Constitutional Legitimacy, Limitations, and Strengthening of State-Owned Enterprise Monopoly Supervision in Economic Development and Protection of Healthy Business Competition in Indonesia

Authors

  • Budi Joyo Santoso Pancasila University
  • Adnan Hamid Universities Pancasila

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2554

Keywords:

BUMN, Monopoly, Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution, Supervision, KPPU

Abstract

This study highlights the central role of State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) in managing strategic sectors as a realization of the mandate of Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. This paper questions the legitimacy, constitutional limitations, and oversight mechanisms for monopoly rights granted by the President to SOEs, as well as the challenges of policy implementation in the context of national economic governance reform. The methodology used is a normative legal approach with conceptual analysis, legislation, and comparative studies with other countries. The study was conducted on key regulations such as Law No. 5 of 1999, Law No. 1 of 2025, and KPPU documents, supported by a review of Constitutional Court decisions. The analysis was conducted using legal hermeneutics and qualitative methods to interpret the constitutional limits and effectiveness of SOE monopoly supervision. The results of the discussion found that the constitutional legitimacy of SOE monopolies is indeed sourced from Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution, but their implementation must meet the requirements of efficiency, justice, and legal certainty. It was found that granting monopolies without periodic supervision and evaluation risks causing abuse of authority, market distortion, and discriminatory practices against other business actors. The KPPU's role as an independent supervisory body has proven strategic in preventing violations and correcting monopolistic policies inconsistent with the principles of fair competition. Strengthening oversight mechanisms, transparency of audit results, public involvement, and regular independent audits are needed as a foundation for adaptive and accountable governance. Recommendations for regulatory reform, effective KPPU involvement, and public participation are proposed to balance state interests and protection of business competition. The conclusion emphasizes that monopoly by state-owned enterprises is not an end in itself, but rather an instrument for realizing public welfare if implemented with transparency, strict oversight, and high accountability in accordance with the principles of constitutional economic democracy.

References

REFERENCE

Abizar Yusro, M., Rosa Sidabutar, L., Dezeana Ticoalu, L., Sandi Ariani, R., & et al. (2021). Parameters of Monopoly Rights of State-Owned Enterprises from the Perspective of Business Competition in Indonesia. Journal of Judicial Review , 23 (2), 217–230. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.37253/jjr.v

Adzkia, I., Gultom, E., Yuanitasari, D., & et al. (2025). Analysis of the Alleged Monopoly of the Payment System by Shopee in Indonesia, Including Its Impact on Business Competition, Law Enforcement, and Legal Implications in the Digital E-Commerce Ecosystem. JIHHP: Journal of Law, Humanities and Politics , 5 (5), 2025. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v5i5

Aprilly, CV, Fathimah, C., Istiqomah, D., Romadhoni, A., Oktavianada, R., & et al. (2025). The Impact of Avtur Monopoly on Business Competition: A Legal and Policy Study of the Case Study of PT X. CENDEKIA: Journal of Law, Social & Humanities , 3 (2), 2025. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15339489

Ash Shidiq, H., Zakaria, A., Nasution, H., & et al. (2024). Analysis of Sustainability Report Disclosure and Sustainability Performance in Energy, Oil, and Gas Cluster BUMN Companies. Journal of Business Innovation and Accounting Research , 1 (2), 162–178. https://doi.org/10.56442/s9q8z354

Disyon, H., & Sibarani, KB (2023). Justice as the Legal Goal of the State's Right to Control in the BUMN Holding Scheme. Pancasila: Jurnal Keindonesiaan , 3 (2), 134–148. https://doi.org/10.52738/pjk.v3i2.184

Filza Yunas, VA (2025). Competition Law Review of Direct Appointments in State-Owned Enterprise Synergy Based on PER-2/MBU/2023. Khatulistiwa: Journal of Education and Social Humanities , 5 (1), 851–874. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.55606/khatulistiwa.v5i1.6456 Available

Ginting, MM, Sirait, NN, & Windha. (2013). Exceptions to Monopolistic Practices Carried Out by State-Owned Enterprises in Accordance with Article 51 of Law No. 5 of 1999. TRANSPARENCY, Journal of Economic Law , II (2), 1–8.

Humairah, N. (2025). The Role of the Business Competition Supervisory Commission in Supervising Unfair Business Competition . Medan Area University, Medan.

Imantaka, B., Harswendo, SY, Jacous, JG, R. Yuniar, AI, & et al. (2023). State-Owned Enterprises' Immunity to Monopolies. Karimah Tauhid , 2 (3), 688–696. https://doi.org/10.30997/karimahtauhid.v2i3.8786

Kusumawardana, AS, & Apriani, R. (2025). Impact of Monopoly Practices in Business Space in Indonesia According to Indonesian Regulations. De'Rechtsstaat , 11 (1), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.30997/jhd.v11i1.7029

Larassati, A., Febri, A., Ramadhani, S., Kharazi, M.F., Rivai, A., & et al. (2024). The Effects of Monopoly Markets on the Indonesian Economy: Benefit or Disadvantage? JoSES: Journal of Sharia Economics Scholar , 2 (3), 26–35. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14223839 Effects

Muhammad, F., Fadhilah, HN, Hidayat, MI, & et al. (2025). Economic Justice in Islamic Business Law. MRBEST; Media for Research on Science and Applied Economic Business , 3 (2), 95–102. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.71312/mrbest.v3i2.315

Ningtias, DP, Mahisi, PL, Sabila, S., & Diponegoro, HU (2025). Progressiveness of Anti-Predatory Pricing Policy through Parallel Investigation Based on Human Centered Design to Protect E-Commerce Business Actors. Forschungs Forum Law Journal , 2 (2), 170–191.

Patul, D., Kornelis, Y., Zukriadi, D., & et al. (2024). Strengthening the Check and Balance Mechanism to Prevent Corruption in State-Owned Enterprises: A Constitutional Law Perspective. Causa , 5 (4), 1–6. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.3783/causa.v2i9.2461

Guidelines for the Implementation of the Provisions of Article 51, Pub. L. No. Article 51, Republic of Indonesia Business Competition Supervisory Commission (2009).

Permadani, RM (2024). Legal Analysis of Price Fixing Agreements in the Practice of Airline Ticket Price Cartels by Several Airlines in Indonesia (Study of the Decision of the Business Competition Supervisory Commission Number 15/KPPU-I/2019). Al-Hikmah Journal of Law and Society , 5 (1), 30–36.

Primayoga, E., & Aulisa, Y. (2022). Trends in Prosecution of Corruption Cases in State-Owned Enterprises .

Putu, S. (2019). The Perspective of Business Competition Law on the Demonopolization Policy of State-Owned Enterprises in Indonesia. Simbur Cahaya , 25 (1), 1–15.

Rasji, & Darmansyah, E. (2025). LEGAL ANALYSIS OF THE EXPANSION OF MONOPOLY RIGHTS TO STATE-OWNED ENTERPRISES BY THE PRESIDENT: A STUDY BASED ON THE PERSPECTIVE OF LEGAL PHILOSOPHY. Rewang Rencang: Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis , 5 (10), 1–15.

Samawati, P. (2018). State-Owned Enterprise Monopoly from the Perspective of Business Competition Law. In MI Bisri (Ed.), Business Competition Supervisory Commission (1st ed.). Tunggal Mandiri.

Suparji, & Ikraam, A. (2015). The Case of Cross-Share Ownership of PT Temasek Holdings. Journal of Master of Law , 1 (2).

Yanto, A., Hikmah, F., Nugroho, S., Firmansyah, D., & et al. (2023). Review of Governance and Monopolistic Practices of State-Owned Enterprises from a Competition Law Perspective. Legal Reform , 27 (3), 226–235. https://doi.org/10.46257/jrh.v27i3.686

Downloads

Published

2025-11-05

How to Cite

Budi Joyo Santoso, & Hamid, A. (2025). Constitutional Legitimacy, Limitations, and Strengthening of State-Owned Enterprise Monopoly Supervision in Economic Development and Protection of Healthy Business Competition in Indonesia. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 6(1), 587–599. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2554