Legal Reconstruction of the Distribution of Common Property through a Study of Sociological Jurisprudence

Authors

  • Andi Annisa Nurlia Mamonto Faculty of Law, Yapis Papua University, Papua, Indonesia
  • Viorizza Suciani Putri Faculty of Law, Padjadjaran University, Bandung, Indonesia
  • Nazwa Milka Salsabila Faculty of Law, Cendrawasih University, Papua, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i5.1988

Keywords:

Common Property, Divorce, Sociological Jurisprudence

Abstract

This study examines the division of joint property post-divorce using the sociological jurisprudence framework established by Roscoe Pound, emphasizing critiques of the normative stipulations in Article 97 of the Compilation of Islamic Law, which mandates an arithmetic division into semi-halves. The primary issue analyzed is the degree to which sociological methodologies may discern positive legal deficiencies in achieving substantive justice when the contributions of husband and wife are socially and economically inequitable. The used technique is normative juridical, using a theoretical approach that involves the examination of statutes, regulations, legal theory, and judicial practice. The study's findings indicate that inflexible positive legislation may overlook domestic and non-financial contributions, particularly from the wife. In some verdicts, judges use contra legem as a manifestation of judicial daring to maintain substantive justice grounded in genuine contributions. The sociological jurisprudence method facilitates a contextual and adaptive reconstruction of family law in response to societal processes. The allocation of communal assets should be grounded not only in the idea of formal equality but also in the acknowledgment of genuine contributions that often remain obscured by domestic labor and power dynamics inside the home

References

Abror, H. K. (2020). Hukum perkawinan dan Perceraian. Ladang Kata, Bantul Yogyakarta. http://repository.radenintan.ac.id/12665/1/Hukum%20Perkawinan%20dan%20Perceraian.pdf

As-Suvi, A. Q., & Zainullah, M. (2022). Sociology of Law in the Perspective of Roscoe Pound and Donald Black and its Relevance in the Indonesian Context. Peradaban Journal of Law and Society, 1(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.59001/pjls.v1i2.39

Cotterrell, R. (1984). The sociology of law: An introduction. Austl. JL & Soc’y, 2, 90.

Fineman, M. A. (2014). The Neutered Mother, The Sexual Family and Other Twentieth Century Tragedies. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315021744

Gardner, J. A. (I). (1962). The Sociological Jurisprudence of Roscoe Pound (Part I). Villanova Law Review, 7, 1.

Glendon, M. A. (1989). The Transformation of Family Law: State, Law, and Family in the United States and Western Europe. University of Chicago Press.

Hidayat, D., & Hainadri, H. (2021). Hukum Sebagai Sarana Pembaharuan Dalam Masyarakat (law as a tool of social engineering). DATIN LAW JURNAL, 2(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.36355/dlj.v2i1.566

Kurniawan, M. B. (2017). KONSEP PEMBAGIAN HARTA BERSAMA BERDASARKAN KONTRIBUSI DALAM PERKAWINAN. AHKAM?: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 17(2), Article 2. https://journal.uinjkt.ac.id/index.php/ahkam/article/view/4741

Latipulhayat, A. (2014). Khazanah: Mochtar Kusumaatmadja. PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW), 1(3), Article 3. https://jurnal.unpad.ac.id/pjih/article/view/7100

Leiboff, M. (2004). Legal Theories; in Principle (M. Thomas, Ed.). Wm. W. Gaunt & Sons [distributor].

Mahmud Marzuki, Peter. (2011). Penelitian Hukum. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Matnuh, H. (2017). Law as a Tool of Social Engineering. 118–120. https://doi.org/10.2991/icsse-17.2018.28

McManaman, L. J. (1958). Social Engineering: The Legal Philosophy of Roscoe Pound. St. John’s Law Review, 33, 1.

Munir, A. I. (2025). A Clash of Interests: Evaluating Roscoe Pound’s Theory of Social Engineering. PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF LAW, ANALYSIS AND WISDOM, 4(3), Article 3.

Myers, J., & Krause, H. (2017). Family Law in a Nutshell. McGeorge School of Law Teaching Materials, 1.

Nafi, M., & Solehah, C. M. (2020). Penerapan Teori Keadilan dalam Putusan Harta Bersama (Analisis Perkara Nomor 0346/Pdt. G/2017/PA. Ktb). Jurnal Hadratul Madaniyah, 7(1), 26–33.

Pound, R. (1910). Law in Books and Law in Action. American Law Review, 44, 12.

Pound, R. (2018). The Spirit of the Common Law. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351302722

Pound, R., & DeRosa, M. L. (2017). An Introduction to the Philosophy of Law. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351288880

Syahyu, Y., & Fitriana, D. (2021). Mencari Ilmu (Teori) Hukum Yang Bercirikan Indonesia Berdasarkan Aliran Sociological Jurisprudence. Jurnal Hukum Sasana, 7(1), 140–148. https://doi.org/10.31599/sasana.v7i1.587

Unger, R. M. (1977). Law in Modern Society. Simon and Schuster.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-23

How to Cite

Mamonto, A. A. N., Putri, V. S., & Salsabila, N. M. (2025). Legal Reconstruction of the Distribution of Common Property through a Study of Sociological Jurisprudence. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 5(5), 3392–3401. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i5.1988