Analysis Dissenting Opinion and Concurring Opinion in Decision MK No.90/PUU-XXI/2023 Perspective Siyasah Qadhaiyyah
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i2.1335Keywords:
Concurring Opinion, Dissenting Opinion, Fiqh Siyasah.Abstract
In the Constitutional Court Decision NO. 90/PUU-XXI/2023, which discusses the age limit for presidential and vice-presidential candidates, there are several discrepancies in the trial process. This is due to two constitutional judges presenting different arguments but reaching the same conclusion (Concurring Opinion) and four constitutional judges expressing differing opinions (Dissenting Opinion). There is an anomaly where the two judges with Concurring Opinions should be more appropriately categorized under Dissenting Opinions. If we examine the reasoning of the two judges with Concurring Opinions, it can be assessed that their arguments lean more towards the Dissenting Opinion, but their opinions shifted to the part that granted the request. The problem formulation to be discussed includes, first, how to analyze the Dissenting Opinion and Concurring Opinion of the judges in the Constitutional Court Decision No. 90/PUU-XXI/2023, which reflects differing views among the judges regarding the substance of the case examined, and second, how to view and interpret the Constitutional Court Decision No. 90/PUU-XXI/2023 regarding the judges' opinions in the trial from the perspective of Siyasah Qadhaiyyah, such as the principles of public policy in Islam that are oriented towards the welfare of the community.
References
“Concurring Opinion,” LII/Legal Information Institute, diakses 9 Oktober 2024, https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/concurring_opinion.
Ahmad Sudirman, “Analisis Siyasah Qadhaiyyah Terhadap Peran Dan Fungsi Lembaga Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Mengadili Sengketa Pemilu”, (Skripsi, Fakultas Syariah Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung, 2020).
Al-Mawardi, “Ahkam Sulthaniyah”, trans. Khalifurrahman & Faturrahman (Jakarta : Qisthi Press, 2014)
Bivitri Susanti, pakar hukum tata negara, wawancara daring, diakses pada 16 Oktober 2023, https://nasional.kompas.com
Hanif Fudin Azhar, “Pemikiran Imam Al-Mawardi tentang Politik dan Hukum Kekuasaan Kehakiman di Indonesia” ”, (Skripsi, Program Studi Hukum Tata Negara, IAIN Purwokerto, 2019).
Imam Mahdi, Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia, (Yogyakarta: Teras, 2011)
Joko Subagyo, Metode Penelitian dalam Teori dan Praktek (Jakarta : PT Rineka Cipta, 2015)
Keelan, Ms, Metide Penelitian Kualitatif Bidang Filsafat, (Jakarta : Paradigma, 2005)
Lilik Mulyadi, Putusan Hakim dalam Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, (Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti, 2009)
Meg Penrose, “Legal Clutter : How Concurring create Unnecessary Confusiun and Encourage Litigation”. Journal Texas A&M Law Scholarship, 2023. Terjemahan
Putusan MKMK No.2/MKMK/L/11/2023, tanggal 23 Oktober 2023
Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. (Bandung : Alfabeta, 2010)
Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 Pasal 14.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Muhammad Farhan, Khalid
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH).
