The Relevance of Certainty and Fairness to Notary Honorarium Values in the Notary Position Law

Authors

  • I Gusti Agung Wisnu Satria Wangsa Universitas Warmadewa
  • I Made Suwitra Universitas Warmadewa
  • I Wayan Kartika Jaya Utama Universitas Warmadewa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i3.3121

Keywords:

Notary, Honorarium, Certainty, Justice

Abstract

This study discusses the regulation of notary fees in Article 36 of the Notary Law (UUJN) in relation to the principles of legal certainty and justice. The problem arises because this provision regulates the maximum fee, but does not provide clear parameters regarding economic and sociological values, nor does it regulate the minimum fee. This study uses a normative legal research method with a regulatory approach and a conceptual approach using primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The results of the study show that the regulation of notary fees provides legal legitimacy for notaries to receive compensation for the legal services they provide and aims to provide legal protection for notaries and the public. However, the ambiguity of the norms in this provision has the potential to cause differences in interpretation and tariff competition between notaries. Therefore, the determination of notary fees needs to be done proportionally by taking into account legal provisions, professional codes of ethics, and social conditions.

References

Adjie, H. (2014a). Hukum Notaris Indonesia: Tafsir tematik terhadap UU No. 30 tahun 2004 tentang jabatan notaris.

Adjie, H. (2014b). Merajut Pemikiran dalam Dunia Notaris dan Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah. Cetakan Kedua,(Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2014).

Amin Sinaga, H., & Sharfina Desiandri, Y. (2024). Pemenuhan Hak-Hak Politik Penyandang Disabilitas Terhadap Masalah HAM Di Indonesia. Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi, 5(3), 967–973. https://doi.org/10.55338/saintek.v5i3.2387

Aulia, K. N., Lestari, A., Latief, L. M., & Fajarwati, N. K. (2024). Kepastian hukum dan keadilan hukum dalam pandangan ilmu komunikasi. Journal Sains Student Research, 2(1), 713–724. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.61722/jssr.v2i1.1006

Barkah, Q., Andriyani, M. S., & SY, M. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum. Palembang. CV. Doki Course and Training.

Chisbiyah, N. (2025). Kepatuhan terhadap Kode Etik Notaris sebagai Fondasi Profesionalisme dan Kunci Kepercayaan Publik. Jurnal Ilmiah Nusantara, 2(3), 259–269. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.61722/jinu.v2i3.4457

Dyatma Shafiradini, F. (2022). Batasan Masyarakat Tidak Mampu Yang Bisa Mendapatkan Jasa Pembuatan Akta Tanpa Dipungut Honorarium. Jurnal Officium Notarium, 2(1), 140–149. https://doi.org/10.20885/JON.vol2.iss1.art15

Endi Pratama, & Ni Luh Gede Astariyani. (2025). Peran Notaris Dalam Memperkuat Fungsi Hukum Sebagai Sarana Rekayasa Sosial. Acta Comitas, 10(02), 275–289. https://doi.org/10.24843/AC.2025.v10.i02.p4

Erika, E., Hamid, A. H., & Abdurrifai, A. (2025). PENERAPAN PEMBERIAN LAYANAN NOTARIS SECARA CUMA-CUMA KEPADA MASYARAKAT TIDAK MAMPU DI TANA TORAJA. Clavia, 23(1), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.56326/clavia.v23i1.5628

Faedhatu, R., Hermawan, S., & Mulyanto, M. (2024). Analisis UUJN tentang Standar Honor Notaris dalam Menjalankan Kewenangan selain Membuat Akta Otentik. Iapa Proceedings Conference, 316. https://doi.org/10.30589/proceedings.2024.1061

Faradina, F. (2024). ANALISIS TENTANG PERSAINGAN TIDAK SEHAT ANTAR REKAN NOTARIS SEBAGAI DAMPAK DARI PENETAPAN TARIF JASA NOTARIS DIBAWAH STANDAR. JKIH : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum, 3(2), 76–90. https://doi.org/10.55583/jkih.v3i02.1013

Gunarto, H., Bachrudin, H., & Soponyono, H. E. (2019). Hukum Kenotariatan: Membangun Sistem Kenotariatan Indonesia Berkeadilan.

Indriet Pratiwi Wiranita Wiratmodja, & Romlan. (2022). IMPLEMENTASI KODE ETIK NOTARIS DALAM AKTIVITAS NOTARIS SEBAGAI PEJABAT UMUM. Justicia Journal, 11(2), 99–119. https://doi.org/10.32492/jj.v11i2.11202

IRIANTORO, A., & UTAMA, I. W. K. J. (2025). Ownership of Land Ownership Rights by Traditional Villages Viewed from Indonesian Law. Protection: Journal Of Land And Environmental Law, 3(3), 221–226. https://doi.org/10.38142/pjlel.v1i3.974

Kansil, C. S. T., & Christine, S. T. K. (2006). Pokok-Pokok Etika Profesi Hukum, Jakarta: PT. Pradnya Paramita.

Kusuma, A., & Bagiastra, I. N. (2022). Akibat Hukum Bagi Notaris yang Tidak Memungut Honorarium pada Para Pihak. ACTA COMITAS Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan,(7), 1. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.24843/AC.2022.v07.i01.p03

Laily Az Zahra, K., Mufid Al Amjad, M. F., Nabya Maulidian, S., Silvia, S., & Azfa Asyifa, F. (2024). RELEVANSI KEPENTINGAN ALAT-ALAT BUKTI DALAM PROSES PENYELESAIAN HUKUM PERDATA. The Juris, 8(1), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.56301/juris.v8i1.1185

Mohammad Adzan. (2025). Perlindungan Hukum Pelaku Usaha dalam Sengketa Kontraktual Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Konstruksi Pemerintah Ditinjau dari Aspek Hukum Perdata. JISPENDIORA Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Pendidikan Dan Humaniora, 3(3), 164–184. https://doi.org/10.56910/jispendiora.v3i3.3091

Nofriandi, P., Atmojo, K., & Ngurah, I. G. A. (2023). Kekuatan Hukum Akta Otentik Sebagai Alat Bukti Kepemilikan Tanah (Studi Putusan Kasasi MA Nomor 445 K/Pid/2020). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55129/.v12i1.2447

Pyarrani, D., & Burhanuddin, S. F. (2025). Peran Notaris dalam Menjamin Keabsahan dan Autentisitas Akta Kredit Perbankan. JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW, 8(3), 2106–2122. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v8i3.10081

Saputra, R., Fendri, A., & Delfiyanti, D. (2023). Penetapan Honorarium Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta di Kota Pariaman. UNES Law Review, 6(1), 2905–2921. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1088

Sembiring, R. (2018). Keadilan Pancasila dalam Persepektif Teori Keadilan Aristoteles. Jurnal Aktual Justice, 3(2), 139–155. https://doi.org/10.47329/aktualjustice.v3i2.539

Sirait, G. N. A., & Djaja, B. (2023). Pertanggungjawaban Akta Notaris Sebagai Akta Autentik Sesuai Dengan Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris. Unes Law Review, 5(4), 3363–3378. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.641

Siringoringo, M. P. (2022). PENGATURAN DAN PENERAPAN JAMINAN KEBEBASAN BERAGAMA SEBAGAI HAK ASASI MANUSIA DALAM PERSPEKTIF UUD 1945 SEBAGAI HUKUM DASAR NEGARA. Nommensen Journal of Legal Opinion, 111–124. https://doi.org/10.51622/njlo.v3i1.618

Sirojul Hakim, M. D., & Santoso, B. (2025). Analisis Kewajiban Notaris Dalam Memberikan Jasa Hukum Kepada Orang Yang Tidak Mampu. Law, Development and Justice Review, 8(3), 274–293. https://doi.org/10.14710/ldjr.8.2025.274-293

Tenggara, A. P. (2024). Implementasi Kewenangan Penyuluhan Hukum oleh Notaris. Notary Law Journal, 3(1), 30–47. https://doi.org/10.32801/nolaj.v3i1.56

Utama, I. W. K. J. U. (2019). TANGGUNG GUGAT NOTARIS SELAKU PEJABAT UMUM DALAM PEMBUATAN PERJANJIAN KREDIT PERBANKAN. DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 15(1), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.30996/dih.v15i1.2261

Downloads

Published

2026-03-16

How to Cite

Wangsa, I. G. A. W. S., Suwitra, I. M., & Utama, I. W. K. J. (2026). The Relevance of Certainty and Fairness to Notary Honorarium Values in the Notary Position Law. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 6(3), 1741–1753. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i3.3121

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 I Gusti Agung Wisnu Satria Wangsa, I Made Suwitra, I Wayan Kartika Jaya Utama

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:

  1. The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
  2. The author acknowledges that the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
  3. Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH).