Recognition of Customary Law in the Perspective of Legal Politics: A Study of Weak Legal Pluralism in Dayak Society

Authors

  • Aisyah Nurhalisha Mursyida Universitas Islam Negeri Palangka Raya
  • Surya Sukti Universitas Islam Negeri Palangka Raya
  • Mustar Universitas Islam Negeri Palangka Raya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i4.3200

Keywords:

Customary Law

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between legal pluralism and legal politics in the recognition of customary law in Indonesia, which remains conditional in practice. The background of this research lies in the diversity of legal systems in Indonesia that creates legal pluralism, while the state continues to exercise control through its legal policies. The novelty of this study is reflected in its critical analysis of the ambiguity of customary law recognition, particularly through the concept of weak legal pluralism as observed in the practices of Dayak indigenous communities in Kalimantan. This research employs a normative legal method using statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings reveal that although Article 18B paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution constitutionally recognizes indigenous peoples, such recognition is limited by the conditions “as long as they still exist” and “in accordance with the principles of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia,” which position customary law as subordinate to state law. In practice, customary law continues to function in dispute resolution but requires formal validation from the state. Therefore, a reorientation of legal politics is needed to ensure that the recognition of customary law is not merely formal but also substantive, providing greater autonomy to indigenous communities.

References

Efriani, Jagad Aditya Dewantara, Meliya Fransiska, Iwan Ramadhan, and Edy Agustinus. “EKSISTENSI ADAT DALAM KETERATURAN SOSIAL ETNIS DAYAK DI KAMPUNG BONSOR BINUA SAKANIS DAE.” Refreksi Hukum Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 6, no. 1 (2021). https://doi.org/https:// doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2021.v6.i1.p87-106.

Herawati, Arya Setya Novanto Ratna. “Efektivitas Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja Dalam Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia.” Jurnal USM Law Review 5, no. 1 (2022). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v5i1.5084.

Hidayatullah, Nana Yogatiyana Mohammad Arief. “EKSISTENSI HAK TANAH ULAYAT MASYARAKAT ADAT DALAM HUKUM TANAH DI INDONESIA.” ANWARUL : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Dakwah 2, no. 4 (2022). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.58578/anwarul.v2i4.505.

HilaireTegnan, SaldiIsra Ferdi. “Rule of Lawand Human Rights Challenges in South East Asia : A Case Study of Legal Pluralism in Indonesia.” Hasanuddin Law Review 3, no. 2 (2017). https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v3i2.1081.

Mujib, M.Misbahul. “Memahami Pluralisme Hukum Di Tengah Tradisi Unifikasi Hukum: Studi Atas Mekanisme.” Supremasi Hukum : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum 3, no. 1 (2014). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14421/sh.v3i1.1945.

Sihotang, Amri Panahatan, Dominikus Rato, and Wafda Vivid Izziyana. “Legal Status of Customary Communities, Customary Law Communities and Indigenous Communities as Custom Law Subjects.” Journal of Ecohumanism 3, no. 6 (2024). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i6.4128.

Suartina, Tine. “BETWEEN CONTROL AND EMPOWERMENT: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF ADAT COMMUNITIES AND ADAT VILLAGES IN INDONESIA.” Indonesia Law Review 10, no. 3 (2020). https://doi.org/10.15742/ilrev.v10n3.679.

Wardatun, Atun. “Egitimasi Berlapis Dan Negosiasi Dinamis Pada Pembayaran Perkawinan Perspektif Pluralisme Hukum Atun.” Al-Ahkam : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Islam 28, no. 2 (2018). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.21580/ahkam.2018.28.2.2438.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-01

How to Cite

Mursyida, A. N., Sukti, S., & Mustar, M. (2026). Recognition of Customary Law in the Perspective of Legal Politics: A Study of Weak Legal Pluralism in Dayak Society. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 6(4), 2287–2292. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i4.3200