The Reconstruction of Free Judgments in Corruption Crimes and Its Implications for Enforcement Laws in Indonesia

Authors

  • Adam Sofyan Ashal Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Tarumanagara, Indonesia
  • Amad Sudiro Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Tarumanagara, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2678

Keywords:

reconstruction,, acquittals,, corruption,, law enforcement

Abstract

Acquittals in corruption cases often generate controversy and undermine public trust, necessitating their reconstruction to strengthen justice and law enforcement in Indonesia and mitigate errors in the application of law (error in recht) in acquittal decisions. The problem at hand is how to reconstruct acquittals in corruption cases under the Corruption Eradication Law and the implications of acquittals for law enforcement in Indonesia. The research method used is normative juridical legal research. The results indicate that the reconstruction of acquittals in corruption cases is necessary to affirm justice and legal certainty. This effort requires limiting judicial interpretation, strengthening evidence, and tightening oversight to maintain judicial integrity and increase public trust. The reconstruction of acquittals strengthens accountability, transparency, and consistency in the judiciary, while ensuring substantive justice. This reform also increases public trust and strengthens commitment to corruption eradication and the rule of law.

References

Afrizal, T. Y. (2024). The Criminal Acts of Corruption as Extraordinary Crimes in Indonesia. International Journal of Law, Social Science, and Humanities, 1(1), 27-37. https://doi.org/10.70193/ijlsh.v1i1.141

Adhi, S., Arifin, R., & Sani, T. (2025). From Administrative Irregularities to Criminal Acts: Uncovering Corruption in State Procurement Systems. PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law, 6(2), 137-167. https://doi.org/10.22437/pampas.v6i2.43759

Arabella, R. N. A. (2025). Membangun Zona Integritas: Analisis Implementasi Reformasi Birokrasi dalam Meningkatkan Integritas Aparat Penegak Hukum di Indonesia (Studi Literarur Sistematis 2015-2025). Jurnal Penelitian Ilmiah Multidisipliner, 2(03).

Arief, B. N. (2016). Bunga rampai kebijakan hukum pidana. Prenada Media.

Asshiddiqie, J. (2022). Peradilan Etik dan Etika Konstitusi: Perspektif Baru tentang Rule of Law and Rule of Ethics & Constitutional Law and Constitutional Ethics (Edisi Revisi). Sinar Grafika.

Atmasasmita, R. (2004). Sekitar Masalah Korupsi: Aspek nasional dan aspek internasional. Mandar maju.

Bahar, M. G. F., Firdaus, S. P., & Fairuza, H. H. (2024). Paradigm of Recodification of Corruption in Criminal Code Against its Designation as Extraordinary Crime. Arena Hukum, 17(3), 694-713. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum2024.01703.10

Behuku, J. G., Kusuma, J. I., Chasanah, N. U., Sugianto, F., & Indradewi, A. A. (2025). The Judge’s Role in the Effectiveness of Anti-Corruption Enforcement in Indonesia: A Juridical Analysis. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 7(1), 351-367. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v7i1.464

Firmansyah, F., Santoso, T., Febrian, F., & Nashriana, N. (2020). Reconstruction to prove elements of detrimental to state finances in the criminal act of corruption in Indonesia. Jurnal Cita Hukum, 8(3), 671-692. https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v8i3.18295

Gunarto, G., & Wahyuningsih, S. E. (2022). Legal Reconstruction of Corruption Act in Indonesia to Realize a Just Law Enforcement. Scholars International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 5(10), 416-421. https://doi.org/10.36348/sijlcj.2022.v05i10.003

Hamzah, A. (2010). Hukum acara pidana Indonesia.

Harahap, Y. M. (2017). Pembahasan Permasalahan Dan Penerapan KUHAP Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, dan Peninjauan Kembali. Jakarta. Sinar Grafika.

Mansyur, M., Renggong, R., & Oner, B. (2024). Putusan Bebas Perkara Pidana Korupsi Di Pengadilan Pidana Korupsi Makassar. Indonesian Journal of Legality of Law, 6(2), 297-301.

Nurohman, H., & Kusriyah, S. (2022). Reconstruction of Liability for Corruption Involving Corporations Based on the Justice Value. Scholars International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 5(10). https://doi.org/10.36348/sijlcj.2022.v05i10.005

Pane, M. D., & Pudjiastuti, D. (2020). The Legal Aspect of New Normal and the Corruption Eradication in Indonesia. Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law), 7(2), 6. https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v7n2.a3

Permatasari, A., Sirrinawati, S., Gulo, S., Sulaeman, A., & Wiradirja, I. R. (2024). Distortion of Gratuities In Acquittal (Vrijspraak) Verdict in Corruption Case Juridical Analysis of the Central Jakarta District Court Decision Number: 37/Pid. Sus-Tpk/2021/PN. Jkt. Pst. Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences, 2(4), 354-370. https://doi.org/10.38035/gijlss.v2i4.325

Saputra, Y. E., & Salmah, H. K. (2024). Comparative Analysis of Laws: Provisions and Sanctions For Corruption Crimes in Indonesia and Japan. Widya Gama Law Review, 1(2), 1-13.

Saragih, Y. M. (2017). Problematika Gratifikasi Dalam Sistem Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Analisis Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 Jo Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Hukum Responsif, 5(5), 76-86.

Suadi, A. (2021). Law Enforcement against Corruption in the Criminal Justice System in Indonesia. Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology, 25(6), 4586-4591.

Taekema, S. (2018). Theoretical and normative frameworks for legal research: Putting theory into practice. Law and Method, 2018(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.5553/rem/.000031

Taufan, R. A., Ariany, E., & Saptomo, A. (2025). Comparative Evaluation of Regulation and Law Enforcement of Corruption Crimes in Indonesia and Malaysia. Sociological Jurisprudence Journal. Volume 8, Issue 1, Page 90-97. https://doi.org/10.22225/ scj.8.1.2025.90-97

Downloads

Published

2025-11-21

How to Cite

Ashal, A. S., & Sudiro, A. (2025). The Reconstruction of Free Judgments in Corruption Crimes and Its Implications for Enforcement Laws in Indonesia . Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 6(1), 885–896. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2678