Legal Protection for Directors Against Allegations of Directors' Negligence Resulting in Losses to the Company

Authors

  • Yoyo Arifardhani Universitas Pancasila
  • Ibnu Masúd Universitas Pancasila

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i3.3137

Keywords:

Business Judgment Rule, Director Negligence, Civil Liability

Abstract

This study aims to analyze legal protection for directors against allegations of negligence resulting in losses for the company in the Indonesian legal system. The method used is normative legal research with a statutory approach and case studies through a comparative analysis of two court decisions, namely the Bekasi District Court Decision Number 647/Pdt.G/2021/PN Bks and the Surabaya District Court Decision Number 565/Pdt.G/2024/PN Surabaya. The results of the study indicate that the civil liability of directors is based on proof of the element of error or negligence, not solely on the occurrence of losses for the company. The Business Judgment Rule principle adopted through Article 97 paragraph (5) of Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies provides conditional protection to directors who act in good faith, with professional prudence, and within the limits of legitimate formal authority. This study emphasizes the importance of a clear distinction between reasonable business risks and directors' negligence as a basis for determining legal liability proportionally and fairly.

References

Anshari, M. A., Isnani, H., Perdana, H. B., & Maulana, S. (2025). Kajian Prinsip Business Judgement Rule Dalam Hukum Perusahaan Study of the Principles of Business Judgment Rule in Corporate Law Artikel Penelitian Tata Kelola Perusahaan yang Baik ( Good Corporate Governance ) yang selanjutnya disingkat tindakan pengurusan yang mengakibatkan kerugian ; dan penulisan artikel ini dengan judul " Kajian Prinsip Business Judgement Rule Dalam Hukum Perusahaan ” Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu. 8(6), 3844–3856. https://doi.org/10.56338/jks.v8i6.7901

Asni, L. J., Azheri, B., Fauzi, W., & Arben, A. (2025). Tanggung Jawab Direksi Atas Penyalahgunaan Dana Pemegang Saham Yang Dititipkan Pada Perusahaan ( Study Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Nomor 892 / Pdt / 2021 / Pt . Sby ). 3(1), 38–45.

Bagaskara, F. P. (2023). Akuntabilitas Direksi dalam Perseroan Terbatas Yang melakukan perbuatan melawan hukum. 1(1).

Ekotrans, J. I., Fauzi, E., & Wahyuni, S. (2025). JIEE : The Moral Struggle of the Theory of Reversal of the Burden of Proof in the Accountability of Directors Based on the Principle of the Business Judgment Rule in Achieving Justice. 5, 77–86.

Firmansyah, A., & Machmud, A. (2024). Peran BUMN sebagai Pilar Utama Ekonomi Nasional yang Mandiri : Sebuah Kajian Hukum Korporasi. 13, 517–528. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v13i2.952

Franialdo, D. S., Hariyani, I., & Prakoso, B. (2024). Tanggung Gugat Direksi Terhadap Audit Laporan Keuangan Pt Garuda Indonesia ( Persero ) Tbk Ditinjau Melalui Doktrin Fiduciary Duty. 8(1), 48–65. https://doi.org/10.52166/mimbar.v7i2

Fransisca, T., Nababan, R., Nurkhaerani, E., Pembangunan, U., & Veteran, N. (2025). Pertanggungjawaban Direksi Atas Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Berupa Penyatuan Harta dalam Kepailitan Perseroan.

Gultom, J. I., & Nababan, R. (2025). Tanggung jawab pribadi direksi terhadap tindakan kepengurusan yang merugikan perusahaan. 07(1), 510–521.

Haetami, V., Abas, M., Rahmatiar, Y., & Lubis, A. (2024). Tinjauan Normatif Tentang Tanggung Jawab Direksi Terhadap Karyawan yang Melakukan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Memberikan Diskon Secara Sepihak Ditinjau Dari Doktrin Piercing The Corporate Veil dan Dihubungkan dengan Undang- Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 Tentang Perseroan Terbatas ( Studi Putusan Nomor 1666 K / Pdt / 2022 ). 6(3), 8953–8962.

Hukum, T., Syariah, E., Harahap, F. R., & Rokan, M. K. (2025). Pertanggungjawaban Perdata Direksi atas Peredaran Bahan Bakar Minyak RON 90 sebagai RON 92. 14(2), 395–407.

Idayanti, S. (2024). Responsibility of The Board of Directors in Bankruptcy of Limited Liability Companies from The Perspective of Law Number 40 Of 2007. 23(1), 1752–1760.

Justisia, P., Justisia, P., Komunikasi, M., & Kajian, D. A. N. (2025). GOVERNMENT-OWNED ENTERPRISES MAKING INVESTMENTS WITH THIRD. 24(1), 3947–3962.

Lee, E. P., Xaviera, G. H., Yohanes, J., Kwu, P. S., & Nathanael, S. C. (2026). Hubungan Antara Pelanggaran Fiduciary Duty dan Personal Liability Direksi dalam Kepailitan Perseroan Terbatas. 4(5), 3804–3814.

Made, N., Sutariujianti, P., Hukum, F., Warmadewa, U., Hukum, P., Terbatas, P., & Ketiga, P. (2021). Perlindungan hukum terhadap pihak ke tiga akibat direksi melakukan tindakan di luar anggaran dasar perseroan terbatas. 2(3), 507–512.

Maharani, A., Hanifah, N., Suryanti, N., Yuanitasari, D., Hukum, F., & Padjadjaran, U. (2024). Analisis Penerapan Doktrin Business Judgment Rule Terhadap Keputusan Direktur Utama PT Krakatau Steel Tbk Dalam Kasus Pembangunan Blast Furnace Complex. 2(1).

Mokoagow, H. A., Waha, C. J. J., & Pinori, J. J. (2025). Tanggungjawab Direksi Terhadap Risiko Terjadinya Kerugian Akibat Kepailitan Perusahaan Menurut Undang-Undang No . 40 Tahun 2007 Tentang Perseroan Terbatas. 5, 705–715.

Musliaroza, M. R., & Sholeh, A. U. (2026). KERUGIAN PERUSAHAAN DITINJAU DARI PRINSIP FIDUCIARY. 10(1), 480–486.

Nadeev, I. Y. (2024). THE LEGAL NATURE OF THE DIRECTOR ’ S LIABILITY FOR THE HARM CAUSED TO A BUSINESS COMPANY.

Panjaitan, D., Panjaitan, H., & Saragi, P. (2025). Legal Consequences and Liability of Actions by Directors and Commissioners After Term Expiry.

Pardamean, M. C. (2024). Pertanggungjawaban Direksi Atas Tindak Pidana Korporasi. 6(2), 7365–7372.

Pedro, A., Nugroho, K. W., Ria, D., & Napitupulu, W. (2025). Banking Responsibility for Employee Fault. 5(6), 280–288.

Permadi, I., & Hadi, H. R. (2021). Research in Business & Social Science The legal protection weakness of the directors board from the risk of losses due to business decisions. 10(2), 306–310.

Ristita, S. D., Sakti, M., & Meliala, A. J. (2025). International Journal of Social Science and Human Research Strategic Regulatory Solutions for Implementing Business Judgment Rule in State-Owned Enterprise Governance. 08(05), 2715–2726. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v8-i5-11

Sakinah, S. H. (2025). Perlindungan Hukum dan Batas Pertanggungjawaban Direksi dalam Pengelolaan Perusahaan Publik Berdasarkan UU Perseroan Terbatas Legal Protection and the Limits of Directors ’ Liability in the Management of Public Companies under the Limited Liability Company Act Universita Singaperbangsa Karawang , Indonesia. 10(1), 146–162.

Sembiring, I., Syahrin, A., Mulyadi, M., & Siregar, M. (2023). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Perseroan Terbatas dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Direksi dalam Tindak Pidana Lingkungan. 2(5), 371–376.

Sinaga, V. H., Lumbuun, T. G., Latief, A., & Budiman, A. (2024). The Responsibilities of the Board of Directors in Limited Liability Companies : A Comparative Analysis of the Business Judgment Rule in the United States , the Netherlands , and Indonesia. 3(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.37893/jv.v3i1.1134

Studies, M. (2023). Ideal construction of directors’ responsibility regulation as an organ of a limited company based on justice value. 5(02), 140–158.

Sufiarina, S., Ali, M., Mufrina, M., Sufiarina, S., Ali, M., & Mufrina, M. (2023). Legal Dynamics of Limited Liability Companies : Unveiling the Power of Commissioners and Shareholders to Take Legal Action Against Directors ’ Negligence Cite this article as Legal Dynamics of Limited Liability Companies : Unveiling the Power of Commissioners and Shareholders to Take Legal Action Against Directors ’ Negligence. 265–288.

Sunter, J., Raya, P., Rw, R. T., & Agung, S. (2024). Tanggung Jawab Direksi Perseroan Terbatas Atas Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Di Indonesia Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Jakarta.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-11

How to Cite

Arifardhani, Y., & Ibnu Masúd. (2026). Legal Protection for Directors Against Allegations of Directors’ Negligence Resulting in Losses to the Company. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 6(3), 2137–2150. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i3.3137