The Legal Status of MoU as a Contract in BUMN Cooperation Agreements (Study of Denpasar Court Decision Number 419/PDT.G/2012/PN.DPS)

Authors

  • Velliana Tanaya Faculty of Law, Pelita Harapan University
  • Celine Alexia Yap Faculty of Law, Pelita Harapan University, Banten, Indonesia
  • Danishel Subiran Faculty of Law, Pelita Harapan University, Banten, Indonesia
  • Lauren Angel Gunawan Faculty of Law, Pelita Harapan University, Banten, Indonesia
  • Marvino Nathanael Singgih Faculty of Law, Pelita Harapan University, Banten, Indonesia
  • Dwi Putra Nugraha Faculty of Law, Pelita Harapan University, Banten, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i4.1746

Keywords:

Default, MoU, Agreement, BUMN

Abstract

Performance is an obligation where one or both parties have the responsibility to fulfill a condition that has been agreed upon in the agreement. However, if a performance is not performed or even violated, it can lead to default. In some instances, default might occur on the basis of a breach to a document that is generally considered non-binding, such as an MoU which turns out to be legally enforceable if it fulfills the elements of a valid agreement. In Denpasar Court Decision Number 419/PDT.G/2012/PN.DPS, the Defendant, a State-owned enterprise (BUMN), was proven to have committed a default. Therefore, there is a need to strengthen regulation and supervision to ensure the accountability of BUMN without hampering their operational independence. This paper uses a normative-empirical research method that examines the practical implementation of legal provisions and observes legal interactions that occur in society. Therefore, The Legal Status of MoU as a Contract in BUMN Cooperation Agreements (Study of Denpasar Court Decision Number 419/PDT.G/PN/DPS) is written

References

Ardiansyah, W., & Anna Erliyana. (2022). Status Direksi BUMN selaku Penyelenggara Negara Lainnya dalam ketentuan Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan Pasal 87. Jurnal Transparansi Hukum.

Arifardhani, Y. (2019). Kemandirian Kemandirian Badan Usaha Milik Negara: Persinggungan Antara Hukum Privat Dan Hukum Publik. Otentik’s: Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan, 1(1).

Auli, Prokol. (2024, February 26). Bunyi Pasal 1243 KUH Perdata tentang Wanprestasi. Hukum online. https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/bunyi-pasal-1243-kuh-perdata-tentang-wanprestasi-lt65dc608264499/

Ernst Utrecht. (1956). Pengantar dalam hukum Indonesia.

Edi, Krisharyanto (2005). ANATOMI SUATU PERJANJIAN.

Kementerian Badan Usaha Milik Negara Republik Indonesia. (2022). Tugas Pokok dan Fungsi. Kementerian Badan Usaha Milik Negara Republik Indonesia.

Nafiatul Munawaroh. (2024, August 23) Perbedaan MoU dan Perjanjian atau Kontrak. Hukum online. https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/perbedaan-kontrak-dan-mou-lt514689463d4b2/

Moh Gandara. (2020). Kewenangan Atribusi, Delegasi, dan Manda. Khazanah Hukum.

Muhammad, A. (2004). Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum. PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Populix. (2023, December 14). Wanprestasi Adalah : Pengertian, Penyebab, Unsur, dan Hukum. Populix. https://info.populix.co/articles/wanprestasi-adalah/

Sari, M. L. (2020). Keabsahan Penunjukan Pelaksana Tugas Direksi oleh Dewan Komisaris Untuk Mengisi Jabatan Anggota Direksi yang Lowong Pada BUMN (Persero). Jatiswara

Sovia Hasanah. (2016, November 02). Pengertian Atribusi, Delegasi, dan Mandat. Hukum Online.

Tim Hukumonline. (2022, May 17) 5 Asas-Asas Hukum Perdata terkait Perjanjian. Hukum Online.

Tim Hukumonline. (2024, March 29) Pengertian Wanprestasi, Akibat, dan Penyelesaiannya. Hukum online. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/unsur-dan-cara-menyelesaikan-wanprestasi-lt62174878376c7/

Velliana Tanaya. (2021) Penerapan Pembatasan Sosial Berskala Besar (PSBB) Akibat Pandemi Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Sebagai Force Majeure Dalam Kontrak.

Wahyuni, W. (2023, May 8). Tiga Jenis Metodologi untuk Penelitian Skripsi Jurusan Hukum. Hukumonline. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/tiga-jenis-metodologi-untuk-penelitian-skripsi-jurusan-hukum-lt6458efc23524f/#:~:text=Metode%20penelitian%20yang%20digunakan%20untuk,dan%20penelitian%20hukum%20normatif%2Dempiris.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-11

How to Cite

Tanaya, V., Yap, C. A., Subiran, D., Gunawan, L. A., Singgih, M. N., & Nugraha, D. P. (2025). The Legal Status of MoU as a Contract in BUMN Cooperation Agreements (Study of Denpasar Court Decision Number 419/PDT.G/2012/PN.DPS). Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 5(4), 3082–3093. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i4.1746

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 4 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Velliana Tanaya, Celine Alexia Yap, Danishel Subiran, Lauren Angel Gunawan, Marvino Nathanael Singgih, Dwi Putra Nugraha

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:

  1. The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
  2. The author acknowledges that the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
  3. Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH).