The Implementation of Due Process of Law in Protecting Suspects’ Rights at the Investigation Stage in Indonesia

Authors

  • Sylvia Nanda Putri Master of Law Program, Universitas Islam Malang, Indonesia
  • Diyan Isnaeni Master of Law Program, Universitas Islam Malang, Indonesia
  • Moh. Muhibbin Master of Law Program, Universitas Islam Malang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i4.3262

Keywords:

Due process of law, suspects’ rights, criminal procedure law.

Abstract

This study examines the protection of suspects’ rights during the investigation process, which continues to reveal a gap between legal norms and practice. The objective is to analyze the implementation of the principle of due process of law in ensuring the protection of suspects’ rights at the investigation stage in Indonesia. A normative legal research method is employed using statutory and conceptual approaches with qualitative analysis. The findings indicate that although protection has been established through the Criminal Procedure Code and constitutional guarantees, its implementation remains influenced by an efficiency-oriented approach, weak oversight, and limited access to legal assistance. These conditions contribute to procedural violations such as coercive interrogation and wrongful suspect designation. Strengthening the principle of due process of law through criminal procedure reform, improved institutional accountability, and more active oversight mechanisms is therefore essential to achieve a fair criminal justice system that respects human rights.

References

Adnan, I. M. (2023). The conceptual and historical review of constitutional law in Indonesia. Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, 10(1), 43–63.

Amin, K. (2024). Perlindungan hukum terhadap penetapan status tersangka ditinjau dari perspektif hak asasi manusia. Journal of Sharia, 3(1), 1–18.

Anwary, I. (2023). Evaluation of the effectiveness of public administration policies in the development of stringent legal framework: An analysis of the criminal justice system in Indonesia. International Journal of Criminal Justice Science, 17(2), 312–323. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4756127

Arifin, A. (2023). Peran hakim dalam mewujudkan negara hukum Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Law Research, 1(1), 6–10.

Daharis, A., Herlina, S., Herwantono, Suningrat, N., & Rahman, Y. S. (2024). Hak-hak tersangka dan terdakwa dalam proses persidangan. Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains, 7(6), 2207–2214. https://doi.org/10.56338/jks.v7i6.5551

Firmansyah, S. H., & Farid, A. M. (2022). Politik hukum praperadilan sebagai lembaga perlindungan hak tersangka ditinjau dari putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 21/PUU-XII/2014 mengenai penetapan tersangka. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan, 3(2), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.18196/jphk.v3i2.15195

Haniyah. (2024). Rekonstruksi hukum kasus error in persona: Tantangan penegakan keadilan berdasarkan asas due process of law. Jurnal Reformasi Hukum, 28(3), 168–186.

Hidayat, M. F., Aritonang, R. V. D., & Lavea, H. (2024). Analisis asas ne bis in idem dalam hukum acara pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Kebijakan Publik, 1(2), 250–258.

Kurdi, A., Ardhan, A., & Dadek, T. A. (2026). Transformasi penegakan due process of law dalam tahapan penyidikan di Indonesia: Antara perlindungan hak tersangka dan efektivitas penegakan hukum. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 10(1), 33–45.

Matogu, F., & Rusmiati, E. (2023). Prinsip due process of law dalam ketentuan Pasal 29 Undang-Undang Nomor 46 Tahun 2009 tentang pengadilan tindak pidana korupsi. Jurnal Mercatoria, 16(2), 191–200.

Panjaitan, A. C. D. (2022). Ambivalensi kedudukan dan fungsi penyidikan hakim komisaris di RUU KUHAP dalam sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Pamator, 15(1), 18–32.

Putra, A. R., & Kartadipura, M. (2026). Power dynamics and decision-making practices in criminal case processing within the Indonesian justice system. Qriset Indonesia Journal of Law, 1(1), 1–10.

Santoso, W. A., Nasution, D. W., & Cornelis, V. I. (2026). Perlindungan hukum terhadap hak-hak tersangka dalam proses penyidikan di kepolisian. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business, 5(1), 83–90.

Sukmawan, Y. A., & Damayanti, D. (2025). Metode penelitian hukum normatif dan empiris sebagai strategi penguatan perspektif kajian ilmu hukum. Jurnal Hukum, 4(1), 114–128.

Sulubara, S. M., Basri, T. S., & Iskandar. (2024). Analisis konstitusional terhadap perlindungan hak asasi manusia dalam sistem hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Kabar Masyarakat, 2(4).

Thielgen, M. M., Schade, S., & Niegisch, P. (2022). Police officers’ interrogation expertise and major objectives in police service and training: A comprehensive overview of the literature. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.823179

Wardana, R., Arysepta, I., Mahbi, I., & Fuzain, N. A. (2025). Police authority abuse against freedom of expression: Case of Band Sukatani’s intimidation. Journal of Law and Society, 3(3), 225–238.

Wijaya, L. T. A., Jumadi, J., & Ashady, S. (2024). Tinjauan yuridis terhadap laporan korban tindak pidana yang tidak dilanjutkan ke tahap penuntutan berdasarkan prinsip due process of law. Juridische: Jurnal Penelitian, 2, 136–150.

Wowor, K. K., Sondakh, J., & Bawole, H. Y. A. (2025). Perlindungan hukum terhadap korban yang dijadikan tersangka oleh aparat penegak hukum. Innovative: Journal of Social Science Research, 5(6), 93–107.

Zamili, P. A. S. (2022). Kewenangan TNI Angkatan Laut dalam melakukan penyidikan tindak pidana illegal fishing (Studi di Pangkalan TNI AL Nias). Jurnal Panah Hukum, 1, 191–203.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-04

How to Cite

Sylvia Nanda Putri, Diyan Isnaeni, & Moh. Muhibbin. (2026). The Implementation of Due Process of Law in Protecting Suspects’ Rights at the Investigation Stage in Indonesia. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 6(4), 2605–2611. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i4.3262