Criminal Sentencing of Doctors as Perpetrators of Sexual Violence Against Patients from the Perspective of the Objectives of Punishment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i3.3096Keywords:
Criminalization, Doctor, Sexual Violence Crimes, Patient.Abstract
Sexual violence committed by doctors against patients constitutes a serious criminal offense that not only violates criminal law provisions but also undermines human values, professional ethics, and public trust in healthcare services. The unequal power relations between doctors and patients place victims in a vulnerable position, thus requiring a fair, firm, and victim-oriented sentencing system. This research aims to analyze the legal regulation and application of criminal sentences for sexual violence committed by doctors against patients within the Indonesian criminal law system, as well as to formulate ideal sentencing policies for the future. The research problems are formulated as follows: (1) how are the legal regulations and implementation of sentences for sexual violence committed by doctors against patients within the Indonesian criminal law system; and (2) how should future sentencing policies for such crimes be developed from the perspective of Indonesian criminal law. This study employs normative legal research methods using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, particularly through the analysis of Decision of the Palembang District Court Number 919/Pid.B/2024/PN Plg. The data are analyzed qualitatively using descriptive-analytical methods. The results of this study indicate that, normatively, the legal framework governing sentencing for sexual violence has been established in the Criminal Code (KUHP), Law Number 12 of 2022 concerning Sexual Violence Crimes, and other relevant regulations. However, in practice, the implementation of sentencing still faces various obstacles, particularly in terms of evidentiary challenges, unequal power relations between doctors and patients, and victims' reluctance to report due to social stigma and psychological pressure. Furthermore, the sentence imposed in court decisions has not fully reflected substantive justice, as it has not thoroughly considered the psychological impact and long-term trauma experienced by victims. Based on these findings, it is recommended that legal regulations be strengthened, particularly regarding sentencing enhancements for perpetrators from certain professions, improvement of evidentiary mechanisms, and integration of criminal sanctions with administrative and professional ethical sanctions. Accordingly, the sentencing system is expected to provide maximum protection for victims, create a deterrent.
References
Adi, U. A., Daniel, A., & Yemima, A. D. (2022). Tinjauan yuridis terhadap tindak pidana pelecehan seksual dalam pertanggungjawaban pidana. Lex Crimen, 11(4).
Amrullah, S. (2020). Perlindungan hukum terhadap korban tindak pidana pemerkosaan. Jurnal Andi Djemma: Jurnal Pendidikan, 3(1).
Bahagijo, S., et al. (2022). Laporan penelitian needs assessment: Analisis tantangan implementasi dan kebutuhan operasionalisasi Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual (UU TPKS). International NGO Forum for Indonesian Development (INFID).
Bahiej, A. (2003). Tinjauan yuridis atas delik perzinahan (overspel) dalam hukum pidana Indonesia. Sosio-Religia, 2(2).
Chazawi, A. (2013). Pelajaran hukum pidana bagian 1. Rajawali Pers.
Effendi, E. (2011). Hukum pidana Indonesia: Suatu pengantar. Refika Aditama.
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP).
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP)
Manuputty, S. H. (2023). Analisis Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual berdasarkan teori formil (formielle theorie). Jurnal Demokrasi dan Ketahanan Nasional, 2(1).
Matippanna, A. (2022). Tanggung jawab hukum rumah sakit terhadap pasien dalam pelaksanaan pelayanan kesehatan. Amerta Media.
Nurdiana, R. A. M. A. (2015). Tindak pidana pemerkosaan: Realitas kasus dan penegakan hukumnya di Indonesia.
Putusan Hakim Nomor: 919/Pid.B/2024/PN.Plg.
Rachmayani, A. N. (2015). Kode etik keperawatan Indonesia. Yayasan Kita Menulis.
Rahardjo, S. (2009). Penegakan hukum progresif. Kompas.
Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Dasar Tahun 1945 Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia.
Setiady, T. (2010). Pokok-pokok hukum panitensier Indonesia. Alfabeta.
Soekanto, S. (2008). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penegakan hukum. Rajawali Pers.
Stephanie, S., & Surbakti, A. D. S. (2024). Analisis yuridis pencegahan dan penanganan kekerasan seksual di lingkungan Universitas Prima Indonesia. Unes Law Review, 6(4).
Suhartoyo. (2019). Argumen pembalikan beban pembuktian sebagai metode prioritas dalam pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi dan tindak pidana pencucian uang. Rajawali Pers.
Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2022 Tentang Tindak Pidana kekerasan Seksual
Undang-Undang Nomor 29 Tahun 2004 tentang Praktik Kedokteran
Yuliani, D. (2024). Analisis putusan hakim dalam perkara tindak pidana pelecehan seksual dokter terhadap pasien (Studi putusan Nomor 114/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Idi) (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pratiwi Dwi Saputri, Hafrida, Herry Liyus

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH).























