Application of Essential Facilities Doctrine to Data and Algorithm Access As An Enforcement Instrument for Article 25 of Law No. 5 Of 1999 in The Digital Economy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i2.3059Keywords:
Essential Facilities Doctrine, Abuse of Dominance, Data Access, Algorithms, Digital Economy, Article 25 of Law No. 5/1999Abstract
Dominant digital platforms in Indonesia control strategic assets in the form of massive user data and search/recommendation algorithms that serve as market access gateways. Exclusive control over these assets creates barriers to entry and forecloses competitors in the digital ecosystem. The Essential Facilities Doctrine (EFD), traditionally applied to physical infrastructure such as ports and telecommunications networks, offers a legal framework for identifying when control over digital assets can be qualified as abuse of dominance requiring access sharing with competitors. This article doctrinally examines whether and how EFD can be applied to non-personal data and algorithms under Article 25 of Law No. 5 of 1999, and explores synchronization with Law No. 27 of 2022 on Personal Data Protection, particularly regarding data portability. The research employs a library-based approach with doctrinal-normative analysis of Law No. 5/1999 and the Data Protection Law, conceptual analysis to develop criteria for "digital essential facilities," and comparative doctrinal analysis of EFD application in the European Union and United States. Findings demonstrate that data and algorithms can be qualified as essential facilities if they cumulatively meet four criteria: (1) controlled by a dominant undertaking; (2) cannot be economically and technically duplicated; (3) access is essential for competing in downstream markets; and (4) no objective justification exists for refusing access. The article recommends that KPPU develop specific guidelines on data and algorithm access, considering efficiency defense, intellectual property rights, and privacy protection. The proposed framework balances competition enforcement with innovation incentives and clarifies when data-sharing obligations arise under Indonesian competition law without requiring legislative amendment.
References
Abrahamson, Z. (2015). Essential Data. Yale Law Journal, 124(7). Retrieved from https://yalelawjournal.org/comment/essential-data
Ahlborn, C., Lukey, B., María, &, & Martí, M. (2024). ECJ’s Google Shopping Judgment: The End of a Long Saga. Retrieved from https://www.covcompetition.com/2024/09/ecjs-google-shopping-judgment-the-end-of-a-long-saga/
ANTARA NEws. (2022). KPPU putuskan merger Gojek-Tokopedia tidak langgar persaingan usaha. Retrieved from https://www.antaranews.com/berita/2788973/kppu-putuskan-merger-gojek-tokopedia-tidak-langgar-persaingan-usaha
Case C-7/97. (1998). Oscar Bronner GmbH & Co. KG v. Mediaprint, ECR I-7791 (Vol. 11).
Competition and Markets Authority (CMA). (2019, July 3). Online platforms and digital advertising market study. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5fe495
Crémer, J., de Montjoye, Y.-A., & Schweitzer, H. (2019). Competition policy for the digital era (6).
De Streel, A., Feasey, R., Krämer, J., & Monti, M. (2021, May 7). Data portability, interoperability and digital platform competition. OECD Digital Economy Papers No. 316. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). https://doi.org/10.1787/0f79ce1d-en
DLA Piper. (2024). Data protection laws in Indonesia. Retrieved 02/10/2026 from https://www.dlapiperdataprotection.com/?t=law&c=ID
European Commission. (2022). About the Digital Markets Act. Retrieved from https://digital-markets-act.ec.europa.eu/about-dma_en
European Data Protection Board (EDPB). (2025). Position paper on Interplay between data protection and competition law. Brussels, Belgium.
Frischmann, B., & Waller, S. W. (2008). Revitalizing Essential Facilities. Antitrust Law Journal, 75(1), 1–65. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/27897568
Gikay, A. A. (2025). Trade secrecy in automated decisions: against the myth of irreconcilability and the imposition of patents. Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, 20(8), 552–561. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpaf038
Gore, D., & van Rooijen, A. (2021). Ex Post Assessment of European Competition Policy: The Microsoft Cases. Draft Report for the 2021 Annual Conference of the GCLC. Bruges, Belgium: Global Competition Law Centre (GCLC), College of Europe. Retrieved from https://www.coleurope.eu/sites/default/files/uploads/page/gclc_report_draft_-_the_microsoft_cases.pdf
GoTo Company. (2021, May 17). Gojek and Tokopedia combine to form GoTo, the largest technology group in Indonesia and the “go to” ecosystem for daily. Retrieved from https://www.gotocompany.com/en/news/press/gojek-tokopedia-combine-goto
Graef, I. (2019). Rethinking the Essential Facilities Doctrine for the EU Digital Economy. Revue Juridique Thémis de l’Université de Montréal, 53(1), 33–72.
Graef, I. (2020). The Opportunities and Limits of Data Portability for Stimulating Competition and Innovation. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3740185
Graef, I., Husovec, M., & Purtova, N. (2018). Data Portability and Data Control: Lessons for an Emerging Concept in EU Law. German Law Journal, 19(06), 1360–1398.
Graef, I., & Prüfer, J. (2021). Governance of Data Sharing: a Law & Economics Proposal - Discussion Paper. Tilburg Law and Economy Center. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3774912Electroniccopyavailableat:https://ssrn.com/abstract=3774912
Guggenberger, N., Balkin, J. M., Duan, C., Martina, R., Nachbar, T., Palka, P., … Zebb, P. (2021). The Essential Facilities Doctrine in The Digital Economy: Dispelling Persistent Myths. Yale Journal of Law & Technology (Vol. 23). Retrieved from https://promarket.org/2020/12/07/essential-facilities-regulation-platform-
Hagiu, A., & Wright, J. (2023). Data-enabled learning, network effects, and competitive advantage. The RAND Journal of Economics, 54(4), 638–667. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-2171.12453
HHP Law Firm. (2023). Indonesia: Competition authority issues regulations on new approach to defining relevant market and paying administrative fines by instalments.
Indonesia Business Post. (2024, July 4). Shopee and Shopee Express sign ‘Behavioural Change Integrity Pact.’ Retrieved 02/11/2026 from https://indonesiabusinesspost.com/2277/Politics/shopee-and-shopee-express-sign-behavioural-change-integrity-pact
International Competition Network. (2011). Competition Enforcement and Consumer Welfare: Setting the Agenda. International Competition Network. Retrieved from https://www.internationalcompetitionnetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/SP_CWelfare2011.pdf
Jacobson, J. M. (2002). Exclusive Dealing, “Foreclosure”, and Consumer Harm. Antitrust Law Journal, 70(2), 311–369. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40843558
Kim, J.-Y. (2025). Data Portability and Interoperability Between Digital Platforms. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy. https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12643
KPPU. (2024, June 20). Shopee Ajukan Perubahan Perilaku pada Sidang Majelis di KPPU. Retrieved 02/11/2026 from https://kppu.go.id/blog/2024/06/shopee-ajukan-perubahan-perilaku-pada-sidang-majelis-di-kppu/
Li, K. (2026). The Chinese Path to Mandatory Data Sharing among Platform Enterprises: A Perspective on the Localized Reconstruction of the Essential Facilities Doctrine. International Journal of Social Sciences and Public Administration, 10(1), 32–43. https://doi.org/10.62051/ijsspa.v10n1.05
Lipsky, A. B., & Sidak, J. G. (1999). Essential Facilities. Stanford Law Review, 51(5), 1187–1248. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229408
Min, L. (2024, June 27). JURISTnews: Shopee agrees to adjust courier service practices after admitting to violating Indonesia competition law. Retrieved from https://www.jurist.org/news/2024/06/shopee-agrees-to-adjust-courier-service-practices-after-admitting-to-violating-indonesia-competition-law/
Papademetriou, T. (2007). European Union: Infringement of Competition Rules: The Microsoft Case. Retrieved from http://www.law.gov
Parluhutan, D. (2021). Analisis Hukum Kompetisi terhadap “Big Data” dan Doktrin “Essential Facility” dalam Transaksi Mergerdi Indonesia. Jurnal Persaingan Usaha, 1(1).
Piropato, M. A. (2000). Open Access and the Essential Facilities Doctrine: Promoting Competition and Innovation. Chicago Legal Forum, 13(1), 13.
Qinvi, N. U., & Nurul Laylan Hsb. (2025). Challenges in Competition Law Enforcement Against Data Monopoly in Indonesia’s Digital Economy. Justice Law Review, 1(2), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.64317/jlr.v1i2.21
Republik Indonesia. (1999). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 Tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat.
Republik Indonesia. (2022). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 27 Tahun 2022 Tentang Perlindungan Data Pribadi.
Rubinfeld, D., & Gal, M. (2016). Access Barriers to Big Data. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2830586
Santesteban, C., & Longpre, S. (2020). Effective Interoperability to Enhance Competition in Social Networking: Breaking Down Data-Driven Barriers to Entry. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3733851
Sipayung, G. N. (2025). Analisis penerapan Essential Facilities Doctrine terhadap pelaku usaha milik negara dalam perspektif hukum persaingan usaha (Undergraduate Thesis). Medan, Sumatera Utara: Universitas Sumatera Utara.
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2010). Penelitian Hukum Normatif : Suatu Tinjauan Singkat (1st ed.). Raja Grafindo Persada. Retrieved from http://inlislite.perpusnas.go.id
Susanto, V. Y. (2024, May 29). KPPU Menyelisik Shopee Soal Diskriminasi Jasa Kurir. Retrieved 02/10/2026 from https://insight.kontan.co.id/news/kppu-menyelisik-shopee-soal-diskriminasi-jasa-kurir?utm_source=chatgpt.com
United States (U.S. Department of Justice, A. D. (2019, June 4). The standard of review by courts in competition cases – Note by the United States. Competition Committee – Working Party No. 3 on Co-Operation and Enforcement. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved from www.oecd.org/daf/competition/standard-of-review-by-courts-in-competition-cases.htm
Van Siclen, S. (1996). The Essential Facilities Concept. Series Roundtables on Competition Policy No. 5; OCDE/GD(96)113. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). Paris, France.
Wardhana, N. (2018). Legal Analysis of The Doctrine of Essential Facilities Duties in The Indonesia Competition Law. Diponegoro Law Review, 03, 257–263. Retrieved from https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/224/383/case.html,
Wardhani, W. E. (2022, March). Analisis Yuridis Indikator Penyalahgunaan Posisi Dominan Menurut Pasal 25 Undang Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 Dalam Putusan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (Kppu) (Undergraduate Thesis). Universitas Brawijaya.
Zhang, J. (2023). The Paradox Of Data Portability and Lock-in Effects. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 36(2). Retrieved from https://www.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dian Aryani Kusady
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH).
