Principle of Good Faith in Peace Agreements via Mediation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i2.316Keywords:
Mediation, Peace Agreement, Good faith.Abstract
Many people have selected mediation as a dispute resolution procedure to get the best agreement and solution. However, it is not uncommon for parties to fail to consistently implement an agreement reached through mediation. The purpose of this article is to examine the essence of peace agreements reached through mediation, as well as the importance of the principle of good faith as a form of protection for the parties involved in such agreements. This is normative research that takes both a statutory and conceptual approach. The exploration of data in the form of primary and secondary legal materials was carried out through a literature review and descriptive-qualitative analysis. The analytical results reveal that the mediation process, which concludes with a peace agreement, represents the end of a dispute based on the ideals of benefit and justice. On that premise, its execution must be based on the principle of good faith to provide legal protection to the parties, whether mediation takes place in or out of court. Good faith in implementing a peace agreement is interpreted as an attitude that develops within the parties in dispute to carry out their commitments as a moral obligation to obey and accomplish things that have been agreed upon voluntarily.
References
Afriana, A. (2017). Mediasi In Court Untuk Mewujudkan Kepastian Hukum Berdasarkan Win-Win Solution. Akta Yudisia.2 (2), 1-20.
Arifin, M. (2020). Membangun Konsep Ideal Penerapan Asas Iktikad Baik Dalam Hukum Perjanjian. Ius Constituendum. 5(1), 66-82.
Asikin, Z. (2018). Hukum Acara Perdata Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana.
Asnawi, M. N. (2017). Perlindungan Hukum Kontrak Dalam Perspektif Hukum Kontrak Kontemporer. Masalah-Masalah Hukum. 46(1), 66-82.
B.Salinding, M. (2017). Dasar Filosofi Mediasi Sebagai Pilihan Penyelesaian Sengketa Lingkungan Hidup. Borneo Law Review. 1(1), 39-57.
Busroh, F. F. (2017). Peranan Tokoh Adat Sebagai Mediator Sosial Dalam Menyelesaiakan Konflik Agraria Yang Melibatkan Mayarakat Adat Multikultural Di Indonesia(Perspektif Kajian Socio Legal Research). Mimbar Justitia.3(1), 97-116.
C.Pongoh, H. (2015). Manfaat Perdamaian Dalam Perkara Perdata Di Pengadilan Negeri. Lex Et Societis. 3(9), 146-153.
Elizabeth Wilson-Evered, J. Z. (2021). Online Family Dispute Resolution : Evidence For Creating The Ideal People And Technology Interface. Switzerland: Springer Nature.
Fajar Sugianto, d. (2020). Idealisasi Sifat Alternatif Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Mediasi. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune, 253-265.
Fajar Sugianto, F. C. (2020). Idealisasi Sifat Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Mediasi Di Pengadilan. Bina Mulia Hukum. 3 (2), 253-265.
Haq, H. S. (2010). Mediasi Komunitas Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Jateng: Lakeisha.
Harahap, M. (2005). Ruang Lingkup Permasalahan Eksekusi Bidang Perdata (Edisi Kedua). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Hernoko, A. Y. (2010). Hukum Perjanjian: Asas Proporsionalitas Dalam Kontrak Komersial. Jakarta: Kencana.
Hidayat, M. (2016). Strategi&Taktik Mediasi Berdasarkan Perma No.1 Tahun 2016 tentang Prosedur Mediasi Di Pengadilan. Jakarta: Kencana.
Mamonto, M. A. W., & Gani, A. W. (2022). Model of Political party Financial Regulation in Post-Reformation Indonesia. Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review (GRLSPR), 1(2), 76-85.
Mertokusumo, S. (1999). Mengenal Hukum. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
MP.Hutabarat, S. (2010). Penawaran dan Penerimaan Dalam Hukum Perjanjian. Jakarta: Grasindo.
Nugroho, S. A. (2019). Manfaat Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Jakarta: Prenamedia Group.
Parmitasari, I. (2019). Peran Penting Negosiasi Dalam Suatu Kontrak. Literasi Hukum. 3(2), 50-53.
Rahmah, D. M. (2019). Optimalisasi Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Mediasi Di Pengadilan. Bina Mulia Hukum. 4(1), 1-16.
Rumadan, I. (2017). Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Mediasi Di Pengadilan Negeri. Jakarta: Pudsat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hukum Dan Peradilan Badan Litbang Diklat Hukum Dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia.
Triana Dewi Seroja, A. S. (2020). Kekuatan Hukum Acta Van Dading Sebagai Hasil Kesepakatan Mediasi Dalam Gugatan Perdata. Hukum Untuk Mengatur Dan Melindungi Masyarakat.6 (3), 265-281.
Wiguna, M. O. (2018). Peluang Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata Tentang Tanah Melalui Alternatif Dispute Resolution. Masalah-Masalah Hukum. 47 (1), 47-55.
Yunanto. (2019). Hakikat Asas Pacta Sunt Servanda Dalam Sengketa Yang Dilandasi Perjanjian. Law,Development &Justice Review. 2(1), 33-47.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jasmaniar Jasmaniar, Nurhaedah Nurhaedah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH).
