The Role of e-Berpadu in Addressing the Lex Imperfecta of Article 143 Paragraph (4) of the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code

Authors

  • Riska Pratiwi Djaman Universitas Dumoga Kotamobagu
  • Jemmy Mokoagow Universitas Dumoga Kotamobagu
  • Hajim Lasabuda Universitas Dumoga Kotamobagu
  • Eldy Noerdin Universitas Dumoga Kotamobagu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2356

Keywords:

e-Berpadu, Lex Imperfecta, Criminal Procedure Law, Case File Access, Rights of the Suspect

Abstract

This study examines the role of the e-Berpadu system in addressing the lex imperfecta nature of Article 143 paragraph (4) of the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), which obliges prosecutors to provide case files to suspects or their legal counsel but prescribes no sanction for non-compliance. The research was conducted at the Kotamobagu District Court using a qualitative approach that combined interviews, observations, document analysis, and focus group discussions. The findings reveal that e-Berpadu enables digital access to case files for legal counsel and supports the fulfillment of the right to information. No significant technical barriers were identified in its implementation. However, the case file access feature is neither a core component of the system’s design nor emphasized in its official dissemination, leaving many defense lawyers unaware of its availability. The study concludes that although e-Berpadu can function as a supplementary tool to ensure access to case files, it cannot substitute the prosecutor’s mandatory obligation under KUHAP

References

Antasari, R. R. (2019). Telaah Terhadap Perkembangan Tipe Tatanan Hukum di Indonesia Perspektif Pemikiran Nonet-Selznick Menuju Hukum yang Berkeadilan. Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syari’ah Dan Masyarakat, 19(1), 103–118. https://doi.org/10.19109/nurani.v19i1.3344

Ariwijaya, A. R., & Samputra, P. L. (2021). Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan Volume, 51(4), 1104–1122. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol51.no4.3303

Candra, A., Danil, E., Elvandari, S., & Robensyah, A. (2024). Efektivitas Sistem E-Berpadu Dalam Perkara Pidana Sebagai Upaya Mewujudkan Peradilan Cepat. UNES Law Review, 6(3), 9278–9283.

Chaerudin, M. A. Y. C., Maskur, A., & Adila, A. H. (2025). Prinsip Keadilan Prosedural Sebagai Landasan Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Kasus Pencurian Ayam. Jurnal USM Law Review, 8(1), 509–529. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v8i1.11770

D’almeida, L. D. (2022). Wrongs and Sanctions in the Pure Theory of Law. Ratio Juris, 35(3), 247–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/raju.12356

Deva Dwi Chandra, Alfaroq, M. I. R., Afifky, I. B., Petra Alfa, A., & Sitepu, S. (2025). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Pelaksanaan Due Process Of Law sebagai Elemen Fundamental untuk Melindungi Hak dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik Volume, 7(2), 188–203. https://journalversa.com/s/index.php/jhkphh

DPR RI. (2025). Rancangan Undang Undang Republik Indonesia tentang Hukum Acara Pidana.

Flora, H. S., Thuong, M. T. H., & Erawati, R. D. (2023). the Orientation and Implications of New Criminal Code: an Analysis of Lawrence Friedman’S Legal System. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 11(1), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v11i1.1169

Galih Orlando. (2022). Efektivitas Hukum dan Fungsi Hukum di Indonesia. Tarbiyah Bil Qalam?: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Dan Sains, 6(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.58822/tbq.v6i1.77

Hanson-DeFusco, J. (2023). What data counts in policymaking and programming evaluation – Relevant data sources for triangulation according to main epistemologies and philosophies within social science. Evaluation and Program Planning, 97(January), 102238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102238

Jusafri, Alimuddin, N. H., & Chairunnas, A. (2024). Disrupsi Teknologi Digital dalam Pelaksanaan Sistem Peradilan Pidana dan Pemenuhan Keadilan di Indonesia. Jurn Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains, 7(9), 3551–3560. https://doi.org/10.56338/jks.v7i9.6212

Ladavac, N. (2016). Coercion and Sanctions as Elements of Normative Systems. In C. B. & N. L. (Eds.) (Ed.), The Force of Law Reaffirmed (Vol. 117, pp. 73–96). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33987-0_5

Lythreatis, S., Singh, S. K., & El-Kassar, A.-N. (2022). The digital divide: A review and future research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121359

Mahkamah Agung RI. (n.d.). Tentang e-Berpadu. Retrieved 3 July 2025, from https://eberpadu.mahkamahagung.go.id/

Marbun, R., Oedoyo, W., & Sinaga, D. M. (2021). Logika Monolog Dalam Trikotomi Relasi Pada Proses Pra-Adjudikasi. Jurnal Usm Law Review, 4(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v4i1.3308

Muhammad Rudi Syahputra. (2024). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum dalam Menyelesaikan Problematika Hukum Kontemporer. Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(2), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.70193/jurisprudensi.v1i02.08

Munir, M. (2022). Ronald Dworkin’s Theory of Integrity, Constructive Interpretation, and the Right Answer Thesis: An Overview. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4098344

Noerdin, E. S. (2025a). Asimetri Perlindungan Hak Tersangka dalam Penerimaan Berkas Perkara Menurut Pasal 143 ayat (4) KUHAP. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 6(7), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v6i7.753

Noerdin, E. S. (2025b). Lex Imperfecta dalam KUHAP. Madza Media.

Pahlevi, S. F. (2022). Pemberantasan Korupsi di Indonesia Perspektif Legal System Lawrence M. Freidmen. Jurnal El-Dusturie, 1(1), 23–43. https://doi.org/10.21154/eldusturie.v1i1.4097

Pengadilan Negeri Kotamobagu. (n.d.). Wilayah Yuridiksi Pengadilan Negeri Kotamobagu. Retrieved 13 June 2025, from https://pn-kotamobagu.go.id/index.php?option=com_sppagebuilder&view=page&id=66&Itemid=572

Pengadilan Negeri Sanana. (n.d.). Petunjuk Teknis e-BERPADU untuk APH dan Umum Advokat. Retrieved 15 June 2025, from https://web.pn-sanana.go.id/pengumuman/petunjuk-teknis-e-berpadu-untuk-aph-dan-umum-advokat/

Peraturan Presiden Nomor 12 Tahun 2025 Tentang Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional Tahun 2025 - 2029, Pub. L. No. 12 (2025).

Rumokoy, D. A., & Maramis, F. (2016). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum (Cet. 3). Rajawali Pers.

Simanungkalit, I. H., & Debora. (2024). Implementasi E-Court sebagai Upaya Modernisasi Administrasi Peradilan di Indionesia. Pakuan Law Review, 10(4), 176–190. https://doi.org/10.33751/palar.v10i4

Singarimbun, D. A., & Pakpahan, K. (2024). Implementation of the Electronic Criminal Case File Transfer System. YURISDIKSI?: Jurnal Wacana Hukum Dan Sains, 20(1), 58–65. https://doi.org/10.55173/yurisdiksi.v20i1.229

Sundusiyah, S., & Hariyanto, E. (2022). Implementasi Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Tentang E-Court Untuk Mewujudkan Asas Sederhana, Cepat Dan Biaya Ringan Di Pengadilan Agama Pamekasan. Arena Hukum, 15(3), 471–498. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2022.01503.2

Tim-IT Development MA RI. (2022). Buku Panduan Sistem Elektronik Berkas Pidana Terpadu. https://pn-sanana.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/4.Pengguna-Rutan-Lapas_e-BERPADU.pdf

United Nations. (2015). Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels. https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal16

Wiraguna, S. A. (2024). Metode normatif dan empiris dalam penelitian hukum: Studi eksploratif di Indonesia. Public Sphere: Jurnal Sosial Politik, Pemerintahan Dan Hukum, 3(3), 57–65. https://doi.org/10.59818/jps.v3i3.1390

Zappalà, S. (2010). The Rights of Victims v. the Rights of the Accused. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 8(1), 137–164. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqq001

Downloads

Published

2025-10-20

How to Cite

Djaman, R. P., Mokoagow, J., Lasabuda, H., & Noerdin, E. (2025). The Role of e-Berpadu in Addressing the Lex Imperfecta of Article 143 Paragraph (4) of the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 6(1), 342–353. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2356