Legal Protection And Certainty Over The Implementation Of Emergency Interim Relief In The Arbitration Dispute Resolution Process In Indonesia

Authors

  • Sandy Sulistiono Universitas Narotama
  • Nynda Fatmawati Octarina Universitas Narotama

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2397

Keywords:

Emergency Interim Relief, Arbitration Law, Legal Certainty

Abstract

This study explores the urgency and legal framework of Emergency Interim Relief (EIR) in Indonesian arbitration law, emphasizing its role in safeguarding parties’ rights and ensuring legal certainty in urgent disputes. EIR, as a temporary measure issued before a full arbitral tribunal is constituted, is crucial for preventing irreparable harm such as asset dissipation or evidence destruction. Although Law No. 30 of 1999 grants tribunals the authority to issue interim measures, its lack of explicit enforcement mechanisms historically limited their effectiveness. The issuance of Supreme Court Regulation No. 3 of 2023 (PERMA 3/2023) marks a significant development by providing procedural clarity, mandating court registration of interim orders, and introducing fixed timelines for enforcement, including for foreign awards. These reforms align Indonesian arbitration practice more closely with international standards and enhance its attractiveness as a dispute resolution hub. However, limitations remain, notably the narrow scope of PERMA 3/2023, which primarily addresses security seizures, and uncertainties regarding the enforceability of emergency awards under institutional rules such as the 2025 BANI Rules.

References

Naveen, D., & Nidhi, B. (2024). A Critical Analysis: Nuances of Interim Relief in International Commercial Arbitration. Jus Corpus LJ, 5, 362.

Turner, R. (2024). Emergency Arbitration: Where Are We Now and Where Do We Go From Here?. Dispute Resolution International, 18(2).

Barreiro Deymonnaz, R. E. (2025). Clash or complementarity? Exploring interim relief powers of emergency arbitrators and dispute adjudication boards. Construction Law International, 20(1).

Agarwal, M., & Saxena, A. (2021). Interim Measures of Protection in Aid of Foreign-Seated Arbitrations: Judicial Misadventures and Legal Uncertainty. NLS Bus. L. Rev., 7, 73.

Zhang, J. (2024). Recognition and Enforcement of Interim Measures Rendered by an Emergency Arbitrator. In The Enforceability of the Interim Measures Granted by an Emergency Arbitrator in International Commercial Arbitration (pp. 157-178). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.

Raj, Y. (2024). Impact of Interim Measures on the Speed and Outcome of Arbitration Proceedings. Jus Corpus LJ, 5, 499.

Krasulova, K. R. (2022). Should I Stay or Should I Go: The Evolution of Emergency Arbitration Procedure within Private International Law. Cardozo Int'l & Comp. L. Rev., 6, 819.

Gandotra, A. (2021). Judicial intervention in granting interim measures in international arbitration. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 38(4), 349-369.

Maxwell, K. (2025). Interim Orders and Emergency Arbitrators in Maritime Arbitration. In Commercial Disputes (pp. 11-24). Informa Law from Routledge.

Zhang, J. (2024). The Enforceability of the Interim Measures Granted by an Emergency Arbitrator in International Commercial Arbitration. Springer Nature.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-02

How to Cite

Sulistiono, S., & Octarina, N. F. (2025). Legal Protection And Certainty Over The Implementation Of Emergency Interim Relief In The Arbitration Dispute Resolution Process In Indonesia. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 6(1), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2397