Niet Ontvankelijke Verklaard (Di NO) Case of Annulment of Marriage Due to an Arranged Marriage
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i2.2695Keywords:
Niet Ontvankelijke Verklaard, Marriage Annulment, Arranged Marriage, Consent, Normative JurisprudenceAbstract
This study aims to analyze the decision of Niet Ontvankelijke Verklaard (NO) or the inadmissibility of the case in the case of marriage annulment based on an arranged marriage agreed by the parties, as well as to examine the legal basis, the judge's considerations, and the legal implications for the protection of the rights of the parties harmed in the marriage. The phenomenon of arranged marriages still often occurs in society for reasons of custom, economics, or family honor. However, when the marriage is filed for annulment to the religious court, it is not uncommon for the application to be declared Niet Ontvankelijke Verklaard because it is considered not to meet the formal and material requirements according to the provisions of civil procedural law and Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage and the Compilation of Islamic Law. This study uses a normative juridical method with a case approach and a statute approach, through an analysis of court decisions that declare the case inadmissible. The results of the study indicate that the main reasons for the judge to issue an NO decision are the failure to fulfill the legal standing requirements, the incompleteness of the object of the lawsuit, and formal defects in the petition for annulment. Furthermore, the agreement to an arranged marriage by the parties to the marriage is considered voluntary, thus failing to meet the element of coercion that constitutes the basis for annulment. The NO ruling has the legal implication that the case was not examined to its core, allowing the parties to resubmit the lawsuit with formal amendments. In conclusion, the Niet Ontvankelijke Verklaard ruling in the case of annulment of a marriage based on an arranged marriage does not mean the marriage is fully valid, but rather indicates an inaccuracy in the lawsuit filing procedure that must be improved to achieve legal certainty and protect individual rights in marriage.
References
Bahrum, M., Agama, P., Rappang, S., & Selatan, S. (2018). Muhktaruddin Bahrum Problematika Isbat Nikah … PROBLEMATIKA ISBAT NIKAH POLIGAMI SIRRI. http://jurnal.iain-bone.ac.id/index.php/aladalah
Bernhard I. M. Supit. (2015). Pembatalan Nikah Menurut Hukum Kanonik Dalam Hubungannya Dengan Sistem Perundang – Undangan Di Indonesia. Lex Privatum, 2(1), 199–210. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/7021
Darwis, R. (2020). Penentuan Unsur Paksaan Dan Ancaman Sebagai Dasar Pembatalan Perkawinan Di Pengadilan Agama Masamba. MADDIKA : Journal of Islamic Family Law, 1(1), 48–59. https://doi.org/10.24256/maddika.v1i1.1560
Efrilius Kantriburi, Ketut Sudiatmaka, & Komang Febrinayanti Dantes. (2022). Akibat Hukum Terhadap Pembatalan Pernikahan (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Ri Nomor 1644 K/Pdt/2020). Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia, 5(3), 284–296. https://doi.org/10.23887/jatayu.v5i3.51906
Ega Putra Dani, A., & Murry Darmoko. (2023). Ketentuan Perkawinan Sesama Jenis Di Indonesia Dan Belanda. Jurnal Hukum Dan Keadilan, 12, 121–137. https://doi.org/10.56943/judiciary.v12i1.150
Hardhani, V. M., Mulyadi, & Yunanto. (2016). Akibat Hukum Pembatalan Perkawinan Karena Pemalsuan Identitas ( Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor : 615/Pdt.G/2014/Pa.Smg ). Diponegoro Law Review, 5(3), 1–17. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/dlr/article/view/12054
Labetubun, M. A. H., & Fataruba, S. (2020). Implikasi Hukum Putusan Pengadilan terhadap Pembatalan Perkawinan. Batulis Civil Law Review, 1(1), 54. https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v1i1.430, No Thttps://doi.org/10.15642/mal.v2i6.109itle. (n.d.).
Novitta, F. D. (2022). Tinjauan Yuridis Tentang Pembatalan Perkawinan Karena Penipuan Pihak Laki-Laki. Jurnal Justice, 4(1), 67–75.
Pramudita, L. (2011). Jurusan Al-Akhwal Al-Syakhsiyah Iain Syekh Nurjati Cirebon 2011 M / 1432 H. 3512.
Salamon, D. A. F. (2020). Pembatalan Pernikahan Sebab Poligami Berdasarkan Perspektif Imam Syaf’i (Tinjauan Putusan No: 1050/Pdt.G/2018/PA.Mlg).
View of Analisis Hukum Islam terhadap Sanksi Pembatalan Khithbah Nikah.pdf. (n.d.).
View of BASIC ANALYSIS DEMANDING REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS IN A LAWSUIT FOR CANCELLATION OF THE PREPARATION OF THE MARRIAGE CEREMONY IN DECISION NUMBER_ 82_Pdt.G_2014_PN. MKS.pdf. (n.d.).
View of Pembatalan Pernikahan (Fasakh Nikah) Dalam Berbagai Legislasi.pdf. (n.d.).
View of The Impact of Unilateral Cancellation After Marriage Agreement (Case Study of Mubarakah Marriage at Hidayatullah Islamic Boarding School Balikpapan 2020).pdf. (n.d.).
View of Unacceptable Lawsuit (Niet Ontvankelijke Verklaard) in a Divorce Lawsuit Filed at the Badung Religious Court.pdf. (n.d.).
Wali, A., Yang, N., & Sah, T. (2024). Ilmu Hukum_30301700269_fullpdf.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Anggun Purnama Sari, Deni Setiyawan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH).
