Law Enforcement Against Fiduciary Credit Guarantee Embezzlement by Debtors Based on Consumer Financing Agreements

Authors

  • Francisca Andriani Putro Universitas Tarumanagara, Indonesia
  • R. Rahaditya Universitas Tarumanagara, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i6.2199

Keywords:

Law Enforcement,, Embezzlement, Fiduciary Security, Consumer Financing,, Creditor Protection

Abstract

This study examines the efficacy of legal enforcement in addressing the criminal offense of fiduciary collateral misappropriation by debtors under consumer financing agreements, with reference to Supreme Court Decision No. 419K/Pid.Sus/2021. Employing a normative- descriptive methodology, the research adopts statutory and case law analysis. The findings reveal inadequacies in current enforcement mechanisms, as the sentencing framework imposes disproportionately lenient penalties, thereby undermining their deterrent function. Further, the study identifies a normative conflict between the sanction provisions of Article 36 of Law No. 42 of 1999 on Fiduciary Security and Article 372 of the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP), which creates legal uncertainty and diminishes creditor protection. The analysis underscores the imperative of enhancing public legal awareness and fostering academic engagement in the dissemination of fiduciary law principles. To mitigate risks, the study proposes legislative reforms to harmonize penal sanctions and advocates for the institutional adoption of prudential measures by financing entities to deter fiduciary collateral fraud.

References

Asshiddiqie, J. (2006). Pengantar ilmu hukum tata negara.

Butarbutar, S. A. (2023). Juridical review of the crime of embezzlement in fiduciary guarantee cases in Indonesia (Case study of Purwakarta District Court Decision Number 227/Pid.B/2012/PN.Pwk). Journal of the Rectum, 5(1).

Dewi, P. K., & Arifin, I. (2021). Legal analysis of unauthorized collateral transfers in fiduciary arrangements. Jurnal Hukum Respublica, 21(1), 45–52.

Gunanegara, S. H. (2022). Mafia Tanah & Primum Remedium. GOOGLE PLAY BOOK.

Handayani, I. G. A. K. R., & Hadi, I. M. M. (2018). Civil law enforcement for fiduciary embezzlement. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara, 9(2), 66–74.

Lestari, P., & Sari, M. D. (2019). Legal certainty in fiduciary guarantees as collateral. Journal of Law and Policy Transformation, 4(1), 23–30.

Nugroho, D., & Hakim, A. R. (2017). The rise of financial crimes in consumer credit: A fiduciary law perspective. Indonesian Journal of Legal Studies, 5(2), 110–118.

Pratama, R. A., & Nurhidayat, I. (2020). The impact of Constitutional Court Decision No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019 on fiduciary security execution in Indonesia. Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, 9(3), 354–369. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v9i3.45678

Salvia, M. P., & Putri, L. P. Y. K. (2024). Application of Constitutional Court Decision No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019 concerning Fiduciary to the protection of Consumer Rights: Konstitusionalitas Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia dalam Kerangka Perlindungan Hak Konsumen. Jurnal Konstitusi, 21(2), 275–291.

Susanti, H., & Anshori, M. H. (2017). The role of legal socialization in strengthening creditor protection in fiduciary transactions. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 17(3), 342–350.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-24

How to Cite

Putro, F. A., & Rahaditya, R. (2025). Law Enforcement Against Fiduciary Credit Guarantee Embezzlement by Debtors Based on Consumer Financing Agreements. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 5(6), 4695–4706. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i6.2199