Legal Vacuum in Inheritance Dispute Resolution: A Comparative Study of Customary Law and Positive Law in Bonokeling

Authors

  • Zaenudin Universitas Jenderal Soedirman
  • Ajeng Aditya Listyani Universitas Jenderal Soedirman
  • Wasis Singgih Sasono Universitas Jenderal Soedirman
  • Nanda Rahayu Haryadi Universitas Jenderal Soedirman
  • Pritha Arintha Natasaputri Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i2.3035

Keywords:

Bonokeling, Customary Law, Inheritance, Legal Vacuum, Legal Pluralism

Abstract

This study examines the legal vacuum in resolving inheritance disputes in the Bonokeling indigenous community in Pekuncen Village, Jatilawang District, Banyumas Regency, Central Java, by examining the tension between customary law norms and the national legal system. Although the customary inheritance norms of the Bonokeling indigenous community, based on family deliberation, are still alive and well, the resulting agreements often lack legal force in the state's judicial system. This study employed a normative and empirical juridical approach (socio-legal research). Data were obtained through literature review, interviews, and observations within the Bonokeling indigenous community. The findings indicate that the legal vacuum is institutional and regulatory, rather than normative, because customary norms persist but have not received adequate formal recognition. The absence of a legal mechanism to validate the results of family deliberations creates the potential for legal conflict when disputes are brought to court. Therefore, this study recommends the need for a legal strengthening scheme for customary decisions, for example through the creation of a peace deed or legal recognition of customary deliberation mechanisms. The implications of this research emphasize the importance of integrating legal pluralism into the national legal system to ensure substantive justice and legal certainty for indigenous peoples.

References

Achmad Hariri, & Basuki Babussalam. (2024). Legal Pluralism: Concept, Theoretical Dialectics, and Its Existence in Indonesia. Walisongo Law Review (Walrev), 6(2), 146–170. https://doi.org/10.21580/walrev.2024.6.2.25566

Adi Surya, F. (2023). Pluralisme Hukum Dalam Perspektif Pancasila Tantangan Dalam Era Globalisasi. Indonesian Journal of Legality of Law, 6(1), 207–212. https://doi.org/10.35965/ijlf.v6i1.3931

Apryano, A. A., Ramadhan, A., Fernando, F. F., & Erdiyanto, R. P. (2024). Penyelesaian Sengketa Waris Dalam Konflik Antar Keluarga Sedarah. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 8(1), 961–968. https://doi.org/10.31316/jk.v8i1.6441

Conny R., S. (2010). Metode Penelltlan Kualltatlf: Jenis, Karakteristik, dan Keunggulannya. PT Grasindo

Dilova, G., Syukron, M., Siregar, S. A., & Hasanah, A. N. (2022). The role of Minangkabau Women in Family and Community in Gender Fair Development. JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum), 8(1), 60-70. https://doi.org/10.3376/jch.v8i1.569

Faradila, A. N., & Dewi, W. S. (2023). Implementasi Asas Musyawarah dan Mufakat dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Hukum Waris Adat di Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(2), 39–46. https://doi.org/Https://10.31943/Afkarjournal.V6i3.749

Praditha, D. G. E., (2023). Suatu Pengantar Hukum Adat. Literasi Nusantara

Harahap, A. P., Ramadhona, A., Sari, M., & Hasibuan, N. L. (2025). Legal Pluralism and Customary Justice in Indonesia: Reconstructing Adat Law under State Legal Dominance. Littera Legis: Journal of Law, Society, and Justice, 1(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14442213.2019.1670241

Wijaya, E. L. F. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Konsumen Atas Kesamaan Bunyi Merek Terhadap Barang Yang Tidak Sejenis. JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum), 5(2), 185-197. http://doi.org/10.33760/jch.v5i2.187

Nisa, R. (2025). Digital Literacy in Islamic Elementary Schools: an Overview of The Factors, Challenges, and Impact 21st Century Skills Development. Jurnal Cendekia Media Komunikasi Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Pendidikan Islam, 17(01), 334-355. https://doi.org/10.37850/cendekia.v17i01.1025

Abubakar, H. R. I. (2021). Pengantar Metodologi Penelitian. SUKA-Press UIN Sunan Kalijaga

Nury, M. (2023). Peran Kyai Sebagai Mediator dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Waris di Madura. Adhki: Journal of Islamic Family Law, 4(1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.37876/adhki.v4i1.92

Simarmata, R. (2021). Kedudukan dan Peran Peradilan Adat Pasca-Unifikasi Sistem Peradilan Formal. Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 4(2), 281–308. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.4.2.281-308

Terok, K. I., Munawir, Z., & Lubis, A. A. (2021). Pengaruh Mediasi dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Waris. JUNCTO: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 3(1), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.31289/juncto.v3i1.471

Van Dijk, R. (1964). Pengantar Hukum Adat Indonesia, Terjemahan Soehardi. In Alumni, Bandung

Zulkarnain, H., & SH, M. (2021). Hukum Komtetensi Peradilan Agama: Pergeseran Kompetensi Peradilan Agama dalam Hukum Positif di Indonesia. Prenada Media

Downloads

Published

2026-02-10

How to Cite

Zaenudin, Z., Listyani, A. A., Sasono, W. S., Haryadi, N. R., & Natasaputri, P. A. (2026). Legal Vacuum in Inheritance Dispute Resolution: A Comparative Study of Customary Law and Positive Law in Bonokeling. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 6(2), 1209–1216. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i2.3035