The Liability of Cosmetics Business Operators For The Impact of Hazardous Product: Pinkflash Cosmetics Brand on Consumers

Authors

  • Mayla Putri Farbadi Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta
  • Suherman Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2621

Keywords:

Consumer Protection Act, Legal Liability, Indonesian Cosmetics Law

Abstract

Consumer protection in the cosmetics industry is a very important aspect in realizing justice, safety, and legal certainty, especially when dangerous products can threaten public health. This article aims to analyze the legal responsibilities of cosmetics businesses and the legal protection provided to consumers in the case of Pinkflash products containing dangerous ingredients such as mercury and hydroquinone. The research method used is normative legal research with a legislative, conceptual, and case approach. The results show that cosmetic businesses bear civil, criminal, and administrative legal responsibility, including the obligation to compensate consumers, criminal sanctions in the form of imprisonment and fines, and administrative sanctions in the form of product recalls and revocation of distribution permits by the Indonesian Food and Drug Administration (BPOM). Legal protection for consumers is carried out preventively through product supervision and distribution permits, as well as repressively through the application of the principle of strict liability, legal sanctions, and dispute resolution through the Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency (BPSK). Although the legal framework in Indonesia is comprehensive, its implementation is still weak due to a lack of post-distribution supervision and low consumer awareness. Therefore, improved coordination between institutions and public education are needed to achieve effective consumer protection.

References

Apriliani, R. (2024). Ini Klarifikasi Pinkflash Usai 3 Produknya Dinyatakan Berbahaya oleh BPOM RI. Beautynesia. https://www.beautynesia.id/beauty/ini-klarifikasi-pinkflash-usai-3-produknya-dinyatakan-berbahaya-oleh-bpom-ri/b-298219

Azhara, & Khasanah, N. (2021). Waspada Bahaya Kosmetik: Tuntunan Cerdas Mengenal Dampak-Dampak Negatif Penggunaan Zat Kimia Berbahaya dalam Kosmetik Anda. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

Erlinawati, M., & Nugrahaningsih, W. (2017). Implementasi Undang-undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen terhadap Bisnis Online. 11(1), 27-40. https://www.neliti.com/publications/163571/implementasi-undang-undang-nomor-8-tahun-1999-tentang-perlindungan-konsumen-terh#cite

Fil’ Awalin, H. (2025). Consumer Legal Protection for Overclaimed Skincare Products. Delega Lata: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 10(1), 32-39. https://doi.org/10.30596/dll.v10i1.22493

Gautama, W. R. (2024). 3 Produk Pinkflash yang Ditarik BPOM karena Mengandung Bahan Berbahaya. Suara.com. https://www.suara.com/lifestyle/2024/12/03/081000/3-produk-pinkflash-yang-ditarik-bpom-karena-mengandung-bahan-berbahaya

Indonesian Civil Code (Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata)

Karolina, G. A., Priyanto, M. D., & Sumadi, P. S. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen Pengguna Kosmetik Berbahaya. Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum, 9(12), 2352-2365. doi:https://doi.org/10.24843/KS.2021.v09.i12.p08.

Kusumadewi, Y., & Sharon, G. (2022). Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Yogyakarta: Lembaga Fatimah Azzahrah. https://repository.unkris.ac.id/id/eprint/2234/1/9786239796983.pdf

Lestari, E. (2015). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Bagi Pelaku Usaha yang Menjual Kosmetik Pemutih Wajah yang Mengandung Bahan Kimia Berbahaya (Studi di Bbpom Surabaya). Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya. https://www.neliti.com/publications/35378/pertanggungjawaban-pidana-bagi-pelaku-usaha-yang-menjual-kosmetik-pemutih-wajah#cite

Law Number 8 of 1999 on Consumer Rights

Law Number 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions

Law Number 17 of 2023 on Health

Magfirah, & Dwi, E. (2009). Perlindungan Konsumen Dalam E-Commerce. Jakarta: Grafikatama Jaya.

Panjaitan, H. (2021). Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Jala Permata Aksara.

Perlindungan Hukum bagi Konsumen Terkait Klaim Berlebihan (overclaim) Pelaku Usaha Skincare pada Media Sosial Tiktok HUkum Bagi Konsumen Terkait Klaim Berlebihan (Overclaim) Pelaku Usaha Skincare pada Media Sosial Tiktok. (2025). E-Journal Fatwa Hukum FACULTY OF LAW, 8(3). https://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/jfh/article/view/99087.

Regulation of the National Agency of Drug and Food Control (BPOM) No. 23 of 2019 concerning Technical Requirements for Cosmetic Ingredients

Regulation of the National Agency of Drug and Food Control (BPOM) No. 12 of 2020 concerning the Procedure for Supervising Cosmetics Distributed Online

Regulation of the National Agency of Drug and Food Control (BPOM) No. 12 of 2023 concerning the Supervision of the Manufacture and Circulation of Cosmetics

Rihi, M. G., Hedewata, A., & Pello, H. F. (2024). Alasan Konsumen Tidak Mengadukan Kasusnya serta Bentuk Perlindungan Konsumen Akibat Kosmetik yang Berbahaya Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan Dan Sosial Humaniora, 1(6), 117–135. https://doi.org/10.62383/aliansi.v1i6.557

Sari, S. A., Djumadi, D., & Zakiyah, Z. (2023). Tanggung Gugat Atas Produk Kosmetik Yang Ditarik Bpom Karena Mengandung Zat Berbahaya. Lex Positivis, 1(3). https://jtamfh.ulm.ac.id/index.php/jtamfh/article/view/56

Sembiring, S., & Pratama, B. P. (2022). Perlindungan Terhadap Konsumen Kosmetik Ilegal Yang Mengandung Zat Berbahaya. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekotrans & Erudisi, 2(1), 83-87. https://doi.org/10.69989/rxjpk348

Shidarta. (2006). Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen Indonesia. Jakarta: Grasindo.

Siaran Pers. (2023, March 16). Siaran Pers | Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan. Retrieved October 23, 2025, from https://www.pom.go.id/siaran-pers/bpom-tindak-pabrik-kosmetika-ilegal-yang-diduga-mengandung-bahan-dilarang

Siaran Pers. (2024). Siaran Pers | Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan. https://www.pom.go.id/siaran-pers/kepala-bpom-taruna-ikrar-rilis-daftar-kosmetik-yang-dinyatakan-mengandung-bahan-dilarang-atau-berbahaya-di-peredaran-termasuk-di-media-online-periode-november-2023-s-d-oktober-2024

Sinduningrum, A., & Marlyna, H. (2023). Penerapan Strict Liability dalam Hukum Pelindungan Konsumen di Indonesia: Perbandingan Negara Lain. UNES Law Review, 6(2), 5021-5030. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1321

Utomo, Y. D., & Baidhowi, B. (n.d.). Perlindungan Hukum Konsumen Terhadap Peredaran Kosmetik Berbahaya yang Ditarik di Provinsi Jawa Tengah. Ikatan Penulis Mahasiswa Hukum Indonesia Law Journal, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.15294/ipmhi.v5i1.28961

Winata, M. G. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Korban Pengguna Produk Kosmetik Ilegal Berbahaya. SAPIENTIA ET VIRTUS, 7(1), 34-43. https://doi.org/10.37477/sev.v7i1.343

Zulham. (2017). Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Jakarta: Prenada Media.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-11

How to Cite

Farbadi, M. P., & Suherman. (2025). The Liability of Cosmetics Business Operators For The Impact of Hazardous Product: Pinkflash Cosmetics Brand on Consumers. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 6(1), 676–684. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2621