Political Dynamics and Their Implications For the Constitutional Court

Authors

  • M. Iqbal Pratama National University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i3.3165

Keywords:

Constitutional Court, political dynamics, constitutional law

Abstract

The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia (MKRI) is a legal institution tasked with maintaining the applicability of the constitution and ensuring that the principles of the rule of law run well in the Indonesian government system. Since its establishment in 2003, the MKRI has become an important venue where legal and political issues often collide, especially in handling cases with major political impact, such as disputes over election results, challenges to laws and regulations, and the dissolution of political parties. The intensification of political dynamics poses a major challenge to the independence and credibility of the MKRI, especially amid political polarization and authorities' interference with legal institutions. This article analyzes in depth how changes in national politics affect the Constitutional Court's duties and functions. By using a legal approach grounded in norms and supported by a conceptual analysis of several MKRI decisions with political nuances, this study seeks to explain various forms of political influence on the MKRI's decision-making process. In addition, this article discusses strategic steps to strengthen the MKRI's independence amid intensifying political pressure. The results of the study show that political dynamics significantly affect the MKRI's performance and reputation. The MKRI's involvement in resolving political conflicts often puts him in a difficult position, namely between maintaining neutrality and meeting people's expectations of real justice. Therefore, continuous improvement is needed in the mechanism for recruiting judges, increased transparency in decisions, and strengthened public supervision of the constitutional judiciary's honesty.

References

Anggreni, D., Fuadi, A., Fitriyani, F., & Al-Kautsar, M. I. (2024). Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Menjamin Kedaulatan Hukum di Indonesia. Hutanasyah : Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara, 3(1), 11–26. https://doi.org/10.37092/hutanasyah.v3i1.868

Bagir Manan. (2023). Kekuasaan Kehakiman di Indonesia. FH UII Press.

Bivitri Susanti. (2022). Politik Hukum dan Independensi Kekuasaan Kehakiman. PSHK Press.

Christia, A. M., Wardhani, L. C., Tristy, M. T., & Surya, F. A. (2024). Politik Hukum Eksekusi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Di Indonesia. Lex Renaissance, 9(1), 62–84. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol9.iss1.art4

Christine S.T Kansil & Putri Meilika Nadilatasya. (n.d.). Dampak Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Terhadap Dinamika Politik dan Kepercayaan Publik di Indonesia: Analisis Implikasi Hukum dan Etika. UNES Law Review, 6(4).

Hukum Administrasi Negara dan Peradilan Administrasi. (n.d.).

Hukum Tata Negara. (n.d.).

I Dewa Gede Palguna. (2022). Mahkamah Konstitusi: Konstitusi dan Demokrasi. Rajawali Pers.

Jimly Asshiddiqie. (2023). Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.

Jimly Asshidiqie. (2022). Perihal Undang-Undang. Rajawali Pers.

Miriam Budiardjo. (2021). Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Politik. Gramedia.

Paradita, S. A., & Triadi, I. (2024). Analisis Perubahan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Konteks Pemilu 2024 Melalui Tinjauan Hukum Tata Negara: (Analysis of Changes in the Constitutional Court’s Decision in The Context of the 2024 Elections Through a Review of Constitutional Law). Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice, 1(4), 13. https://doi.org/10.47134/ijlj.v1i4.2349

Peter Mahmud Marzuki. (2022). Penelitian Hukum. Kencana.

Putusan Nomor 90/PUU-XXI/2023, 90/PUU-XXI/2023 (Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Oktober 2023). https://www.mkri.id/public/content/persidangan/putusan/putusan_mkri_9332_1697427438.pdf

Refly Harun. (2021). MK dalam Pusaran Politik. Pustaka Timur.

Salam, S. N. & Kurniasih. (2025). Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi terhadap Demokrasi di Indonesia: Studi Yuridis-Normatif. Perkara : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik, 3(1), 788–806. https://doi.org/10.51903/perkara.v3i1.2331

Sarmila Radjak, & Ahmad, A. (2025). Menguji Batas Kewenangan: Tafsir Mahkamah Konstitusi atas UUD 1945 dalam Dinamika Demokrasi Modern. Al-Zayn : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 3(3), 1800–1815. https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v3i3.1436

Sulistyowati & Dewi Nadya Maharani. (2024). Langkah Konstitusional Dalam Impeachment Presiden Di Indonesia. 10(1).

Sulistyowati, Maharani, D. N., Maharaja, G. B. M., & Carnely Kahe, A. M. (2024). Hubungan Pemerintah Dan Rakyat Dalam Perspektif Hukum Administrasi Negara. Journal of Indonesian Rural and Regional Government, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.47431/jirreg.v8i1.386

Sulistyowati, S., Maharani, D. N., Maharaja, G. B., & Manoppo, H. P. (2024a). Refleksi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi pada Pemilihan Presiden Tahun 2024 Terhadap Politik dan Demokrasi Indonesia. Qanuniya : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(1), 10–25. https://doi.org/10.15575/qanuniya.v1i1.826

Sulistyowati, S., Maharani, D. N., Maharaja, G. B., & Manoppo, H. P. (2024b). Refleksi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi pada Pemilihan Presiden Tahun 2024 Terhadap Politik dan Demokrasi Indonesia. Qanuniya : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(1), 10–25. https://doi.org/10.15575/qanuniya.v1i1.826

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945, UUD § Pasal 24C ayat (3) (1945).

Yuliana, A., Tuasalamony, A. A., Al Fath, Parhusip, A. D., Febriani, A., & Bakhtiar, H. S. (2024). ANALISIS TINGKAT KEPERCAYAAN PUBLIK TERHADAP MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI PASCA PUTUSAN NOMOR 90/PUU-XXI/2023. Jurnal Hukum Statuta, 3(2), 74–91. https://doi.org/10.35586/jhs.v3i2.9095

Downloads

Published

2026-04-10

How to Cite

M. Iqbal Pratama. (2026). Political Dynamics and Their Implications For the Constitutional Court. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 6(3), 2100–2113. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i3.3165