Criminal Sentencing of Doctors as Perpetrators of Sexual Violence Against Patients from the Perspective of the Objectives of Punishment

Authors

  • Pratiwi Dwi Saputri Program Study Master of Law, Jambi University, Indonesia
  • Hafrida Program Study Master of Law, Jambi University, Indonesia
  • Herry Liyus Program Study Master of Law, Jambi University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i3.3096

Keywords:

Criminalization, Doctor, Sexual Violence Crimes, Patient.

Abstract

Sexual violence committed by doctors against patients constitutes a serious criminal offense that not only violates criminal law provisions but also undermines human values, professional ethics, and public trust in healthcare services. The unequal power relations between doctors and patients place victims in a vulnerable position, thus requiring a fair, firm, and victim-oriented sentencing system. This research aims to analyze the legal regulation and application of criminal sentences for sexual violence committed by doctors against patients within the Indonesian criminal law system, as well as to formulate ideal sentencing policies for the future. The research problems are formulated as follows: (1) how are the legal regulations and implementation of sentences for sexual violence committed by doctors against patients within the Indonesian criminal law system; and (2) how should future sentencing policies for such crimes be developed from the perspective of Indonesian criminal law. This study employs normative legal research methods using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, particularly through the analysis of Decision of the Palembang District Court Number 919/Pid.B/2024/PN Plg. The data are analyzed qualitatively using descriptive-analytical methods. The results of this study indicate that, normatively, the legal framework governing sentencing for sexual violence has been established in the Criminal Code (KUHP), Law Number 12 of 2022 concerning Sexual Violence Crimes, and other relevant regulations. However, in practice, the implementation of sentencing still faces various obstacles, particularly in terms of evidentiary challenges, unequal power relations between doctors and patients, and victims' reluctance to report due to social stigma and psychological pressure. Furthermore, the sentence imposed in court decisions has not fully reflected substantive justice, as it has not thoroughly considered the psychological impact and long-term trauma experienced by victims. Based on these findings, it is recommended that legal regulations be strengthened, particularly regarding sentencing enhancements for perpetrators from certain professions, improvement of evidentiary mechanisms, and integration of criminal sanctions with administrative and professional ethical sanctions. Accordingly, the sentencing system is expected to provide maximum protection for victims, create a deterrent.

References

Adi, U. A., Daniel, A., & Yemima, A. D. (2022). Tinjauan yuridis terhadap tindak pidana pelecehan seksual dalam pertanggungjawaban pidana. Lex Crimen, 11(4).

Amrullah, S. (2020). Perlindungan hukum terhadap korban tindak pidana pemerkosaan. Jurnal Andi Djemma: Jurnal Pendidikan, 3(1).

Bahagijo, S., et al. (2022). Laporan penelitian needs assessment: Analisis tantangan implementasi dan kebutuhan operasionalisasi Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual (UU TPKS). International NGO Forum for Indonesian Development (INFID).

Bahiej, A. (2003). Tinjauan yuridis atas delik perzinahan (overspel) dalam hukum pidana Indonesia. Sosio-Religia, 2(2).

Chazawi, A. (2013). Pelajaran hukum pidana bagian 1. Rajawali Pers.

Effendi, E. (2011). Hukum pidana Indonesia: Suatu pengantar. Refika Aditama.

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP).

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP)

Manuputty, S. H. (2023). Analisis Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual berdasarkan teori formil (formielle theorie). Jurnal Demokrasi dan Ketahanan Nasional, 2(1).

Matippanna, A. (2022). Tanggung jawab hukum rumah sakit terhadap pasien dalam pelaksanaan pelayanan kesehatan. Amerta Media.

Nurdiana, R. A. M. A. (2015). Tindak pidana pemerkosaan: Realitas kasus dan penegakan hukumnya di Indonesia.

Putusan Hakim Nomor: 919/Pid.B/2024/PN.Plg.

Rachmayani, A. N. (2015). Kode etik keperawatan Indonesia. Yayasan Kita Menulis.

Rahardjo, S. (2009). Penegakan hukum progresif. Kompas.

Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Dasar Tahun 1945 Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia.

Setiady, T. (2010). Pokok-pokok hukum panitensier Indonesia. Alfabeta.

Soekanto, S. (2008). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penegakan hukum. Rajawali Pers.

Stephanie, S., & Surbakti, A. D. S. (2024). Analisis yuridis pencegahan dan penanganan kekerasan seksual di lingkungan Universitas Prima Indonesia. Unes Law Review, 6(4).

Suhartoyo. (2019). Argumen pembalikan beban pembuktian sebagai metode prioritas dalam pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi dan tindak pidana pencucian uang. Rajawali Pers.

Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2022 Tentang Tindak Pidana kekerasan Seksual

Undang-Undang Nomor 29 Tahun 2004 tentang Praktik Kedokteran

Yuliani, D. (2024). Analisis putusan hakim dalam perkara tindak pidana pelecehan seksual dokter terhadap pasien (Studi putusan Nomor 114/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Idi) (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung).

Downloads

Published

2026-03-08

How to Cite

Pratiwi Dwi Saputri, Hafrida, & Herry Liyus. (2026). Criminal Sentencing of Doctors as Perpetrators of Sexual Violence Against Patients from the Perspective of the Objectives of Punishment . Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 6(3), 1540–1551. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i3.3096