The Ineffectiveness of Dispute Resolution Through Arbitration According to Indonesian Law No. 30 of 1999 on ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution)

Authors

  • Didit Wijayanto Wijaya PhD in Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i3.1433

Keywords:

Ineffectiveness, Arbitration, Law No. 30 of 1999

Abstract

This article or writing aims to find out about the ineffectiveness of settlement through arbitration according to Republic of Indonesia Law Number 30 of 1999 concerning Adr (Alternative Dispute Resolation). The problem focuses on the ineffectiveness of settlement through arbitration according to Republic of Indonesia Law Number 30 of 1999 concerning ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution). In order to approach this problem, theoretical references from legal certainty and dispute resolution are used. The data was collected through normative legal research. The data source used is secondary data. Secondary data in this research is divided into 3 parts, including: Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Legal Materials and analyzed qualitatively.  This study concludes that arbitration is a method of resolving a civil dispute outside the general court which is based on an arbitration agreement made in writing by the parties to the dispute. However, arbitration forums also have weaknesses that both parties should consider before deciding to submit their case. Arbitration is considered to have several legal subject weaknesses in the form of states still being reluctant to give their commitment to hand over their rescue to international court bodies. The process of completing a settlement through arbitration does not guarantee that the decision will be binding.

References

Zainal,Asikin. 2012. Pengantar Tata Hukum Indonesia. Rajawali Press. Jakarta.

Budiman, Budhy. Mencari Model Ideal penyelesaian Sengketa, Kajian Terhadap praktik Peradilan Perdata dan Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999. http://www.uikabogor.ac.id/jur05.htm.

Pruit, Dean G. Konflik Sosial. Pustaka Belajar. Yogyakarta.

Rato, Dominikus. 2010. Filsafat Hukum: mencari, memahami dan memahami hukum. Laksbang Pressindo. Yogyakarta.

http//www.google.co.id/Pengertian+arbitrase. Accessed on 19 January 2024.

http://elib.unikom.ac.id/files/disk1/456/jbptunikompp-gdl-iiphimawan-22764-7-babii.pd. Accessed on 19 January 2024.

https://siplawfirm.id/kelebihan-dan-kekurangan-arbitrase-yang-perlu-diketahui/?lang=id. Accessed on 19 January 2024.

Nader, Laura. 1978. The Disputing Process Law in Ten Societies. Columbia University Press. New York.

Utama, Meria. 2012. Hukum Ekonomi Internasional. PT Fikahati Aneska. Jakarta.

Indratanto, Samudra Putra; Nurainun; and Kristoforus Laga Kleden. Asas Kepastian Hukum Dalam Implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Berbentuk Peraturan Lembaga Negara Dan Peraturan Pemerintah PenggantiUndang-Undang. Jurnal Imu Hukum 16, No.1 (2020): 88–100.

Sefriani. 2011. Hukum Internasional: Suatu Pengantar. Rajawali Pers. Jakarta.

Soeroso. 2011. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. PT Sinar Grafika. Jakarta.

Sudjana. Efektivitas dan Efisiensi Penyelesaian Sengketa Kekayaan Intelektual Melalui Arbitrase dan Mediasi Berdasarkan Undang-UndangNomor 30 Tahun 1999. AJUDIKASI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 2 No. 1, June 2018. Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran.

Republic of Indonesia Law Number 30 of 1999 concerning ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution)

Downloads

Published

2025-03-14

How to Cite

Didit Wijayanto Wijaya. (2025). The Ineffectiveness of Dispute Resolution Through Arbitration According to Indonesian Law No. 30 of 1999 on ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution). Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 5(3), 2288–2292. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i3.1433

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Didit Wijayanto Wijaya

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:

  1. The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
  2. The author acknowledges that the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
  3. Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH).