Analysis of Public Perception of the Implementation of Minister of Home Affairs Regulation Number 72 of 2022: A Quantitative Study on Digital Population Identity in Pontianak City

Authors

  • Riyoldi Program Studi Administrasi Publik, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia
  • Entang Adhy Muhtar Program Studi Administrasi Publik, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia
  • Nina Karlina Program Studi Administrasi Publik, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i3.1320

Keywords:

Technology Acceptance Model, Digital Population Identity, Public Perception Permendagri 72 Tahun 2022

Abstract

The Indonesian government, through Minister of Home Affairs Regulation No. 72 of 2022, introduced the Digital Population Identity (IKD) application as a step toward digital transformation in administrative services. This study aims to analyze public acceptance of the IKD application in Pontianak City using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) framework, focusing on the dimensions of Perceived Usefulness (PU) and Perceived Ease of Use (PEU). A survey of 467 respondents revealed that while the application is acknowledged as beneficial and relatively easy to use, a significant proportion of neutral responses in both dimensions indicates a gap between user expectations and experiences. Privacy concerns and trust in data security emerged as key challenges to technology adoption. By integrating risk and trust theories into TAM, this study finds that government transparency, data security enhancement, and digital literacy education are essential elements for building public trust. The study recommends optimizing application features, improving interface design, developing segmented communication strategies, and strengthening public outreach to establish an inclusive and reliable digital ecosystem for administrative services.

References

Acharya, A. S., Prakash, A., Saxena, P., & Nigam, A. (2013). Sampling: Why and how of it. Indian Journal of Medical Specialties, 4(2), 330–333.

Aleisa, N. (2024). Key factors influencing the e-government adoption: a systematic literature review. Journal of Innovative Digital Transformation, 1(1), 14–31. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIDT-09-2023-0016

Al-Shafi, S. (2009). FACTORS AFFECTING E-GOVERNMENT IMPLEMENTATION AND ADOPTION IN THE STATE OF QATAR. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:155046046

Anand, N., & Brass, I. (2021). Responsible innovation for digital identity systems. Data & Policy, 3, e35. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/dap.2021.35

Andersen, M. S. (2021). Towards the Design of a Privacy-preserving Attribute Based Credentials-based Digital ID in Denmark – Usefulness, Barriers, and Recommendations. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security. https://doi.org/10.1145/3465481.3469211

Arunwatanamongkol, P., Nupairoj, N., & Tanlamai, U. (2021). Innovative Delegation Application in Thai National Digital Identity Platform. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (IJIM), 15(14), 17–37. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i14.22055

Ayodele, O. (2024). Opening the ‘black box’ of national digital identity systems: another invisible border for Africans? Round Table, 113(5), 462–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/00358533.2024.2410547

BBC. (2023, July 18). Ratusan juta data Dukcapil Kemendagri diduga bocor, pakar siber: “Ini peretasan paling parah.” https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/articles/c51v25916zlo

Beduschi, A. (2019). Digital identity: Contemporary challenges for data protection, privacy and non-discrimination rights. Big Data & Society, 6(2), 2053951719855091. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719855091

Beduschi, A. (2021). Rethinking digital identity for post-COVID-19 societies: Data privacy and human rights considerations. Data & Policy, 3, e15. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/dap.2021.15

Bélanger, F., & Crossler, R. E. (2011). Privacy in the digital age: a review of information privacy research in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 1017–1041.

Bisnis Tekno. (2023, December 26). 3 Dugaan Kebocoran Data Terbesar di Indonesia 2023, KPU hingga Dukcapil. Bisnis Tekno. https://teknologi.bisnis.com/read/20231226/84/1727235/3-dugaan-kebocoran-data-terbesar-di-indonesia-2023-kpu-hingga-dukcapil

Blöbaum, B. (2016). Key Factors in the Process of Trust. On the Analysis of Trust under Digital Conditions. In B. Blöbaum (Ed.), Trust and Communication in a Digitized World: Models and Concepts of Trust Research (pp. 3–25). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28059-2_1

Boysen, A. (2021). Decentralized, Self-Sovereign, Consortium: The Future of Digital Identity in Canada. Frontiers in Blockchain, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbloc.2021.624258

Brandtzaeg, P. B., & Chaparro-Domínguez, M.-Á. (2019). From Youthful Experimentation to Professional Identity: Understanding Identity Transitions in Social Media. YOUNG, 28(2), 157–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/1103308819834386

Chen, L., & Aklikokou, A. K. (2020). Determinants of E-government Adoption: Testing the Mediating Effects of Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(10), 850–865. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1660989

CNN Indonesia. (2023, July 19). Deret Insiden Kebocoran Data WNI 2023, BPJS Hingga Dukcapil. CNN Indonesia. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/teknologi/20230719145802-185-975301/deret-insiden-kebocoran-data-wni-2023-bpjs-hingga-dukcapil

Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). Technology acceptance model. J Manag Sci, 35(8), 982–1003.

Dwivedi, V. P., & Bresson, X. (2020). A generalization of transformer networks to graphs. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:2012.09699.

Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., Tamilmani, K., & Raman, R. (2020). A meta-analysis based modified unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (meta-UTAUT): a review of emerging literature. Current Opinion in Psychology, 36, 13–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COPSYC.2020.03.008

Featherman, M. S., & Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Predicting e-services adoption: a perceived risk facets perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(4), 451–474. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00111-3

Friedhoff, T., Au, C. D., Ladnar, N., Stein, D., & Zureck, A. (2023). Analysis of Social Acceptance for the Use of Digital Identities. Computers, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/computers12030051

Gulati, S., McDonagh, J., Sousa, S., & Lamas, D. (2024). Trust models and theories in human–computer interaction: A systematic literature review. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 16, 100495. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHBR.2024.100495

Gupta, P., Hooda, A., Jeyaraj, A., Seddon, J. J. M., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2024). Trust, Risk, Privacy and Security in e-Government Use: Insights from a MASEM Analysis. Information Systems Frontiers. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-024-10497-8

Han, C. E., & Kuan, L. (n.d.). Digital Trust and Why It Matters.

Harbinja, E. (2017). Digital Inheritance in the United Kingdom. Journal of European Consumer and Market Law, 6, 253–256. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:158382956

Laukkanen, T., Sinkkonen, S., Kivijärvi, M., & Laukkanen, P. (2007). Innovation resistance among mature consumers. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 24, 419–427. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:168125058

Masiero, S., & Bailur, S. (2021). Digital identity for development: The quest for justice and a research agenda. In Information Technology for Development (Vol. 27, Issue 1, pp. 1–12). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2021.1859669

Normalini, M. K., Ramayah, T., & Shabbir, M. S. (2019a). Investigating the Impact of Security Factors In E-business and Internet Banking Usage Intention among Malaysians. Industrial Engineering & Management Systems, 18(3), 501–510. https://doi.org/10.7232/iems.2019.18.3.501

Normalini, M. K., Ramayah, T., & Shabbir, M. S. (2019b). Investigating the Impact of Security Factors In E-business and Internet Banking Usage Intention among Malaysians. Industrial Engineering & Management Systems. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:211761334

Palmisano, F., & Sacchi, A. (2024). Trust in public institutions, inequality, and digital interaction: Empirical evidence from European Union countries. Journal of Macroeconomics, 79, 103582. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMACRO.2023.103582

Pöysti, T. (2018). Trust on Digital Administration and Platforms. Scandinavian Studies in Law, 65, 321–363.

Rim, H. (2023). Decentralized identity (DID): new technology adoption and diffusion in South Korea. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 17(2), 251–270. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-11-2021-0189

Silva, P. (2015). Davis’ Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) (1989). In M. N. Al-Suqri & A. S. Al-Aufi (Eds.), Information Seeking Behavior and Technology Adoption: Theories and Trends (pp. 205–219). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8156-9.ch013

Silva, P., & Silva, P. (1 C.E.). Davis’ Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) (1989). In https://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/978-1-4666-8156-9.ch013 (pp. 205–219). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8156-9.ch013

Sun, L., Zhang, H., & Fang, C. (2021). Data security governance in the era of big data: status, challenges, and prospects. Data Science and Management, 2, 41–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DSM.2021.06.001

Tammpuu, P., & Masso, A. (2019). Transnational Digital Identity as an Instrument for Global Digital Citizenship: The Case of Estonia’s E-Residency. Information Systems Frontiers, 21(3), 621–634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-019-09908-y

Tempo. (2023, July 18). Dugaan Kebocoran Data Dukcapil: Ada 337 Juta Data, Mulai dari NIK hingga Akta Kelahiran. Tempo.Co. https://tekno.tempo.co/read/1749591/dugaan-kebocoran-data-dukcapil-ada-337-juta-data-mulai-dari-nik-hingga-akta-kelahiran

Thompson, S. K. (2012). Sampling (Vol. 755). John Wiley & Sons.

Udwan, G., Leurs, K., & Alencar, A. (2020a). Digital Resilience Tactics of Syrian Refugees in the Netherlands: Social Media for Social Support, Health, and Identity. Social Media + Society, 6(2), 2056305120915587. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120915587

Udwan, G., Leurs, K., & Alencar, A. (2020b). Digital Resilience Tactics of Syrian Refugees in the Netherlands: Social Media for Social Support, Health, and Identity. Social Media and Society, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120915587

van Kersbergen, K., & Tinggaard Svendsen, G. (2024). Social trust and public digitalization. AI & SOCIETY, 39(3), 1201–1212.

Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315.

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. In Source: MIS Quarterly (Vol. 27, Issue 3).

Wang, Y., Ran, B., & Ma, L. (2024). Paradoxes in Digital Government: A Systematic Literature Review. Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, 776–788.

Yuan, Y.-P., Dwivedi, Y. K., Tan, G. W.-H., Cham, T.-H., Ooi, K.-B., Aw, E. C.-X., & Currie, W. (2023). Government Digital Transformation: Understanding the Role of Government Social Media. Government Information Quarterly, 40(1), 101775. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101775

Zahara, Z. (2024). Persepsi dan Keputusan Adopsi Inovasi Teknologi Berbasis Kearifan Lokal Pada Budidaya Kopi di Lampung. Jurnal Kawistara, 14(2), 226. https://doi.org/10.22146/kawistara.82505

Zulkifli, F., Abidin, R. Z., & Mohamed, Z. (2019). Evaluating the quality of exam questions: A multidimensional item response. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(2 Special Issue 11), 606–612. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.B1094.0982S1119

Downloads

Published

2025-02-07

How to Cite

Riyoldi, Entang Adhy Muhtar, & Nina Karlina. (2025). Analysis of Public Perception of the Implementation of Minister of Home Affairs Regulation Number 72 of 2022: A Quantitative Study on Digital Population Identity in Pontianak City. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 5(3), 1930–1939. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i3.1320

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Riyoldi, Entang Adhy Muhtar, Nina Karlina

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:

  1. The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
  2. The author acknowledges that the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
  3. Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH).