The Principle of Beneficence of Doctor-Patient Communication Regarding the Implementation of the Hospital Code of Ethics in Health Services

Authors

  • Ani Purwati Universitas Sahid, Indonesia
  • Gita Ruslita Universitas Sahid, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i6.1867

Keywords:

Principle of Beneficence, Hospital Code of Ethics, Informed Consent, Ethics Committee, Malpractice

Abstract

The principle of beneficence as the main ethical basis in medical practice plays an important role in building communication between doctors and patients according to the hospital code of ethics. This article carefully analyzes how beneficence plays a role as an ethical obligation as well as a legal norm in the provision of health services. Based on normative legal analysis and a cross-disciplinary approach, the discussion shows the obligation of doctors to prioritize patient welfare, not only through clinical actions, but also through honest, empathetic communication, and based on informed consent. In the Indonesian context, which is characterized by social and cultural diversity and changes in digital health services, the implementation of beneficence must be able to overcome structural and ethical challenges. This study also describes how hospital-oriented ethical governance, such as the Hospital Ethics and Law Committee, can implement the principle of beneficence to avoid malpractice and strengthen public trust in health institutions. The latest empirical data and international policy frameworks such as the Universal Declaration of Bioethics and Human Rights from UNESCO, this article suggests a model of ethical communication as an important element of justice in health services. Finally, beneficence must be institutionalized not only as a personal contribution, but also as a systematic standard that ensures fair, empowering, and rights-based patient care.

References

Almassi, B. (2018). Medical Error and Moral Repair. International Journal of Applied Philosophy, 32(2), 143–154.

Antara News. (2024). RS Kanker Dharmais raih dua penghargaan Healthcare Asia Awards 2024. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/4034985

Arnett, R. C., Fritz, J. M. H., & Bell, L. M. (2009). Communication ethics literacy: Dialogue and difference. SAGE Publications, Inc.

Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. (2020). Australian Charter of Healthcare Rights. https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/publications

Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (1994). Principles of biomedical ethics. Edicoes Loyola.

Burris, S., Ashe, M., Levin, D., Penn, M., & Larkin, M. (2016). A transdisciplinary approach to public health law: the emerging practice of legal epidemiology. Annual Review of Public Health, 37(1), 135–148.

Cicendo Eye Hospital. (2022). Laporan Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah (LAKIP) 2022. https://www.cicendoeyehospital.org

de Zulueta, P. (2018). Truth, trust and the doctor–patient relationship. In Primary care ethics (pp. 1–24). CRC Press.

Dharmais Cancer Hospital. (2023). Rencana Strategis Bisnis RS Kanker Dharmais 2020–2024. Jakarta: Dharmais Cancer Hospital.

Emanuel, E. J. (2008). The Oxford textbook of clinical research ethics. Oxford University Press.

Gillon, R. (1994). Medical ethics: four principles plus attention to scope. Bmj, 309(6948), 184.

Habermas, J. (1985). The theory of communicative action: Volume 1: Reason and the rationalization of society (Vol. 1). Beacon press.

Koivusilta, L. K., Acacio-Claro, P. J., Mattila, V. M., & Rimpelä, A. H. (2024). Health and health behaviours in adolescence as predictors of education and socioeconomic status in adulthood–a longitudinal study. BMC Public Health, 24(1), 1178.

Komnas HAM. (2023). Laporan Tahunan Pengaduan Pelayanan Publik Bidang Kesehatan. Jakarta: Komnas HAM.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Denzin, N. K. (2000). The handbook of qualitative research. Sage.

Liu, Y., & Duarte, H. (2023). Repairing public trust through communication in health crises: a systematic review of the literature. Public Management Review, 1–21.

Maikel, M. P., Jak, Y., & Hutapea, F. (2024). Peran Komite Etik dan Hukum Rumah Sakit Dalam Peningkatan Mutu Pelayanan, Keselamatan Pasien, dan Penyelesaian Sengketa Medik Di Rumah Sakit Syarif Hidayatullah Tahun 2023. Journal Of The Indonesian Medical Association, 74(4), 183–189.

Perhimpunan Rumah Sakit Seluruh Indonesia. (2015). Kode Etik Rumah Sakit Indonesia (Kodersi) Dan Penjelasannya. Jakarta: Persi, 1–55.

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 17 Tahun 2023 tentang Kesehatan. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2023 Nomor 91.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 29 Tahun 2004 tentang Praktik Kedokteran.

World Medical Association. (2024). Declaration on Ethical Patient Care in the Digital Era. Geneva: WMA Publications.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-20

How to Cite

Purwati, A., & Ruslita, G. (2025). The Principle of Beneficence of Doctor-Patient Communication Regarding the Implementation of the Hospital Code of Ethics in Health Services. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 5(6), 4606–4619. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i6.1867