Formation of Laws Based on The Omnibus Method that Meet Standards of Meaningful Participation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i3.3069Keywords:
Omnibus Law, Cipta Kerja Law, Public ParticipationAbstract
The formation of laws based on the omnibus method attempts to combine various themes in one law and accelerate the legislative process, but has the potential to reduce the quality of participation. Using a legislative approach, comparative studies, and conceptual, this article analyzes how the concept and practice of community participation and what standards are used as benchmarks for meaningful participation in the formation of laws based on the omnibus method. As a result, a country that adheres to the concept of people's sovereignty must fulfill the principle of openness with community participation as its main pillar. Omnibus as a method in the formation of laws often reaps controversy because it does not provide sufficient public access and participation space for the community. The active involvement of the community and stakeholders or related parties affected to provide input and suggestions through a public consultation mechanism at the stages of submitting draft laws, discussions and joint approvals is a standard of meaningful participation that must be met in the formation of laws based on the omnibus method.
References
Anggono, B. D., and F. R. Firdaus. “Omnibus Law in Indonesia: A Comparison to the United States and Ireland.” Lentera Hukum, HeinOnline, 2020. https://heinonline.org/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/lenth7§ion=23.
Arifin, S. “Illiberal Tendencies in Indonesian Legislation: The Case of the Omnibus Law on Job Creation.” The Theory and Practice of Legislation, ahead of print, Taylor &Francis, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2021.1942374.
Arnstein, S. R. “A Ladder Of Citizen Participation.” Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35, no. 4 (1969): 216–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225.
Aryani, N. M., & Danyathi, A. P. L. “Quo Vadis Protection of The Basic Rights of Indonesian Workers: Highlighting The Omnibus Legislation and Job Creation Law.” Pandecta Research Law …, journal.unnes.ac.id, 2022. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/pandecta/article/view/34948.
Asshiddiqie, J., Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia, Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2006.
Asshiddiqie, J., Omnibus Law dan Penerapannya di Indonesia, Cetakan Kedua, Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2020.
Bariun, L. E., Masa Depan Otonomi Daerah Terhadap Keberlakuan Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja (Sentralisasi Ataukah Desentralisasi), Jakarta: Laporan Penelitian Kerjasama Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sulawesi Tenggara dengan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, 2021.
Bodnar, A., & Gliszczyńska-Grabias, A., “Strategic Lawsuits against Public Participation (SLAPPs), the Governance of Historical Memory in the Rule of Law Crisis, and the EU Anti-SLAPP Directive.” European Constitutional Law Review 19, no. 4 (2023): 642–63. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019624000063.
Buana, M. S., Menakar Omnibus Law dan Consolidation Law untuk Harmonisasi Peraturan Perundang-undangan Indonesia, Pendekatan Perbandingan Hukum Tata Negara, Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Hukum Tata Negara Ke-4, Jember, 2017.
Chandranegara, I. S., “Pengadopsian Mekanisme Fast-Track Legislation dalam Pengusulan Rancangan Undang-Undang oleh Presiden.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 21, no. 1 (2021): 123. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2021.V21.123-140.
de Cruz, P., Comparative Law in A Changing Word, London: Cavendish Publishing Limited, 1999.
Ebner, B., Liebenberg, S. C., and Visagie, I. J. H., “A New Omnibus Test of Fit Based on a Characterization of the Uniform Distribution.” Statistics, ahead of print, Taylor &Francis, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/02331888.2022.2133121.
Fadli, M., Perkembangan Peraturan Delegasi di Indoensia (The Development of Delegated Legsilation in Indonesia), Ringkasan Disertasi, Bandung: Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Padjajaran, 2012.
Fadli, M., Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Optik Politik Hukum, Malang: Nuswantara, 2021.
Faizal, Z. P. “Strict Liability in Environmental Dispute Responsibility before and after the Enabling of Omnibus Law.” Administrative and Environmental Law Review, jurnal.fh.unila.ac.id, 2021. https://jurnal.fh.unila.ac.id/index.php/aelr/article/view/2318.
Firdaus, F. R., “Pencegahan Korupsi Legislasi Melalui Penguatan Partisipasi Publik Dalam Proses Pembentukan Undang-Undang.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 17, no. 3 (2020): 282. https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v17i3.679.
Gijbels, I., Omelka, M., and Veraverbeke, N., “Omnibus Test for Covariate Effects in Conditional Copula Models.” Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, 2021. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047259X21000828.
Hayati, N. N. S., and Warjiyati, S., “Analisis Yuridis Konsep Omnibus Law Dalam Harmonisasi Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan, ejurnalunsam.id, 2021. https://ejurnalunsam.id/index.php/jhsk/article/view/2631.
Hébert, F., Causeur, D., and Emily, M., “Omnibus Testing Approach for Gene‐based Gene‐gene Interaction.” Statistics in Medicine, ahead of print, Wiley Online Library, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.9389.
Herlina, M. “Implementation Of Omnibus Model Regulations In The Establishment Of Regional Regulations” Fox Justi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, ejournal.seaninstitute.or.id, 2023. https://ejournal.seaninstitute.or.id/index.php/Justi/article/view/1906.
Hidayat, A., & Arifin, Z., “Politik Hukum Legislasi Sebagai Socio-Equilibrium Di Indonesia” Jurnal Ius Constituendum 4, no. 2 (2019): 133. https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v4i2.1654.
Huda, N., Presiden & Pembantu Presiden Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia, Yogyakarta: FH UII Press, 2019.
Indrati, M. F., Kumpulan Tulisan A. Hamid S. Attamimi: “Gesetzgebungswissenschaft sebagai salah satu upaya menanggulangi hutan belantara peraturan perundang-undangan”, Depok: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2021.
Juwana, S., Sistem dan Praktik Omnibus Law di Berbagai Negara dan Analisis RUU Cipta Kerja dari Perspektif Good Legislation Making, Yogyakarta: Indonesia Ocean Justice Initiative, 2020.
Keyzer, P., “La Trobe Law School, La Trobe University”, Australia, Materi Kuliah Tamu, The Indonesian Omnibus Law: Opportunities and Challenges, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, 29 Januari 2020.
Krajewski, M., “The Many-Faced Court: The Value of Participation in Annulment Proceedings.” European Constitutional Law Review 15, no. 2 (2019): 220–46. https://doi.org/10.1017/S157401961900018X.
Kristiyanto, E. N., “Urgensi Omnibus Law dalam Percepatan Reformasi Regulasi dalam Perspektif Hukum Progresif.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 20, no. 2 (2020): 233. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2020.V20.233-244.
Manan, B., Menyongsong Fajar Otonomi Daerah, Yogyakarta: Pusat Studi Hukum FH UII, 2004.
Mandak, A. P. A., Penerapan Partisipasi Masyarakat Bermakna Dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang Pascaputusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020. 13 (2024).
Massicotte, L., Omnibus Bills in Theory and Practice. n.d.
Naskah Akademik Rancangan Undang-Undang Tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan, Badan Keahlian DPR RI, 2022.
Palguna, I.D.G., Konstitusi Rakyat: Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Perubahan Undang-Undang Dasar, Depok: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2019.
Paputungan, M., & Bakhri, S., “Menyoal Pemenuhan Partisipasi Masyarakat Yang Bermakna Dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang Tentang Ibu Kota Negara” Al-Qisth Law Review 6, no. 2 (2023): 274. https://doi.org/10.24853/al-qisth.6.2.274-300.
Porras-Gómez & Antonio-Martín. “The EU Recovery Instrument and the Constitutional Implications of Its Expenditure.” European Constitutional Law Review 19, no. 1 (2023): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019622000323.
Redi, A. & Chandranegara, I. S., Omnibus Law Diskursus Pengadopsiannya ke Dalam Sistem Perundang-Undangan Nasional, Depok: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2020.
Republik Indonesia. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 tentang Pengujian Formil Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Republik Indonesia. Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945, Jakarta: MKRI, 2011.
Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2011 Nomor 82, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5729, sebagaimana telah diubah beberapa kali dan terakhir dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2022 tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2022 Nomor 143, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 6801.
Shapiro, S., & Murphy, R., “Public Participation without a Public: The Challenge for Administrative Policymaking.” Missouri Law Review 78 (2013).
Sodiki, A. Dari Dissenting Opinion Menuju Living Constitution (Pemikiran Hukum Prof. Dr. Achmad Sodiki, S.H. Hakim Konstitusi Periode 2008-2013), Malang: Universitas Brawijaya Press, 2014.
Strong, C. F., Modern Political Constitutions, the English Languange Book Society and Sidwick & Jackson, Limited, London, 1966.
Sy, C., Helmi, and Irawan, S. P., “Perluasan Makna Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 19, no. 4 (2022): 766–93.
Yuharningsih, “Laporan Aksi Perubahan Pelatihan Kepemimpinan Pengawas Angkatan CXCIV Tahun 2021 Tentang Pengembangan Fitur Aplikasi Partisipasiku untuk Optimalisasi Fungsi Analisis dan Evaluasi Peraturan Perundang-Undangan pada Pusat Analisis dan Evaluasi Hukum Nasional” Jakarta, 2021.
Yuliandri, Laporan Akhir Pengkajian Hukum tentang Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Penentuan Arah Kebijakan Prioritas Penyusunan Peraturan Perundang-undangan, Jakarta: Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Sistem Hukum Nasional, Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia RI, 2014.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Marsudi Dedi Putra, Heristiawan Aryo Wirotomo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH).
