Legal Protection Against Copyright Infringement in Film Piracy: A Case Study of Cinema Recordings and Piracy on Digital Platforms. Constitutional Court Decision No. 84/PUU-XXI/2023
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i5.3179Keywords:
Legal Protection, Copyright, PiracyAbstract
This study examines legal protection against copyright infringement arising from film recording in cinemas and digital content piracy on digital platforms. The development of information technology has transformed the distribution of copyrighted works and increased the risk of infringement, both through illegal recording in public spaces and the unauthorized dissemination of exclusive subscription based content. This research aims to analyze the forms of legal protection against such infringements and to examine the juridical analysis of Constitutional Court Decision Number 84/PUU-XXI/2023 in the context of copyright violations in digital media and public spaces. The research method employed is normative and empirical legal research using statutory approaches, analysis of Constitutional Court decisions, and observation of digital piracy practices. The findings indicate that cinema camcording and unauthorized distribution of digital content constitute copyright infringement protected under Law Number 28 of 2014 on Copyright and related regulations. Constitutional Court Decision Number 84/PUU-XXI/2023 emphasizes that copyright protection must adapt to technological developments and reinforces the role of the state in regulating the protection of works in the digital environment. This study concludes that although the legal framework for copyright protection already exists, stronger supervision and more effective law enforcement are still required on an ongoing basis to address digital piracy challenges.
References
Bainbridge, D. (2012). Intellectual property (9th ed.). Pearson.
Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. Yale University Press.
Fisher, W. W. (2004). Promises to keep: Technology, law, and the future of entertainment. Stanford University Press.
Lessig, L. (2004). Free culture: How big media uses technology and the law to lock down culture and control creativity. Penguin Press.
Locke, J. (1690/1980). Second treatise of government. Hackett Publishing.
McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. McGraw-Hill.
Peraturan Bersama Menteri Hukum dan HAM dan Menteri Komunikasi dan Informatika Republik Indonesia Tahun 2015 tentang Penutupan Konten dan/atau Hak Akses Pengguna Pelanggaran Hak Cipta.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 84/PUU-XXI/2023.
Rahardjo, S. (2006). Ilmu hukum. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Tahrizi, H. (2019). Cross-platform piracy and digital content distribution. Journal of Digital Media Studies, 5(2), 45–60.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Venia Utami Keliat, Angel Pricillia Tak

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH).

























