Asset Recovery as an Effort to Restore State Losses Resulting from Corruption Cases

Authors

  • Irda Nur Khumaeroh Universitas Kartamulia
  • M. Rizal Bagaskoro Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2564

Keywords:

Asset Recovery, State Losses, Corruption

Abstract

Eradicating corruption solely by prosecuting and imposing imprisonment on perpetrators does not fully resolve the problem if the assets obtained from corrupt practices cannot be recovered by the state for development purposes. Therefore, the recovery of assets resulting from corruption becomes a crucial aspect of combating corruption. This study uses a normative legal research method, which emphasizes document studies or literature research. The substance of the asset recovery legal system through criminal law consists of four stages: asset tracing, asset freezing or confiscation, asset seizure, and the return and transfer of assets to the victim state. Efforts to recover state losses caused by corruption cases through asset recovery include seizing and tracing the assets of defendants or convicts, ensuring that convicts pay compensation, encouraging public support for anti-corruption initiatives, improving facilities and infrastructure for corruption eradication, and clearly regulating—based on applicable laws—the authority of KPK prosecutors and public prosecutors appointed and dismissed by the Corruption Eradication Commission.

References

Ade Mahmud, 2018, “Problematika Asset Recovery dalam Pengembalian Kerugian Negara Akibat Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Yudisial”, Vol. 11 No. 3.

Artidjo Alkostar, 2008, Kerugian Keuangan Negara dalam Perspektif Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Varia Peradilan No. 275.

Bahder Johan Nasution, 2008, Metode Penelitian Ilmu Hukum, Mandar Maju, Bandung.

Darmadi Djufri, dkk, 2020, “Model Pengembalian Aset (Asset Recovery) Sebagai Alternatif Memulihkan Kerugian Negara Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi”, Disiplin: Majalah Civitas Akademika Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum sumpah Pemuda, Vol. 26 No. 2.

Gomgom TP Siregar, 2023, “Pengembalian Aset (Asset Recovery) Pelaku Tinkda Pidana Korupsi”, Unes Law Review, Vol. 6 No. 2.

I Gusti Ketut Ariawan, 2008, “Stolen Aset Recovery Initative, Suatu Harapan dalam Pengembalian Aset Negara”, Jurnal Kertha Patrika, Vol. 33 No. 1.

Kusnadi, 2020, “ Kebijakan Formulasi Ketentuan Pengembalian Aset Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi”, Jurnal Corruptio, Vol. 1 No. 2.

Lutfiatul Hasanah, 2020, “Upaya Pengembalian Aset Negara: Wujud Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi”, Jurnal Anti Korupsi, Vol. 3 Issue 2.

Refi Meidiantama dan Cholfia Aldamia, 2022, “Pengembalian Aset Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Hukum Internasional Dan Implementasinya Pada Hukum Nasional Indonesia”, Muhammadiyah Law Review, Vol. 6 No. 1.

Sandi Herintus Kabba, dkk, 2021, “Prosedur Pengembalian Dan Pemulihan Kerugian Negara Akibat Tindak Pidana Korupsi”, Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, Vol. 2 No. 3.

Sylvana Agnetha Wulan Widyastuty, dkk, 2022, “Pengembalian Aset Tindak Pidana Korupsi Berdasarkan United Nation Convention Against Corruption Di Kawasan ASEAN”, Jurnal Legal Spirit, Vol. 6 No. 2.

Ulang Mangun Sosiawan, 2020, “Penanganan Pengembalian Aset Negara Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi dan Penerapan Konvensi PBB Anti Korupsi di Indonesia”, Jurnal Penelitian Hukum: De Jure, Vol. 20 No. 4.

Zaenudin et al., 2018, “Norm of Recovery of State Financial Loss because of Criminal Law of Corruption in Indonesia,” Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization 71.

Amiruddin dan Zainal Asikin, 2010, Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta.

H. P. Panggabean, 2020, Pemulihan Aset Tindak Pidana Korupsi: Teori - Praktik dan Yurisprudensi di Indonesia, Bhuana Ilmu Populer, Jakarta.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, 2016, Penelitian Hukum, Edisi Revisi, Cetakan ke 12, Prenadamedia Group, Jakarta.

Robert Kennedy, 2017, Pengembalian Aset Hasil Kejahatan dalam Perspektif Rezim Anti Pencucian Uang, Rajawali Press, Jakarta.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-10

How to Cite

Khumaeroh, I. N., & Bagaskoro, M. R. (2025). Asset Recovery as an Effort to Restore State Losses Resulting from Corruption Cases. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 6(1), 650–657. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2564