The Urgency of Law Enforcement Regarding The Existence of Subsidiaries as a Form of Avoidance of Laws Prohibiting Monopoly Practices and Unfair Business Competition

Authors

  • Dwi Natalia Martama Hutabarat Fakultas Hukum Universitas HKBP Nommensen Medan
  • Martono Anggusti Fakultas Hukum Universitas HKBP Nommensen Medan
  • Jinner Sidauruk Fakultas Hukum Universitas HKBP Nommensen Medan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i3.1314

Keywords:

Subsidiaries, Monopolistic Practices, Business Competition, Supervision, Legal Remedies

Abstract

This research analyzes the legal position of subsidiaries in the context of Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition. The main focus of the research is to identify legal loopholes in subsidiary regulations that can be exploited for monopolistic practices and unfair business competition, as well as formulating legal remedies to address them. The research uses a normative juridical method with a case study approach to Lion Group Airlines. The results show that the regulation of group companies, which is still based on the 2007 Company Law with a single company approach, has created legal loopholes that allow monopolistic practices through subsidiaries. This is evident in the Lion Group Airlines case, where discriminatory practices occurred through exclusive agreements between the parent company and its subsidiaries, which harmed other business actors. To address these issues, several legal measures are needed, including: (1) prohibiting manipulation of company organs through corporate actions, (2) establishing a special supervisory body, (3) prohibiting market manipulation through subsidiaries, (4) implementing reversed burden of proof for negative market impacts, and (5) nullifying agreements that result in unfair competition. This research recommends the need for revision of Law No. 5 of 1999 to regulate more comprehensively about monopolistic practices through subsidiaries and strengthen supervision of corporate actions.

References

Abraham Gilbert, “Urgensi Perubahan Metode Penyelesaian Sengketa Niaga Melalui Pengadilan Niaga” ICL Paper

Clinard, Marshal B & Peter C. Yeage, “Corporate Crime”, The Free Press, New York, 1983

Dhaniswara K. Harjono, Monograf Kedudukan Hukum Perusahaan Induk (Holding Company), UKI Press, Jakarta, 2021.

Emmy Pangaribuan Simanjuntak, “Hukum Perusahaan Kelompok dan Globalisasi Usaha (Concern)”, Bahan Ajar Mata Kuliah Hukum Dagang Internasional, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, 2008

Kompas Cyber Media,2021 “Kompas.Com, Terbukti Lakukan Praktik Monopoli, 3 Perusahaan Lion Air Group Didenda Rp 1 Miliar Halaman all - Kompas.com.” Diakses 26 November 2024.

M. Yahya Harahap, Hukum Perseroan Terbatas, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2016

Murjianto R., Pengantar Hukum Dagang: Aspek-Aspek Hukum Perusahaan dan Larangan Praktek Monopoli, Liberty, Yogyakarta, 2002

Peraturan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha Nomor 3 Tahun 2023 Tentang Penilaian Terhadap Penggabungan, Peleburan, atau Pengambilahlian Saham dan/atau Aset Yang Dapat Mengakibakan Terjadinya Praktik Monopoli dan/atau Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat

Siti Bianca Zahara, “Tanggung Jawab Perusahaan Induk Lion Group Terhadap Praktik Diskriminasi Penjualan Kapasitas Kargo”, Reformasi Hukum Trisakti, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2022.

Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1995 Tentang Perseroan Terbatas

Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja

Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 Tentang Perseroan Terbatas

Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 Tentang Larangan Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat

Downloads

Published

2025-01-31

How to Cite

Dwi Natalia Martama Hutabarat, Martono Anggusti, & Jinner Sidauruk. (2025). The Urgency of Law Enforcement Regarding The Existence of Subsidiaries as a Form of Avoidance of Laws Prohibiting Monopoly Practices and Unfair Business Competition. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 5(3), 1398–1406. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i3.1314

Most read articles by the same author(s)