An Analysis of Negligence Committed by Members of the Indonesian National Police (POLRI) in a Criminal Case: A Case Study of Decision Number 55/Pid.B/2024/PN Plk

Authors

  • Sarah Universitas Palangka Raya, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia
  • Kristian Universitas Palangka Raya, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia
  • Claudia Yuni Pramitha Universitas Palangka Raya, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i5.1809

Keywords:

Culpa, Police Accountability, Law Enforcement

Abstract

Police officers' culpa in carrying out their duties has a serious impact on the justice system and the accountability of the police institution. This study analyzes the case of Decision No. 55/Pid.B/2024/PN Plk to evaluate the legal process in dealing with the culpa of officers that led to death and serious injury. The results showed that the lenient verdict against the defendant did not reflect substantive justice and created a crisis of public confidence in the legal system. Lack of transparency in investigations and weak regulations on the use of force in the police force exacerbate this situation. Inequality in law enforcement between officers and civilians exacerbates injustice in the criminal justice system. In recent years, a number of cases involving members of the police as perpetrators of crimes, especially those related to violence, have reduced the positive image of the police in the eyes of the public. One of the most prominent cases was a shooting committed by a police officer in Palangkaraya, Central Kalimantan, which involved culpa and abuse of authority. From 2023 to 2025, two shooting incidents involving members of the National Police occurred in this region, with most of the victims being civilians. These cases illustrate not only individual errors in the performance of duties, but also weaknesses in POLRI's internal control system. These shootings by police officers raise questions about causal factors, such as culpa in supervision, abuse of authority, mental health problems, and inability to manage emotions under pressure. Therefore, reforms in oversight mechanisms, increased transparency in the judiciary, and strengthened regulations related to police accountability are needed to ensure fairer law enforcement. In addition, protection for victims must be strengthened so that justice is not only oriented towards the perpetrators but also towards the rights of victims and their families. Legal reforms should include improvements to police operational standards so that the use of force remains in accordance with the principles of human rights and the rule of law. These reforms are expected to make the criminal justice system more effective in enforcing the law fairly and increase public confidence in the police institution.

References

Apriani, A., Sahari, A., & Perdana, S. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Yang Berhadapan Dengan Hukum Didasarkan Atas Asas Equality Before The Law. Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum, 5(2), 519–532.

Azra, D. N., Aulia, A., Qutrunnadaa, F. A., & Diaz, Y. (2024). Faktor Penentu dalam Vonis Pembunuhan Berencana: Analisis Kritis Pasal 340 KUHP dan Hak Terdakwa. Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, 4(1), 61–68.

Bangkal, T. A. S. untuk M. A. B. (2023). Peristiwa Kekerasan dan Pelanggaran HAM: Krisis Kemanusiaan dan Keadilan di Bangkal - Seruyan 7 Oktober 2023. https://sawitwatch.or.id/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/2023.10.15.-temuan-Awal-Peristiwa-Kekerasan-dan-Pelanggaran-HAM-di-Bangkal-.pdf

Bangkal, T. A. S. untuk M. A. B. (2024). Skenario Busuk Proses Peradilan Terdakwa Anggota Kepolisian Penembak Demonstran di Bangkal-Seruyan: Vonis 10 Bulan Penjara Tidak Berpihak Pada Keadilan. Https://Kontras.Org/. https://kontras.org/artikel/skenario-busuk-proses-peradilan-terdakwa-anggota-kepolisian-penembak-demonstran-di-bangkal-seruyan-vonis-10-bulan-penjara-tidak-berpihak-pada-keadilan

Dewa, M. J., Sensu, L., Haris, O. K., Tatawu, G., Sinapoy, M. S., & Sunoto, F. G. (2023). Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Pejabat Kepolisian dalam Penerimaan Anggota Polri. Halu Oleo Legal Research, 5(1), 143–156.

Disemadi, H. S. (2022). Lenses of Legal Research: A Descriptive Essay on Legal Research Methodologies. Journal of Judicial Review, 24(2), 289–304. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37253/jjr.v24i2.7280

Hasibuan, E. S. (2023). Buku Ajar Hukum Kepolisian. Green Publisher Indonesia.

ID, B. (2024). Tim Advokasi Temukan Fakta Ganjil Peradilan Polisi Pembunuh Gijik. Https://Www.Teras.Id/. https://www.teras.id/read/561129/tim-advokasi-temukan-fakta-ganjil-peradilan-polisi-pembunuh-gijik

Ilchi, O. S., Frank, J., & Hickling, S. J. (2022). Policing the police: Predicting citizen support for police accountability. Police Practice and Research, 23(6), 722–738.

Indonesia, B. (2023). Konflik sawit dan penembakan berujung kematian warga di Seruyan: Akar persoalan muncul belasan tahun lalu, kenapa tak kunjung selesai? Https://Www.Bbc.Com/. https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/indonesia-67052295

Indonesia, C. (2023). Polisi Tangkap 20 Warga Bangkal Seruyan Saat Aksi, Disebut Bawa Senpi. Https://Www.Cnnindonesia.Com/. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20231007183041-12-1008380/polisi-tangkap-20-warga-bangkal-seruyan-saat-aksi-disebut-bawa-senpi

Iwansyah, I., & Hoesein, Z. A. (2025). Problematika Penegakan Kode Etik Kepolisian sebagai Akibat Menurunnya Integritas Kepolisian Republik Indonesia di Masyarakat. Jurnal Retentum, 7(1), 132–144.

Pradana, M. A. (2024). PARAMETER OVERMACHT (KEADAAN MEMAKSA) DALAM PENGGUNAAN SENJATA API OLEH KEPOLISIAN. Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang.

Purnama, I. K. A. (2018). Transparansi Penyidik Polri dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia. PT. Refika Aditama.

Rengganis, M. T. (2024). Curi Mobil hingga Bunuh Warga Kota Palangkaraya, Brigadir Anton Kurniawan Positif Gunakan Sabu. Https://Www.Tempo.Co/. https://www.tempo.co/hukum/curi-mobil-hingga-bunuh-warga-kota-palangkaraya-brigadir-anton-kurniawan-positif-gunakan-sabu-1184918

Rizali, R. (2024). Oknum polisi penembak seorang warga Desa Bangkal didakwa pasal berlapis. Https://Kalteng.Antaranews.Com/. https://kalteng.antaranews.com/berita/686934/oknum-polisi-penembak-seorang-warga-desa-bangkal-didakwa-pasal-berlapis

Sahala, R. (2024). Insiden Tewasnya Gijik di Seruyan, Anggota Polri Divonis 10 Bulan Penjara. Https://Www.Liputan6.Com/. https://www.liputan6.com/regional/read/5616759/insiden-tewasnya-gijik-di-seruyan-anggota-polri-divonis-10-bulan-penjara

Saputra, R., Sinaulan, R. L., & Farhana, F. (2023). Peranan Detasemen Khusus 88 Anti-Teror dalam penanganan tindak pidana terorisme dalam perspektif hak asasi manusia. Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia, 2(9), 2764–2786.

SriwidodoJoko. (2019). Kajian hukum pidana Indonesia. Kepel Press.

Suprayitno, D., & Widiastuti, V. (2023). Studi Pemulihan Citra Polri dengan Metode Analisis Isi Media dalam Teks Dialog Kapolri di Televisi Berita. Avant Garde, 11(1), 148–164.

Toha, H. T. F. (2024). Tanggung Jawab Oknum Kepolisian Yang Bertindak Represif Dalam Pengamanan Demonstrasi Anarkis. LEX PRIVATUM, 13(2).

Trisnawati, S. (2024). Solidaritas untuk Bangkal Laporkan Polda Kalteng Kepada Ombudsman. Https://Www.Rri.Co.Id/. https://www.rri.co.id/daerah/599915/solidaritas-untuk-bangkal-laporkan-polda-kalteng-kepada-ombudsman

Weissinger, J. (2019). Content and Competence: A Descriptive Approach to the Concept of Rights. Mohr Siebeck

Downloads

Published

2025-06-18

How to Cite

Sarah, Kristian, & Pramitha, C. Y. (2025). An Analysis of Negligence Committed by Members of the Indonesian National Police (POLRI) in a Criminal Case: A Case Study of Decision Number 55/Pid.B/2024/PN Plk. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 5(5), 3317–3329. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i5.1809