Theory of Justice’s Principles For A Just and Equitable Global Order
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2548Keywords:
Theory of justice; John Rawls; Fairness; Justice international lawAbstract
This article is part of a literature research in the field of international legal philosophy, which aims to discuss the application of John Rawls' thought in the context of international law. The presentation begins by describing the meaning of justice as a moral and ethical concept according to philosophers and John Rawls' position in it. The discussion is carried out on Rawls's ‘A Theory of Justice’, followed by ‘The Law of Peoples’ and its relation to international law. The essence of this article is to discuss justice (in Rawls' perspective) as a key principle in international law to create a just global order. The author explores Rawls' views on justice, peace, and governance. Rawls' theory of justice as fairness provides a valuable lens to analyse global issues. Rawls argues that just institutions should be based on principles that promote peace, stability, and the well-being of all nations. By adhering to these principles, international law can promote a more just and equitable global order.
References
Ackerly, Brooke A. (2018). Just Responsibility – A Human Right Theory of Global Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Amstutz, Mark (2013). International Ethics: Concepts, Theories, and Cases in Global Politics. Rowman and Littlefield.
Bergquist, William (2024). A Pathway to True Freedom. Harpswell, ME: Atlantic Sounding Press.
Brink, David, "Mill’s Moral and Political Philosophy", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2022 Edition), Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman (eds.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2022/entries/mill-moral-political/>.
Cawley, Patricia M (2012). Just War Theory: The Ethics of Revolution. Master Thesis. Washington State University.
Daniels, Norman (1989) (Ed). Reading Rawls – Critical Studies on Rawls’ A Theory of Justice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Davies, Ben (2019). “John Rawls and the ‘Veil of Ignorance.’” In Introduction to Ethics: An Open Educational Resource, p. 92–97. Golden West College, Huntington Beach, CA: NGE Far Press.
Etzioni, Amitai (2018). Law and Society in a Populist Age: Balancing Individual Rights and the Common Good. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
Follesdal, Andreas (2015). John Rawls’ Theory of Justice as Fairness. In: Fløistad, G. (eds) Philosophy of Justice. Contemporary Philosophy: A New Survey, vol 12. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9175-5_18 p. 311-328.
Förster, Annette (2012) Decent peace, stability and justice: John Rawls’s international theory applied. PhD thesis, London School of Economics and Political Science.
Friend, Celeste. Social Contract Theory. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://iep.utm.edu/soc-cont/#:~:text=In%20the%20twentieth%20century%2C%20moral,of%20social%20contract%20theory%2C%20and
Gordon, JS. (2024). Remarks on the Origins of Justice. In: Morality and Justice. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-65980-5_5
Harnsberger, Robert Scott (1981). Methodology and Justification in Rawls' Theory of Justice. Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin – Madison. https://philpapers.org/rec/HARMAJ-2
Hill, Ian (2023). “Russia’s invasion of Ukraine: Why and why now?”. Lowy Institute. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/russia-s-invasion-ukraine-why-why-now
Joseph, Thomas (2020). Ethics in Organization and Management: The Application of Contemporary Theories of Ethical Decision-Making in Global Conditions, in International Journal of Business Strategy and Automation (IJBSA) 1(3), p. 8.
Klabbers, Jan (2021). International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lempriere, Molly (2024). Dalam Carbonbrief, “Experts: What Does a Trump Presidency Mean for Climate Action?.” https://www.carbonbrief.org/experts-what-does-a-trump-presidency-mean-for-climate-action/
Leontsini, Eleni (2015). Justice and Moderation in the State: Aristotle and Beyond. In: Fløistad, G. (eds) Philosophy of Justice. Contemporary Philosophy: A New Survey, vol 12. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9175-5_3, p. 27-42.
McGrath, Matt (2020). “Climate change: US formally withdraws from Paris agreement.” BBC News, November 4th, 2020. https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-54797743
Fanton, Marcos (2020). “Rawls’s Point of View: A Systematic Reading of Justice as Fairness.” Bras. Political Sci. Rev. 14 (2). https://www.scielo.br/j/bpsr/a/x6QBwBZxYLFM6WGg6Trhrjy/#:~:text=In%20A%20Theory%20of%20Justice,was%20sufficiently%20robust%20to%20rival
Freeman, Samuel (2023), "Original Position", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2023 Edition), Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman (eds.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2023/entries/original-position/>.
Premchand, L., (2017) “Social Justice and Rawls’ Difference Principle”, Essex Student Journal 9(1). https://doi.org/10.5526/esj17
Rawls, J. (1958). Justice as fairness. Published in The Philosophical Review, Vol. 67, No. 2. (Apr., 1958), pp. 164-194 http://fs2.american.edu/dfagel/www/Philosophers/Rawls/JusticeAsFairness.pdf
Rawls, John (1982). The Basic Liberties and Their Priority. The Tanner Lecture’s on Human Value. University of Michigan.
Rawls, John (1993): “The Law of Peoples”. Critical Inquiry. 20. 1: 36-68
Rawls, John (1999): The Law of Peoples with “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited”. Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London: Harvard University Press.
Rawls, John (1999). A Theory of Justice. Revised Edition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Reidy, D. A. (2004). Rawls on International Justice: A Defense. Political Theory, 32(3), 291-319. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591703260928.
Richardson, Thomas (2020). “A Critique of John Rawls’s Theory of Justice”, in Richardson, T; Greaves, G; Davies, S; Edgley, I. The Close Review – Political Theory Edition. Cheltenham, Gloucestershire UK: DCS Library.
Rosen, A.D (1996). Kant’s Theory of Justice. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Samuel, Gregg. “Natural Law and The Law of Nations” in Natural Law, Natural Rights, and American Constitutionalism - Early Modern Liberal Roots of Natural Law. https://nlnrac.org/earlymodern/law-of-nations.html#_edn1
Scholl, J.A., Mederer, H.J., Scholl, R.W. (2022). “Leadership, Ethics, and Decision-Making”. In: Farazmand, A. (eds) Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66252-3_2407
Sim, Mao (2007). John Rawls on Justice as Fairness: A Critical Study. Dissertation. Assumption University. Bangkok.
Varden, Helga (2015). “Immanuel Kant – Justice as Freedom”. In: Fløistad, G. (eds) Philosophy of Justice. Contemporary Philosophy: A New Survey, vol 12. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9175-5_13, p. 213-237.
Voting Practices in the United Nations: Report to Congress Submitted Pursuant to Public Law 101-167. The US Department of States, 2003.
Vrdoljak, Ana Filipa, Liberty, Equality, Diversity: States, Cultures and International Law (December 3, 2012). Ana Filipa Vrdoljak. "Liberty, Equality, Diversity: States, Cultures and International Law" The Cultural Dimension of Human Rights Law. Ed. Ana Filipa Vrdoljak. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013, pp.26-70 , UTS: Law Research Paper No. 2014/11, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2273903
Wenar, Leif, "John Rawls", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2021 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/rawls/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Theofransus Litaay
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH).
