Jambi City Government's Strategy in Overcoming Parental Rejection of Diphtheria Tetanus Immunization at The Talang Bakung Health Center In Jambi City

Authors

  • Repelita Witri Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Wisnuwardhana Malang
  • Marsudi Dedi Putra Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Wisnuwardhana Malang
  • Carolina Kuntardjo Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Wisnuwardhana Malang
  • Imam Ropii Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Wisnuwardhana Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2538

Keywords:

Immunization Refusal, Legal Strategies, Child Health

Abstract

This study aims to identify the factors that cause parents to refuse Diphtheria Tetanus immunization for children's health at the Talang Bakung Health Center, Jambi City, and analyze the legal strategies implemented by the Jambi City Regional Government in overcoming these rejections. The research method used is empirical legal research with a qualitative approach. Data was collected through interviews, observations, and documentation of related parties such as health workers, parents, and local government officials. Data analysis was carried out in a descriptive analytical manner by relating relevant field findings and legal theories. The results of the study showed that immunization refusal by parents was caused by several factors, including concerns about Post-Immunization Adverse Events (AEFIs), lack of understanding of vaccine benefits, the influence of misinformation on social media, and low trust in health workers. Social, cultural, and religious factors also contribute to strengthening resistance to immunization programs. The Jambi City Regional Government implements a persuasive and educational legal strategy by emphasizing increasing public health literacy through integrated socialization, the involvement of religious and community leaders, and the affirmation of legal policies based on Law Number 17 of 2023 concerning Health and Government Regulation Number 28 of 2024. In addition, the Regional Government strengthens legal protection for health workers and regulates the mechanism for handling AEFIs in a transparent manner to foster public trust. This legal strategy has proven effective in reducing immunization refusal rates and increasing community participation, although ongoing efforts are still needed to strengthen legal awareness and overall public health.

References

Affandi, H. (2019). Implementasi Hak atas Kesehatan Menurut Undang-Undang Dasar 1945: Antara Pengaturan dan Realisasi Tanggung Jawab Negara. Jurnal Hukum Positum, 4(1).

Fitriyani, A., Sutrisno, E., & Waluyadi, W. (2020). Kajian Hukum dan Kebijakan dalam Penyelenggaraan Program Imunisasi Wajib. Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 22(3).

Frastika, I., Rahayu, S. N. D., Agustin, T., & Kartika, L. (2020). Persepsi dan Sikap Orang Tua tentang Pemberian Imunisasi Anak. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Keperawatan Indonesia, 10(02).

Hasibuan, R., & Ginting, N. A. R. (2023). Hambatan terhadap Imunisasi Anak: Studi Kualitatif di Salah Satu Posyandu Kota Medan: Why Children are Not Brought in for Immunization: A Qualitative Investigation at Posyandu in Medan. Media Publikasi Promosi Kesehatan Indonesia (MPPKI), 6(12).

Hilala, P. (2025). Analisis Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 28 Tahun 2024 Tentang Peraturan Pelaksanaan Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2023 Tentang Kesehatan Terkait Pemberian Alat Kontrasepsi Bagi Siswa dan Remaja. GANEC SWARA, 19(1).

Juanda, A. (2018). Perlindungan Hukum Pelaksana Imunisasi Dalam Kejadian Ikutan Pasca Imunisasi Di Kabupaten Sukabumi. Aktualita (Jurnal Hukum), 1(1).

Lawrence O, G. (2019). Global Health Law. Havard University Press.

Manungkalit, E. M., Aningsih, B. S. D., Marici, A., Hidayah, A. N., & Tatebburuk, E. J. O. (2022). Peningkatan Peran Orangtua Terhadap Pemberian Imunisasi Sesuai Jadwal di Masa Pandemic Covid-19. JURNAL KREATIVITAS PENGABDIAN KEPADA MASYARAKAT (PKM), 5(2).

Miles, & Huberman. (2018). Qualitative Data Analysis. SAGE Publication.

Moleong. (2010). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mukhi, S., & Medise, B. E. (2021). Faktor yang Memengaruhi Penurunan Cakupan Imunisasi pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19 di Jakarta. Sari Pediatri, 22(6).

Noorsanti, I. A., & Yudhanti, R. (2023). Kemanfaatan Hukum Jeremy Bentham Relevansinya dengan Kebijakan Pemerintah melalui Bantuan Langsung Tunai Dana Desa. Sultan Jurisprudence: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, 3(2).

Ropii, I. (2024). Implementasi Telemedis di Indonesia: Analisis Hukum Perlindungan Hak Pasien dan Tenaga Medis. Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum, 5(2).

Salsabila, Z., & Syahrul, F. (2023). Faktor yang Berhubungan dengan Keikutsertaan Masyarakat dalam Vaksinasi Covid-19: Literature Review: Factors Related to Covid-19 Vaccination Uptake among Folks : Literature Review. Media Publikasi Promosi Kesehatan Indonesia (MPPKI), 6(1).

Santiago, F., & Asnawi, N. (2024). Pengantar Teori Hukum. Prenada Media.

Soerjono, S. (2007). Sosiologi Suatu Pengantar. Rajawali Press.

Sudrajat, T. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Tindakan Pemerintahan. Sinar Grafika.

Suko, W. (2020). The Sanctions Imposed For Violating The Rules Of Regional Head Election In Malang Regency Indonesia. Journal of Archaelogy of Egypy, 17(4).

Wahyuni, R. D., & Hadi, E. N. (2022). Persepsi Orang Tua Bayi terhadap Pemberian Imunisasi Dasar selama Pandemi Covid-19 di Jakarta dan Bekasi. Jurnal Kedokteran Dan Kesehatan, 18(1).

Wicaksono, D. E., & Kusumaningrum, A. E. (2023). Penerapan Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 12 Tahun 2017 Dalam Pemberian Vaksin. JISPENDIORA Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Pendidikan Dan Humaniora, 1(1).

Witri, R., & Putra, M. D. (2025). Immunization Rejection as a Parental Right and Children’s Right to Health in the Perspective of Health Law in Indonesia. Rechtsvinding, 3(1).

Downloads

Published

2025-11-29

How to Cite

Witri, R., Putra, M. D., Kuntardjo, C., & Ropii, I. (2025). Jambi City Government’s Strategy in Overcoming Parental Rejection of Diphtheria Tetanus Immunization at The Talang Bakung Health Center In Jambi City. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 6(1), 974–982. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2538