The Limitations of International Humanitarian Law (IHL) in Protecting Civilians in the Saudi Arabia–Yemen Cross-Border Conflict

Authors

  • Muhamad Silva Maulana Universitas Siber Muhammadiyah

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2450

Keywords:

International Humanitarian Law, Saudi–Yemen Conflict, Civilian Protection, Armed Conflict, International Law

Abstract

The cross-border armed conflict between Saudi Arabia and Yemen since 2015 has triggered the worst humanitarian crisis of this century, with hundreds of thousands of civilians being killed. International Humanitarian Law (IHL) normatively guarantees civilian protection through the principles of distinction, proportionality, military necessity, and humanity. However, the reality shows systematic violations in the form of airstrikes on civilian facilities, blockades resulting in mass starvation, and the indiscriminate use of weapons. This research uses a normative-critical method with a study of primary documents (the 1949 Geneva Conventions, Additional Protocols I & II, UN reports, the ICRC, Amnesty International, and Human Rights Watch) and a case study of the Saudi-Yemeni conflict. The analysis shows that the limitations of IHL are primarily due to the absence of effective enforcement mechanisms, the politicization of the UN Security Council, the asymmetry between state and non-state actors, and the ambiguity of the classification of international and non-international conflicts. In conclusion, although IHL norms are legally strong, their implementation remains weak due to subordination to political and military interests. Therefore, strengthening enforcement mechanisms, reforming international governance, and adapting norms to hybrid conflicts are necessary to strengthen civilian protection in modern armed conflicts.

 

References

Academy of the State Penitentiary Service, Chernihiv, Ukraine, Rebkalo, M. M., Oliinyk, V. S., & Academy of the State Penitentiary Service, Chernihiv, Ukraine. (2022). CORRESPONDENCE OF THE GENEVA CONVENTIONS (1949) WITH THE CONSTITUTIONAL AND MILITARY LEGISLATION OF UKRAINE: LEGAL ANALYSIS. Scientific Herald of Sivershchyna. Series: Law, 2022(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.32755/sjlaw.2022.01.019

Ashri, M. (2019). Reconciliation of Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law in Armed Conflict. Hasanuddin Law Review, 5(2), 209. https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v5i2.1348

Asqool, A. M., Ismail, S. M., & Nordin, R. (2023). THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN DURING ARMED CONFLICTS: ISRAELI VIOLATIONS OF INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW IN THREE WARS IN GAZA. UUM Journal of Legal Studies, 14(2), 535–556. https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2023.14.2.5

Biggio, G. (2025). Regulating non-kinetic effects of cyber operations: The ‘Loss of Functionality’ approach and the military necessity-humanity balance under International Humanitarian Law. Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 30(2), 241–263. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/kraf008

Bower, L. (2022). AI Decision Making to Allocate Government Funds. Human Interaction and Emerging Technologies (IHIET-AI 2022) Artificial Intelligence and Future Applications. https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe100870

Casey-Maslen, S., & Vestner, T. (2022). International Law and Policy on the Protection of Civilians (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009052757

Cronin, B. (2023). Civilian Immunity in Domestic Armed Conflicts. In B. Cronin, Purging the Odious Scourge of Atrocities (1st ed., pp. 157–181). Oxford University PressNew York. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197693308.003.0006

Faragil, I. D., & Yustitianingtyas, L. (2021). Peranan Dewan Keamanan PBB Dalam Penyelesaian Konflik Bersenjata Non-Internasional Di Libya. Wijayakusuma Law Review, 3(01). https://doi.org/10.51921/wlr.v3i01.153

Gaggioli, G., & Kilibarda, P. (2021). Counterterrorism and the risk of over-classification of situations of violence. International Review of the Red Cross, 103(916–917), 203–236. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383121000424

Go?dziewicz, W. (2024). Targeting in the Russian-Ukrainian War: The Crossroads of Legal and Technical Aspects. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Iuridica, 106, 35–53. https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6069.106.03

Gül, Y. E. (2023). The application of the principle of precautions to cyber operations. The Military Law and the Law of War Review, 61(1), 3–38. https://doi.org/10.4337/mllwr.2023.01.01

Kent, A. K. (2019). Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War and Additional Protocol. In F. P. Bernat & K. Frailing (Eds.), The Encyclopedia of Women and Crime (1st ed., pp. 1–5). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118929803.ewac0232

Khan, M., & Ullah, Z. (2020). The Yemen Armed Conflict in the Perspective of International Humanitarian Law. Global Legal Studies Review, V(II), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.31703/glsr.2020(V-II).02

Kubiak, M. (2023). Basic principles of international humanitarian law of armed conflict. Security Dimensions, 46(46), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0054.2235

Mohamed Ahmed Zakaria Shehata, Dr. (2025). The Impact of the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Military Operations in Light of the Rules of International Humanitarian Law. Journal of Law and Emerging Technologies, 4(1), 11–58. https://doi.org/10.54873/jolets.v4i1.196

Muslim, S., Lubis, A. F., & Sahrul, S. (2023). Analisis Peran Keputusan Dewan Keamanan PBB dalam Menentukan Status Hukum Teritorial di Tepi Barat. Jurnal Hukum Dan HAM Wara Sains, 2(11), 1057–1064. https://doi.org/10.58812/jhhws.v2i11.796

Nnawulezi, U., & Magashi, S. B. (2023). Evolving Roles of the International Institutions in the Implementation Mechanisms of the Rules of International Humanitarian Law. Kutafin Law Review, 9(4), 684–712. https://doi.org/10.17803/2313-5395.2022.4.22.684-712

Park, I. (2018). The Right to Life in Armed Conflict (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198821380.001.0001

Saadat Ali Nadeem, Muhammad Faisal, Muhammad Muneeb Raza, & Ishfaq Ahmad. (2023). Conceptualizing the applicability of Non-international armed conflict in the context of International Humanitarian Law. Pakistan Journal of Criminal Justice, 3(1), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.62585/pjcj.v3i1.54

Safdar, M. A., Saadat Ali Nadeem, Syed Muhammad Wafa Abbas Gilani, & Prof. Dr. Rao Imran Habib. (2023). A Comprehensive Review of ICRC’s Role in Promoting the Applicability of International Humanitarian Law. Pakistan Journal of Criminal Justice, 3(1), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.62585/pjcj.v3i1.40

Schaack. (2019). Complex Battlespaces. Oxford University Press.

Schussler, L., Burkle, F. M., & Wren, S. M. (2019). Protecting Surgeons and Patients During Wars and Armed Conflicts: Importance of Predeployment Training on the Geneva Conventions and International Humanitarian Law. JAMA Surgery, 154(8), 683. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0041

Singh, A. K., & Yadav, A. K. (2023). Security of Food, Civilians and Combatants Under Human Rights Laws in Times of War. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(5), e1180. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i5.1180

Van Den Boogaard, J. (2024). Principles of International Humanitarian Law: A New Framework. In S. Sivakumaran & C. C. R. Burne (Eds.), Making and Shaping the Law of Armed Conflict (1st ed., pp. 63–74). Oxford University PressNew York. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197775134.003.0004

Zaid, Z. A., & Aljasmi, N. A. (2024). PROTECTION OF CIVILIANS IN AREAS UNDER THE CONTROL OF ARMED GROUPS. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 12(4), e3396. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v12i4.3396

Downloads

Published

2025-11-15

How to Cite

Maulana, M. S. (2025). The Limitations of International Humanitarian Law (IHL) in Protecting Civilians in the Saudi Arabia–Yemen Cross-Border Conflict. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 6(1), 762–768. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2450