Legal Effects Incompatibility of the Principal Agreement with Additional Agreements
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i4.1699Keywords:
Guarantee Agreement, Principal Agreement, Supplementary AgreementAbstract
The provision of credit facilities by financial institutions and banking institutions is fraught with various risks, including defaults or non-payment by debtors. To anticipate such risks, lawmakers have provided creditors with general security facilities, as stipulated in Articles 1131 and 1132 of the Indonesian Civil Code. Under this general security, creditors are not given any special treatment in fulfilling their receivables. Consequently, creditors often feel that general security alone is insufficient. Therefore, creditors require debtors to provide specific collateral for debt repayment. The provision of such specific collateral is formalized in a security agreement made between the creditor and the debtor. This study aims to further examine the relationship between the principal agreement and the security agreement, as well as the legal consequences arising from a security agreement that does not conform to the principal agreement. The research adopts a conceptual approach and a statutory approach. Through this method, it can be determined that the security agreement must comply with the principal agreement as long as the parties do not agree otherwise or deviate from the applicable legal provisions. The explanation of Article 11, paragraph (1), No. 4 of the 1996 Mortgage Law
References
Abdulkadir Muhammad ,“Hukum Perdata Indonesia”, Citra Aditya Bakti. Volume 6., Bandung 2019.., h. 295.
Abdulkadir Muhammad, Hukum Perjanjian, Cetakan ke-3, PT Alumni, Bandung, 2006, hlm. 24
Aptina Aptina, “Kekuatan Mengikat Klausula Addendum Mengenai Besarnya Bunga Pinjaman Yang Dibuat Delapan Bulan Setelah Perjanjian Utang Piutang Dibuat,” Jurnal Education and Development9, no. 4 (2021): 205–10
Arasy Pradana A. Azis, “Hak Tanggungan sebagai Satu-Satunya Hak Jaminan atas Tanah,” 2020, https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/hak-tanggungan-sebagai-satu-satunya-hak-jaminan-atas-tanah-lt5e67122a1211f.
Bahsan, M. 2010. Hukum Jaminan Dan Jaminan Kredit Perbankan Indonesia. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada
Buku ke III Buku Undang Undang Hukum Perdata tentang perikatan
Frieda Husni Hasbullah, Hukum Kebendaan Perdata Jilid II: Hak-Hak Yang Memberi Jaminan (Jakarta: Ind-Hill Co, 2005
Gentur Cahyo Setiono, “Jaminan Kebendaan Dalam Proses Perjanjian Kredit Perbankan (Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Jaminan Benda Bergerak Tidak Berwujud),” Transparansi Hukum 1, no. 1 (2018).
Hasbullah, F. H. 2005. Hukum Kebendaan Perdata Jilid II: Hak-Hak Yang Memberi Jaminan. Jakarta: Ind-Hill Co
HS Salim, Perkembangan Hukum Jaminan di Indonesia (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2008)
Inri Januar, “Kewajiban dan Tanggung Jawab Memenuhi Prestasi dalam Hukum Jaminan,” to-ra 2, no. 1 (2016): 287–94.
Jefri Purnama, “Analisis dampak Keabsahan Perjanjian Fidusia (Studi Kasus: Perjanjian Fidusia Antara PT. X Dengan Bank B),” Era Hukum-Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum 18, no. 1 (2020), doi:10.24912/erahukum.v18i1.9812
M. Bahsan, Hukum Jaminan dan Jaminan Kredit Perbankan Indonesia (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2007)
M. Kholidin, Hukum Jaminan (Hak-hak Jaminan, Hak Tanggungan dan Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan, Cet. V, Maret 2023, Laksbang Justitia, Yogyakarta, 2023, h. 37
Muhammad Syaifuddin, Hukum Kontrak: Memahami Kontrak dalam Perspektif Filsafat, Teori, Dogmatik, dan Praktik Hukum(Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2012).
Pasal 1131 Undang Undang Hukum Perdata
Pasal 1320 Kitab Undang Undang Hukum Perdata tentang syarat sah perjanjian
Pasal 138 ayat 1 Undang Undang Hukum Perdata
Peter Mahmud Marzuki ,“Penelitian Hukum”, Yuridika. Volume 16. No.2, Maret 2001.., h. 103. (selanjutya disingkat Peter Mahmud Marzuki – I)
Ridwan Khairandy, Hukum Kontrak Indonesia, Cetakan Pertama, FH UII Press, Yogyakarta, 2013, hlm. 278
Rista, R, Dwi Suryahartati dan M. Amin Qodri, “Pelaksanaan Kontrak Kerja Konstruksi Antara Dinas Pendidikan Provinsi Jambi Dengan CV. Analis Konstruksi”. Jurnal. Volume 1 Nomor 3. Oktober 2020. Faculty of Law, Jambi University, http://onlinejournal.unja.ac.id/zaaken. Diakses 24 Maret 2025
Rusli Hardijan, Hukum Perjanjian Indonesia dan Common Law. cet. ke-2, Pustaka Sinar Harapan, Jakarta 2008, hlm. 67
Setiono, “Jaminan Kebendaan Dalam Proses Perjanjian Kredit Perbankan (Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Jaminan Benda Bergerak Tidak Berwujud).”
Sigit Nurhadi Nugraha, “Cidera Janji (Wanprestasi) Dalam Perjanjian Fidusia Berdasarkan Pasal 15 Ayat (3) UU Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor: 18/PUU-XVII/2019,” Al WASATH Jurnal Ilmu Hukum2, no. 2 (2021): 77–92
Sutarno, Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Perdata, (Jakarta, PT. Pradnya Paramitha, 2003), h.145.
Tajuddin Noor, Masnun, & Kahfi Ambawa Alkaf. (2022). Aspek Hukum Perjanjian Pinjaman Online. Jurnal Hukum Dan Kemasyarakatan Al-Hikmah
Thomas Suyatno, Dasar-Dasar Perkreditan, (Jakarta, PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama,1995), h.69.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rosita Linda Zamirah, Habib Adjie
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH).
