Agrarian Legal Politics of the Special Region of Yogyakarta in the Indonesian Legal System A Study on Law No 13 of 2012
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i4.1603Keywords:
Agrarian Legal Politics, Special Status of DIY, Sultanate Land, Duchy Land, Land RegulationAbstract
This study examines agrarian legal politics in the Special Region of Yogyakarta (DIY) within the Indonesian legal system, focusing on Law Number 13 of 2012 on the Special Status of DIY. The research analyzes the dynamics of agrarian law in DIY, which is unique due to the coexistence of two legal systems: the national law based on the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA) and the traditional royal agrarian system. The comparison between agrarian legal politics in DIY and national policies reveals significant differences in land law implementation, particularly in the aspects of land inventory, certification, and the legal status of Sultanate and Kadipaten (Duchy) lands. The main challenges identified include the lack of adequate baseline data, community land ownership without legal certainty, and regulatory inconsistencies regarding the management of village land and Sultanate/Duchy lands. Additionally, the disharmony between national agrarian policies and the agrarian legal politics of DIY poses further challenges, especially regarding land ownership and land-use rights for non-indigenous Indonesian citizens. This study recommends a reconstruction of agrarian legal policies at both the national and DIY levels through the revision of regulations such as Law Number 13 of 2012, Government Regulation Number 38 of 1963, and Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997. A more equitable and harmonized approach to the agrarian legal system is essential to ensure legal certainty, social welfare, and alignment between national policies and the special status of DIY.
References
Ani Purwati, S. H., MH, C. P. L., CPCLE, Ccm., CLA, C. T. L., & CLI, Cm. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum Teori dan Praktek. Jakad Media Publishing.
Antoro, K. S. (2014). Legitimasi Identitas Adat dalam Dinamika Politik Agraria (Studi Kasus Lembaga Swapraja di Yogyakarta). BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria Dan Pertanahan, 39, 427–441.
Arba, M. (2021). Hukum Agraria Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.
Atikah, I. (2022). Metode Penelitian Hukum.
Busro, H. A. (1989). Nilai dan berbagai aspeknya dalam hukum: suatu pengantar studi filsafat hukum. Penerbit Bhratara.
Davidson, J. S., Henley, D., & Moniaga, S. (2010). Adat dalam Politik Indonesia. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.
DIALOG, B. L. (2024). REKONSTRUKSI KEWENANGAN PEJABAT PEMBUAT AKTA TANAH SEMENTARA (PPATS) DI INDONESIA BERBASIS KEADILAN. Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang.
Elli Ruslina, S. H. (2012). Dasar perekonomian Indonesia dalam penyimpangan mandat konstitusi UUD negara tahun 1945 (Vol. 1). Total Media.
Hadisuprapto, P. (2006). Peradilan Restoratif: Model Peradilan Anak Indonesia Masa Datang.
Jati, W. R. (n.d.). Politik Agraria Di Yogyakarta: Identitas Partrimonial & Dualisme Hukum Agraria (Politic Of Agrarian In Yogyakarta; Patrimonial Identity 7 Agrarian Law Dualism). Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 11.
Manggala, I. S. A. (2018). HUBUNGAN KELEMBAGAAN ANTARA BADAN PERTANAHAN NASIONAL DENGAN KRATON NGAYOGYAKARTA DALAM PENGELOLAAN PERTANAHAN DI PROVINSI DAERAH ISTIMEWA YOGYAKARTA.
Masyhur, K. (1994). Membina moral dan akhlak.
Mertokusumo, S. (2007). Penemuan hukum sebuah pengantar.
Muhammad Haidar, A. (2020). Pengelolaan Dan Pertanggungjawaban Dana Keistimewaan Di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta Berdasarkan Undangundang No. 13 Tahun 2012 Tentang Keistimewaan Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Universitas Islam Indonesia.
Muhdlor, A. Z. (2012). Perkembangan metodologi penelitian hukum. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 1(2), 189–206.
Muhsin, A., Nafisah, L., & Siswanti, Y. (2019). Surat Kekancingan Tanah Sultan Ground.
Notonagoro, S. (1975). Pancasila secara ilmiah populer. Pantjuran Tudjuh.
PENYUSUN, T. I. M. (n.d.). MENUJU KEPASTIAN HUKUM ATAS TANAH: KASULTANAN DAN.
Samekto, F. X. A. (2015). Normativitas Keilmuan Hukum Dalam Perspektif Aliran Pemikiran Neo-Kantian. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 44(1), 11–17.
Samsuri, M. (2018). Konsep Keadilan Hukum (Konsep Barat, Konsep Islam, Dan Konsep Pancasila). Mamba’ul’Ulum, 45–60.
Santoso, M. A. (2013). Perkembangan Konstitusi Di Indonesia. Yustisia, 2(3).
Sardar, Z. (1985). Islamic futures: The shape of ideas to come. Mansell.
Sari, I. (2020). Hak-hak atas tanah dalam sistem hukum pertanahan di Indonesia menurut Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria (UUPA). Jurnal Mitra Manajemen, 9(1).
Sarjita, S. (2020). Pengaruh kepercayaan dan keamanan terhadap minat beli konsumen secara online pada situs olx. Jurnal Bisnis, Manajemen, Dan Akuntansi, 7(1), 69–82.
Sarwono, S. W., Soemitro, D. S., & Higginbotham, N. (1998). A Social Psychological Study of Diarrhoeal Disease in Indonesia. South Pacific Journal of Psychology, 10(2), 68–70.
Shihab, M. Q. (1996). Wawasan Al-Quran. Bandung: Mizan.
Sibarani, K. N. P. (2022). Rekonstruksi Pendaftaran Tanah hak Guna Usaha Perseroan Terbatas Perkebunan Nusantara II Berbasis Nilai Keadilan. Universitas Islam Sultan Agung (Indonesia).
Soedarisman, P. (1984). Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Gadjah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta.
Soekanto, S. (1977). Kesadaran hukum dan kepatuhan hukum. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 7(6), 462–471.
Soekanto, S. (2006). Pengantar penelitian hukum. (No Title).
Sulistio, M. (2020). Politik Hukum Pertanahan Di Indonesia. Jurnal Education and Development, 8(2), 105.
Susilo, A. B. (2011). Penegakan Hukum yang Berkeadilan dalam Perspektif Filsafat Hermeneutika Hukum: Suatu Alternatif Solusi terhadap Problematika Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia. Perspektif, 16(4), 214–226.
Triningsih, A., & Aditya, Z. F. (2019). Pembaharuan Penguasaan Hak Atas Tanah Dalam Perspektif Konstitusi. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 8(3), 329.
Wangi, N. K. P. S. S., Dantes, K. F., & Sudiatmaka, K. (2023). Analisis Yuridis Hak Ulayat Terhadap Kepemilikan Tanah Adat Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 Tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-Pokok Agraria. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sui Generis, 3(3), 112–121.
Widodo, I. G. (2011). Sistem Penetapan Gubernur Kepala Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta Dalam Sistem Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Berdasarkan Pasal 18 Ayat (4) UUD 1945. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 11(2), 316–334.
Winarni, C. (2022). Peran PPAT Dalam Jual Beli Hak Atas Tanah Yang Berstatus Sengketa (Studi Kasus di Kabupaten Klaten). Universitas Islam Sultan Agung (Indonesia).
Zoelva, H. (2009). Negara Hukum Dalam Perspektif Pancasila. Sumber: Http://Www. Setneg. Go. Id/Index. Php
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jamaluddin Mahasari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH).
