 5(2), 310–320. https://doi.org/10.29303/risalahkenotariatan.v5i2.209
Caniago, V. A. (2022). Arbitrase Sebagai Alternatif Solusi Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis di Luar Pegadilan. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 8(20), 304–313. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7242951
Fadilla, Z., Ketut Ngurah Ardiawan, M., Eka Sari Karimuddin Abdullah, M., Jannah Ummul Aiman, M., & Hasda, S. (2021). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif. Yayasan Penerbit Muhammad Zaini.
Hadi Ismanto, S. H. (2019). Analisis Pengaruh Dewan Sengketa & Arbitrase Terhadap Penyelesaian Sengketa Konstruksi Berdasarkan Fidic Condition Of Contract 2017. Jurnal Konstruksia, 10(1), 73–86.
Hendra, M. J., & Nefri, J. E. (2024). Mediasi Dan Arbitrase. Hutanasyah?: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara, 2(2), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.37092/hutanasyah.v2i2.669
Kadek Candra Nanda Devi, N., & Julia Mahadewi, K. (2022). Skema Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Proses Mediasi Berdasarkan Perma No. 1 Tahun 2016. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 6(2).
Nancy M.Rezeki Saragih. (2021). Efektivitas Mediasi Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata Di Pengadilan Negeri Lubuk Pakam Kelas Ia. Jurnal Rectum, 3(1), 385–396.
Rahmah, D. M. (2019). Optimalisasi Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Mediasi Di Pengadilan. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum , 4(1), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v4n1.1
Rahmatsyah. (2023). The Effectiveness Of Arbitration As An Expensive Alternative Dispute Resolution. Pena Justisia, 22(1), 1–8. https://gnsso.icdfann.org/en/drafts/intl-dispute-resolutionoverview-june-2007.pdf
Revita Nurahmasari, M. A. A. A. (2021). Mediasi Sebagai Kewajiban Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata Pelanggaran Paten Di Indonesia Demi Kepastian Dan Kemanfaatan Hukum. Acta Diurnal Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan, 5(1), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.23920/acta.v5i1.712
Rizkiana, R. E. (2021). The Future Of Online Dispute Resolution: Building A Framework For E-Commerce Dispute Resolution In Indonesia. The Lawpreneurship Journal, 1(2), 114–138. https://jetcommerce.co.id/update/transaksi-e-commerce-meningkat-hingga-kuartal-iv-2020-
Roselyn, O.?:, Mangei, B., Sumakul, T. F., & Pinasang, R. (2020). Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 1. Lex Privatum, VIII(3), 54–64.
Septian Eka Putra, M. U. (2021). pelaksanaan mediasi dalam penyelesaian sengketa perdata berdasarkan peraturan mahkamah agung nomor 1 tahun 2016 tentang prosedur mediasi di pengadilan. Lex Lata Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum, 3(3), 432–441.
Sudiarawan, K. A., Gede, P., Sumerta Yasa, A., Putu, D., Kasih, D., Dananjaya, N. S., Ketut, N., & Damayanti, D. (2024). Formulation of Online Dispute Resolution in Realizing Fair Industrial Relations Dispute Settlement: A Comparative Study. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 12. https://doi.org/10.29303/v12i2.1308
Tasmin, M. (2019). Urgensi Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Di Negara Indonesia. Jurnal Wasaka Hukum, 7(2), 351–386.
Tesalonika C. M. Hombokau. (2024). Penyelesaian Sengketa Arbitrase Internasional Dalam Sengketa Kapal Marina Bay. Alethea?: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum , 8(1), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.24246/alethea.vol8.no1.p53-67
Wahyuningsih, P., & Nendra Asa Deyau, B. (2024). Comparison of The Effectiveness of Business Dispute Resolution Through Mediation, Arbitration, and Litigation. Research Horizon, 4(5), 55–64.
Wajdi, F., Seplyana, D., Rumahlewang, E., Nour Halisa, N., Rusmalinda, S., Kristiana, R., Fathun Niam, M., Wahyuning Purwanti, E., Melinasari, S., & Kusumaningrum, R. (2024). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Widina Media Utama. www.freepik.com
Zulfikar, R., Permata Sari, F., Fatmayati, A., Wandini, K., Haryati, T., Jumini, S., Annisa, S., Budi Kusumawardhani, O., Mutiah, atul, Indrakusuma Linggi, A., & Fadilah, H. (2024). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif (Teori, Metode Dan Praktik). Widina Media Utama. www.freepik.com
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Lutfi Mustakim, Sami’an, Sarwono Hardjomuljadi
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b67b2/b67b296c4d3b028c918eaf7bf864d9ab589a7b44" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH).