The Application of Trial as an Adult Concept in Indonesia: Justice for Victims in Juvenile Murder Cases
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i5.1950Keywords:
Trial as an Adult, Child Offenders, Victim JusticeAbstract
The increasing incidence of serious crimes committed by juveniles, particularly murder, raises concerns about the adequacy of Indonesia’s juvenile justice system, which emphasizes rehabilitation over retribution. In contrast, the United States applies the "trial as an adult" concept, allowing juveniles to be tried in adult courts under specific conditions. This study employs a normative legal method using statute and comparative approaches to examine the potential application of this concept in Indonesia. It compares Indonesia's child protection-oriented framework with the U.S. waiver of jurisdiction mechanism. The findings reveal a legal gap in Indonesia’s system for handling grave offenses by juveniles, which often fails to provide substantive justice for victims. Therefore, the study proposes a hybrid judicial model that balances child protection with victim justice by introducing a dual-track court system and proportional sentencing tailored to juvenile maturity and offense severity
References
Ayuningtyas, A. D. (2023). KPAI catat 33 kasus pelanggaran hukum libatkan anak di bawah umur. https://goodstats.id/article/kpai-catat-33-kasus-pelanggaran-hukum-libatkan-anak-di-bawah-umur-qgSMA.
Bachmid, A. A. (2025). Perlindungan Anak Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak: Kebijakan dan Pelaksanaannya di Indonesia. Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum 6(1), 104-113.
Bakhtiar, H. S. (2015). Penerapan sanksi pidana dan tindakan terhadap anak menurut UU No. 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. (Skripsi, Universitas Muslim Indonesia).
Bazemore, G. (1999). Crime victims, restorative justice and the juvenile court: Exploring victim needs and involvement in the response to youth crime. International Review of Victimology, 6(4), 295–320.
Butarbutar, E. N. (2018).?Metode penelitian hukum. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Cahyaningsih, D. T., Sulistiyono, A., & Purwadi, H. (2020). Problem of the adult age in the implementation of the Indonesia statutory regulations. PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 17(3), 437–446.
Graber, R. L. (2019). Is it acceptable for juveniles to be tried as adults? (Criminal Justice Capstone Research Paper). Cedarville University, 1-20.
Griffin, F. (2022). When can a child be charged as an adult. Foley Griffin Attorneys at Law. https://www.foleygriffin.com/blog/2022/february/when-can-a-child-be-charged-as-an-adult-/
Haling, S., Halim, P., Badruddin, S., & Djanggih, H. (2018). Perlindungan hak asasi anak jalanan dalam bidang pendidikan menurut hukum nasional dan konvensi internasional. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 48(2), 361–378.
Iftitah, A., Yuliastuti, E., Mawarni, D. O., & Wardani, R. P. (2023). Pertanggungjawaban hukum anak dalam pelaku tindak pidana berat: Pendekatan, dampak, dan implikasi dalam sistem peradilan anak. Birokrasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Negara, 1(2), 152–167.
Komisi Perlindungan Anak Indonesia. (2023). Data kasus perlindungan anak dari pengaduan ke KPAI tahun 2023. https://bankdata.kpai.go.id/tabulasi-data/data-kasus-perlindungan-anak-dari-pengaduan-ke-kpai-tahun-2023.
Markovitz, H. (2012).?Should juveniles be tried as adults?. San Diego: ReferencePoint Press.
Marlina. (2018).?Peradilan pidana anak di Indonesia: Pengembangan konsep diversi dan restorative justice. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Miller, W. R. (2012).?The social history of crime and punishment in America: An encyclopedia (Vols. 1–5). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Mukaaffah, Z., Alizon, J., & Basir. (2022). Efektivitas diversi terhadap anak yang berkonflik dengan hukum. Journal of Sharia and Law, 1(2), 82–96.
Nur, R., & Bakhtiar, H. S. (2020). The imposition of sanctions for children. Hasanuddin Law Review, 6(2), 165–171.
Nur, R., Bakhtiar, H. S., Miqat, N., Darmawati, & Mustawa. (2021). Model of punishment: Juvenile justice systems. Jambura Law Review, 3, 35–56.
Nur, R., Riza, M., Moenta, A. P., & Bakhtiar, H. S. (2020). Sanctions on children: Comparative studies of Indonesia and Netherlands. Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization, 98, 225–232.
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. (1989). Convention on the Rights of the Child. https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-rights-child.
Pradityo, R. (2016). Restorative justice dalam sistem peradilan pidana anak. Jurnal Rechts Vinding Online, 6(4), 319–330.
Schiraldi, V., Chester, L., & Shefner, R. T. (2024). Emerging adult justice: America's recent attempts to apply research to policies and practices. https://www.americanbar.org/groups/criminal_justice/resources/magazine/2024-winter/americas-recent-attempts-apply-research-policies-practices/.
Setyawati, Y., Septiani, Q., Ningrum, R. A., & Hidayah, R. (2021). Imbas negatif globalisasi terhadap pendidikan di Indonesia. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 5(2), 306–315.
Soejono, & Abdurrahman, H. (2003).?Metode penelitian hukum. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
State of Texas. Texas Family Code.
State of Texas. Texas Penal Code.
Tanjung, W. J. (2024). ABG pembunuh-pemerkosa siswi SMP di Palembang lolos dari hukuman mati. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-7585478/abg-pembunuh-pemerkosa-siswi-smp-di-palembang-lolos-dari-hukuman-mati.
U.S. Supreme Court. (2005). Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551.
U.S. Supreme Court. (2012). Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nicholas Christiansen, Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH).
