Configuration of Assets of Criminal Offenders Taxation From A Perspective Criminal Procedure Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i5.470Keywords:
Confiscation of Assets, Tax Crimes, Criminal Procedural LawAbstract
The aim of this research is first, to determine and analyze the confiscation of assets of perpetrators of tax crimes from the perspective of criminal procedural law. Second, to find out and analyze future criminal law policies regarding the regulation of confiscation of assets of perpetrators of tax crimes from the perspective of criminal procedural law. The legal issues discussed in this normative research are: First, what are the legal regulations for confiscating assets of perpetrators of tax crimes? Second, what will be the future criminal law policy regarding the regulation of confiscation of assets of perpetrators of tax crimes from the perspective of criminal procedural law? The research method used is normative juridical with approaches (Statue Approach, (Conceptual Approach), (case approach), and (comparative approach). The legal material in this research was collected through literature studies, laws, government regulations, as well as regulations under law, journals, and legal cases used by this author. As well as other supporting materials. The results of this research show that the Asset Confiscation Bill is an opportunity to recover state losses in Indonesia. With the existence of an asset confiscation mechanism, eradication law enforcement uses two mechanisms, namely penal and non-penal. This is because, confiscation of assets without criminal prosecution does not eliminate the mechanism for criminal prosecution of the perpetrator's crimes in court. The scheme used by developed countries in connection with the confiscation of assets resulting from criminal acts is unexplained wealth. In the context of the Indonesian legal system, there is a need for reform both in terms of juridical, concept and paradigm which must be carried out synergistically and sustainably. Therefore, to enforce unexplained wealth, there must be a comprehensive and accommodating regulatory framework as shown in the Criminal Asset Confiscation Bill.
References
Atmasasmita, Romli, Confiscation of Assets through Reverse Evidence: Comparative Study of Criminal Law, paper at the Focus Group Discussion held by the Indonesian National Police Headquarters , Hotel Borobudur, Jakarta, 10 March 2011.
Center for Financial Transaction Reporting & Analysis, Memorie van Toelechting: Discussion of the Draft Law Concerning the Prevention and Eradication of the Crime of Money Laundering, Book One, Jakarta: PPATK, 2011, p. 726.
Center for Financial Transaction Reports & Analysis , Loc.Cit.
John Locke "The policy of a person who makes the law does not consist only of the basis of justice, but also of its application considering in what way the law obtains certainty.
Prasetyo, DR (2016). Confiscation and confiscation of assets resulting from corruption as an effort to impoverish corruptors. DiH: Journal of Legal Studies , 12 (24), pp. 149-163.
Reda Manthovani & R. Narendra Jatna, Anti-Money Laundering Regime and Proceeds of Crime in Indonesia, Jakarta: UAI Press, 2011, p. 74.
Typhoon Faithful Prawira. "Use of the PPATK Analysis Result Report (LHA) in Investigating Money Laundering Crimes by National Police Investigators." Literate Syntax; Indonesian Scientific Journal 7. no . 5, 2022, 626
Yanuar, Muh. Ritually pure. Crime of Money Laundering and Asset Confiscation, Malang: Setara Press, 2021.
Yunus Husein, Legal Explanation regarding Confiscation of Assets Without Punishment in Corruption Crime Cases, Center for Legal and Policy Studies & Center for Legal and Judicial Research and Development of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Jakarta, 2019, p. 6
Yunus Husein, Anti-Money Laundering Potions , Bandung: Books Terrace and Library , 2007 .
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Defry Romandhany, Sahuri Lasmadi, Herry Liyus
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH).