Regulation of Plea Bargaining Policy as a Novelty in Criminal Justice System to Create Effective and Efficient Criminal Law Enforcement: A Study of Ruu Kuhap
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i4.1454Keywords:
Plea Bargaining, Reform, Indonesia Criminal Justice SystemAbstract
The criminal justice system in Indonesia faces various challenges, such as lengthy judicial processes and case backlogs in the courts. To address these issues, reforms in the criminal justice system are necessary, one of which is the implementation of "Plea Bargaining." This writing is very beneficial as it examines the regulation of plea bargaining in the Draft Criminal Procedure Code (RUU KUHAP). The regulation of plea bargaining in the Indonesian criminal justice system provides benefits in creating an effective and efficient criminal law enforcement process, allowing cases to be resolved more quickly and reducing the burden on the judiciary. Plea Bargaining in the Draft Criminal Procedure Code (RUU KUHAP) is regulated in Article 199 of the Draft Criminal Procedure Code (RUU KUHAP).
References
Abdussalam, H. R., & Sitompul, D. P. M. (2007). The criminal justice system. Restu Agung, Jakarta.
Afdhali, D. R., & Syahuri, T. (2023). THE IDEALITY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF THE THEORY OF LEGAL OBJECTIVES. Collegium Studiosum Journal, 6(2), 555-561.
Alschuler, A. W. (1979). Plea bargaining and its history. Columbia Law Review, 79(1), 1-43.
Atmasasmita, R. (2010a). Contemporary Justice System. Kencana Preneda Media Group, Jakarta.
Atmasasmita, R. (2010b). Contemporary criminal justice system.
Bentham, J. (1781). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. History of Economic Thought Books.
Bentham, J. (2008). A Comment on the Commentaries and A Fragment on Government. Oxford University Press.
Black, H. C. (1990). Black's Law Dictionary with pronunciations. St. Paul: West Publishing,.
Black, H. C. (2009). Black's Law Dictionary. 9-th ed. St. Paul, Minn: Thomson Reuters.
Bojani?, I., & BOJANI?, I. B. (2015). Plea Bargaining: A Challenging Issue in the Law and Economics. Interdisciplinary Management Researhc/Interdisciplinaere Managementforschung, 752-766.
Chambliss. (1970). The Unconstitutionality of Plea Bargaining. H. Atv. L. REV., 83, 1387.
Dewi, D. S., & Syukur, F. A. (2011). Penal Mediation: The Application of Restorative Justice in Indonesian Juvenile Courts. Indie Pub.
Flynn, A., & Fitz-Gibbon, K. (2011). Bargaining with defensive homicide: Examining Victoria's secretive plea bargaining system post-law reform. Melb. UL Rev., 35, 905.
Garoupa, N., & Stephen, F. H. (2008). Why plea-bargaining fails to achieve results in so many criminal justice systems: A new framework for assessment. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 15(3), 323-358.
Harahap, M. Y. (2006). Discussion of Problems and Application of KUHAP: Investigation and Prosecution Second Edition/M. Yahya Harahap.
Harris, J. W. (1997). Legal philosophies.
Hughes, G. (1980). Pleas Without Bargains. Rutgers L. Rev., 33, 753.
Iswara, I. M. A. M. (2017). Strengthening the Prosecutor's Office in Handling Criminal Cases Through Plea Barganing. Advocacy Journal, 7(1), 72913.
Joko, D. J. S., & SH, M. H. (2020). The Development of the Criminal Justice System in Indonesia. Kepel Press.
Kbbi, K. (2016). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (KBBI). Ministry of Education and Culture.
Kerper, H. B., & Israel, J. H. (1979). Introduction to the criminal justice system. West Publishing Company.
Langbein, J. H. (1979). Understanding the short history of plea bargaining. Law & Society Review, 13(2), 261-272.
Latifah, M. (2016). The Exceptional Strip Provisions in the Criminal Procedure Bill. State of Law: Building Law for Justice and Prosperity, 5(1), 31-45.
Lili, R., & Rasjidi, I. T. (2004). Fundamentals of Legal Philosophy and Theory. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
McGregor, J. L. (1987). Chhatrapati Singh," Law From Anarchy to Utopia.". Philosophy in Review, 7(9), 377-379.
Mertokusumo, S. (2009). Indonesian civil procedure law.
Mohapatra, S., & Saksena, H. (2009). Plea Bargain: A Uniqie Remedy. Last Modified.
Morrison, W. (2016). Jurisprudence: From the Greeks to Post-Modernity. Routledge-Cavendish.
Mulgan, T. (2019). Utilitarianism. Cambridge University Press.
Noorsanti, I. A., & Yudhanti, R. (2023). Jeremy Bentham's Legal Expediency Relevance to Government Policy through Village Fund Direct Cash Assistance. Sultan Jurisprudance: Journal of Legal Science Research, 3, 183-193.
Pratiwi, E., Negoro, T., & Haykal, H. (2022). Jeremy Bentham's Utilitarianism Theory: Legal Objective or Legal Product Testing Method? Journal of the Constitution, 19(2), 268-293.
Ramadhan, C. R. (2013). Special Track & Plea Bargaining; Similar but Not the Same". Indonesian Judicial Monitoring Society, Faculty of Law, University of Indonesia (MaPPI FHUI).
Reksodiputro, M. (1997). Human Rights in the Criminal Justice System.
Reksodiputro, M. (2020). Criminal Justice System. Rajawali Press.
Saepullah, A. (2020). John Stuart Mill's Concept of Utilitarianism: Its Relevance to Islamic Sciences or Thought. Aqlania, 11(2), 243-261.
Soekanto, S. (2006). Introduction to legal research. (No Title).
Strang, R. R. (2008). More adversarial, but not completely adversarial: Reform of the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code. Fordham Int'l LJ, 32, 188.
Strier, F. (1992). What can the American adversary system learn from an inquisitional system of justice. Judicature, 76, 109.
Subekti, R. (1969). The law of evidence. (No Title).
Taufik, A. D., Wahyuni, F., & Gunawan, H. (2024). HISTORICAL ANALYSIS AND DEVELOPMENT OF UTILITARIANISM THEORY TOWARDS INDONESIAN LAW. Yurisprudentia: Journal of Economic Law, 10(1), 88-102.
Wardhani, N. K., Gaol, T. M. L., & Syahuri, T. (2024). Application of Utilitarianism Theory Concept in Law Enforcement in Indonesia. Journal of Public Relations, 2(1), 123-130.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Seraphinus Mariano Agung Serman, Umi Rozah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH).
