Legal Analysis of Product Use with Brand Name Riding in Ternate City, Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i5.1980Keywords:
Product, Brand, Piggybacking, Ternate, IndonesiaAbstract
This paper is entitled “Legal Analysis of Product Use with Brand Name Riding in Ternate City”. The existence of a brand has a major impact on business competition as well as on improving economic standards. This research analyzes the use of products that piggyback on the names of well-known brands. This study uses socio-legal research which is a combination of two methods in the form of dogmatic legal research and empirical research. Results show that products that piggyback on well-known brand names is a manifestation of bad faith as well as damaging reputation and deceiving consumers. Several Indonesian regulations prohibit such actions. Although the ban on piracy, counterfeiting, and the commercialization of goods resulting from IPR violations, including trademark piggybacking, should serve as a deterrent against trademark infringement, issues like business actors' ignorance of the law and the imitation culture continue to impede effective law enforcement. The legal ramifications of trademark infringement by piggybacking on brand names then refer to different effects or outcomes that may occur as a result of breaking the law or committing illegal conduct.
References
Amrikasari, R. (2019). Perlindungan Merek Terkenal Berdasarkan Hukum Di Indonesia. Retrieved July 20, 2024, from Hukum Online website: https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/perlindungan-merek-terkenal-berdasarkan-hukum-di-indonesia-lt5941f01d7fa0e/
Arifin, Z., & Iqbal, M. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Merek Yang Terdaftar. Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 5(1), 50.
Arifin, M., & Dimyati, K. (2021). The Role of Transcendence Values in Preventing Intolerance Behavior, Journal of Trancendental Law, 3(2), pp.156-169
Badrulzaman, M. D. (2014). Kompendium Hukum Kekayaan Intelektual. Jakarta: Kencana.
Bainbridge, D. I. (2021). Intellectual Property Law. London: Pearson.
Boen, H. S. (2009). Dapatkah Doktrin Passing Off Diaplikasikan di Indonesia? Retrieved July 20, 2024, from Hukum Online website: https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/dapatkah-doktrin-passing-off-diaplikasikan-di-indonesia-hol20887/
Casavera. (2019). 15 Kasus Sengketa Merek di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Cornish, L., & Aplin. (2019). Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trademarks & Allied Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Djumhana, M., & Djubaedillah, R. (2003). Hak Milik Intelektual: Sejarah, Teori dan Praktiknya di Indonesia. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Engel, J. F., Blackwell, R. D., & Miniard, P. W. (1995). Consumer Behavior. New York: Dryden Press.
Firmansyah, & Hery. (2011). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Merek. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Yustisia.
Fuady, M. (2017). Teori Hukum Pembuktian di Pengadilan. Jakarta: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Harifaningsih, E. (2009). Kasus Merek Dominasi Perkara HaKI. Jakarta: Bisnis Indonesia.
Howells, G., Hans-Wolfgang, & Schulte-Nölke. (2018). The Handbook of Consumer Law. London: Oxford University Press.
Ishida, N. (2021). Thorstein Veblen On Economic Man: Toward A New Method Of Describing Human Nature, Society, And History. Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, 18, 532.
Jones, O., & Cooper, A. (2021). Legal Consequences in Civil and Criminal Law: Comparative Perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Keeling, D. (2020). Trademark Infringement and Passing Off. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Keller, K. L. (2020). Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity. New Jersey: Education.
Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2012). Marketing Management. London, England: Pearson Education.
Mardanugraha, E., Wardhani, S., Ismayadi, B., Bergkamp, D., & Yappy, B. (n.d.). Dampak Ekonomi Pemalsuan Di Indonesia (Economic Impact Of Counterfeiting In Indonesia). Depok: Makara Mas. Retrieved from Eugenia Mardanugraha, Dampak Ekonomi Pemalsuan Di Indonesia (Economic Impact OfCounterfeiting In Indonesia
Marwiyah, S. (2011). Perlindungan Hukum Atas Merek Terkenal. Jurnal Hukum Dan Syari’ah: De Jure, 2(142).
Mayasari, I., & Wijanarko, A. A. (2022). Riset Ungkap Alasan Kelas Menengah Indonesia Doyan Belanja Barang Mewah Palsu. Retrieved July 23, 2024, from Vice website: https://www.vice.com/id/article/riset-tim-universitas-paramadina-sebut-kelas-menengah-indonesia-doyan-belanja-barang-mewah-palsu-38-persen-di-pasaran/
Mirfa, E. (2016). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Merek Terdaftar. Jurnal Hukum: Samudra Keadilan, 11(1), 68.
Nugroho, R. A. (2016). Perlindungan Hukum Pemegang Hak Merek terkenal Asing (Well Know Mark) dari Tindakan Passing Off (Studi Sengketa GS Atas Nama GS Yuasa Corporation). Semarang Law Journal, 5(3), 3.
Rahardjo, S. (2009). Hukum dalam Perspektif Sosial. Jakarta: Genta Publishing.
Risandi, K., & Disemadi, H. S. (2022). Pemalsuan Merek Sepatu Di Indonesia: Pengaturan Dan Sanksi? Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum, 8(2), 323.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.
Salim, H. S. (2013a). Hukum Kekayaan Intelektual di Indonesia. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
Salim, H. S. (2013b). Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen di Indonesia. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
Santosa, A. (2020). Hukum Perlindungan Merek Dagang. Bandung: Mandar Maju.
Sari, M. Y. A. R. (2014). Passing Off Dalam Pendaftaran Merek. Jurnal Yudisial, 7(3), 261.
Setiawan, A., Sulistianingsih, D., & Kusumaningtyas, R.F. (). Eksistensi Pendaftaran Rahasia Dagang Dan Implementasi Perlindungannya (Studi Di Kanwil Kemenkumham Jawa Tengah), Jurnal Law and Justice, 3(2), pp 73-81
Siringoringo, H. (2022). Business Law and Competitive Regulation: The Role of Government in Economic Development. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Solomon, M. R. (2018). Consumer Behavior: Buying, Having, and Being. New Jersey: Pearson.
Suhariyanto, Y. (2019). Aspek Hukum Perlindungan Merek di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press.
Suteki, T., & Galang. (2020). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum: Filsafat, Teori dan Praktik. Depok: RajaGrafindo Persada.
The Government of the Republic of Indonesia. Pasal 9 ayat (3) Undang-undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta (Article 1 paragraph (5) in conjunction with Article 3 of Trademark Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications). , (2014). Indonesia.
The Government of the Republic of Indonesia. Article 1 paragraph (5) in conjunction with Article 3 of Trademark Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications. , (2016). Indonesia.
Thomas J. McCarthy, & Cannon, P. (2008). Manajemen Pemasaran. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
UHI. (2023). Beri Pemahaman Pelindungan KI, DJKI Hadir di Kota Ternate. Retrieved from Directorate General of Intellectual Property website: https://www.dgip.go.id/index.php/artikel/detail-artikel-berita/beri-pemahaman-pelindungan-ki-djki-hadir-di-kota-ternate?kategori=liputan-humas
Wardiono, K. (2019). Prophetic : An Epistemological Offer for Legal Studies, Journal of Trancendental Law, Journal of Transendental Law, Vol. 1, No. 1, Pp.17-41.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mardia Ibrahim, Muhammad Taufik Laode, Nur Aida Ikrima, Arief Budiono
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH).
