The Duty of Notaries to Maintain Deed Confidentiality in the Perspective of Professional Ethics and Positive Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i3.3118Keywords:
Notary, deed confidentiality, professional ethics, legal responsibility, positive law.Abstract
The obligation of notaries to maintain the confidentiality of deeds is one of the core elements of their professional function as public officials. This duty derives not only from statutory provisions under the Law on Notary Office (UUJN) but also from professional ethics that protect the integrity of legal transactions and the privacy of the parties. However, in practice, notaries may face conflicting demands between safeguarding confidentiality and fulfilling legal obligations to provide information in judicial or administrative proceedings. This conflict creates a normative dilemma that requires further examination from the perspective of both positive law and professional ethics.
This study employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The statutory approach analyzes the provisions of the UUJN, the Notary Code of Ethics, and relevant laws governing confidentiality in legal services. The conceptual approach investigates the theories of legal responsibility, ethical accountability, and the principle of confidentiality as developed in professional legal doctrine. Meanwhile, the case approach examines judicial decisions in which notaries were required to disclose information or provide deed copies during litigation or law enforcement processes. These approaches aim to determine whether confidentiality is absolute or subject to lawful limitations.
The research concludes that confidentiality is not an unrestricted right but a qualified duty bound by ethical standards and legal boundaries. A balance must therefore be struck between the protection of private interests and the fulfillment of justice in legal proceedings. To ensure legal certainty, a clearer regulatory mechanism is needed one that defines the scope of confidentiality, the proper procedures for request and disclosure, and the legal consequences for violations. Strengthening ethical awareness and regulatory clarity will reinforce the notary’s role as both a guardian of trust and a servant of the legal system.
References
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. (2012). The Theory of Law and the State by Hans Kelsen. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press.
Harahap, M. Yahya. (2009). Indonesian Civil Procedural Law. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Kelsen, Hans. (1960). Pure Theory of Law (Reine Rechtslehre). Translated by Somardi. Bandung: Nusa Media.
Mertokusumo, Sudikno. (2010). Legal Interpretation: An Introduction. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Rahardjo, Satjipto. (2009). Law and Social Change. Bandung: Alumni.
Soekanto, Soerjono & Mamudji, Sri. (2006). Normative Legal Research: An Overview. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Utrecht, E. (1982). Introduction to Indonesian Law. Jakarta: Ichtiar Baru Van Hoeve.
Rato, Dominikus. (2012). Legal Ethics and the Indonesian Legal Profession. Malang: Setara Press.
Freeman, M. (2018). Ethics and the Legal Profession. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lumbanraja, S. (2021). “Confidentiality as Professional Liability in Notarial Practice.” Indonesian Journal of Legal Studies, 6(2), 245–261.
Wibowo, E. (2019). “Professional Ethics and Confidentiality in Notarial Practice.” Indonesian Law Review, 8(2), 220–238.
Nugraha, D. A. (2021). “Confidentiality Obligations and Notarial Liability in Legal Disputes.” Jurnal Hukum dan Kenotariatan, 5(4), 610–625.
Susanto, H. (2022). “The Role of Ethics in Notarial Accountability in Indonesia.” Journal of Advanced Legal Research, 4(1), 78–92.
Atkinson, B. (2017). “Confidentiality and Public Interest in Legal Professions.” Journal of Legal Ethics and Policy, 10(3), 55–71.
Tan, J. (2020). “Privacy and Legal Duty of Disclosure: A Comparative Perspective.” Asian Journal of Legal Studies, 9(1), 32–49.
Prasetyo, D. (2021). “Judicial Interpretation of Confidentiality in Legal Proceedings.” Journal of Law and Justice, 15(3), 403–420.
Law No. 2 of 2014 concerning the Amendment to Law No. 30 of 2004 on the Office of Notary. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Year 2014 No. 3.
Code of Ethics of Indonesian Notary Association (INI).
Government Regulation No. 24 of 2016 concerning the Amendment to Government Regulation No. 37 of 1998 on the Position of Land Deed Official (PPAT)
Supreme Court Decision No. 855 K/AG/2016.
Supreme Court Decision No. 2989 K/Pdt/2018.
Supreme Court Decision No. 46 PK/Pdt/2020.
Supreme Court Decision No. 306 K/AG/2021.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Andi Moh. Taufiq Hidayat, Miftakhul Huda

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH).























