Digital Checks and Balances: Strengthening Constitutional Stability through E-Oversight for Government Accountability

Authors

  • Doing Muhammad Universitas Panca Bhakti
  • Ali Bujang Universitas Panca Bhakti
  • Octaviani Dina Universitas Panca Bhakti

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i4.3271

Keywords:

Digital Check and Balances, E-Oversight, Constitutional Stability, Government Accountability, Digital Governance

Abstract

Strengthening the principle of checks and balances is a fundamental requirement for maintaining constitutional stability and ensuring government accountability. However, conventional oversight mechanisms still face various weaknesses, particularly in transparency, public participation, the effectiveness of detecting irregularities, and responding to developments in digital technology. This study aims to analyze the potential of E-Oversight as a digital oversight model to strengthen constitutional stability and enhance government accountability. This study uses qualitative legal methods with a juridical-normative and socio-legal approach. Data were collected through literature reviews, analyses of laws and regulations, reviews of policy documents, and interviews with relevant stakeholders. Data were analyzed descriptively and qualitatively by identifying legal norms, categorizing findings, and interpreting the relationship between digital oversight, accountability, and constitutional stability. The results show that conventional oversight systems are not fully effective in ensuring government accountability because they are still partial, administrative, and less responsive. Digitalization of oversight through E-Oversight has significant potential to increase transparency, expand public participation, accelerate the detection of irregularities, and strengthen oversight of government officials. However, the implementation of e-Oversight still faces obstacles, including limited digital infrastructure, suboptimal supporting regulations, low public digital literacy, and the need for a more comprehensive, integrated oversight system. This study concludes that e-Oversight can be a strategic instrument in strengthening digital checks and balances to support constitutional stability and government accountability. The implications of this study emphasize the need for strengthened regulations, integrated digital oversight platforms, increased digital literacy, and collaboration among the government, oversight institutions, and the public in building a transparent, participatory, and constitutional oversight system.

References

Ackerman, B. (2000). The new separation of powers. Harvard Law Review, 114(3), 634. https://doi.org/10.2307/1342286

Adam, I., & Fazekas, M. (2021). Are emerging technologies helping win the fight against corruption? A review of the state of evidence. Information Economics and Policy, 57, 100950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2021.100950

Al-Badi, A., Tarhini, A., & Khan, A. I. (2018). Exploring big data governance frameworks. Procedia Computer Science, 141, 271–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.10.181

Alessandro, M., Cardinale Lagomarsino, B., Scartascini, C., Streb, J., & Torrealday, J. (2021). Transparency and trust in government evidence from a survey experiment. World Development, 138, 105223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105223

Andria, Y., Ernawati, D. P., & Eliza, Y. (2023). Corruption and Governance Factors as The Determination of The Regional Government Revenue in Indonesia. Target: Jurnal Manajemen Dan Bisnis, 5(1), 109–116. https://doi.org/10.30812/target.v5i1.3041

Ariansyah, K., Muttaqin, M., Pusvita, V., Takariani, C. S. D., Darmanto, D., Budhirianto, S., & Nuryana, M. (2025). Revisiting e-government and public trust relationship: does higher maturity of e-government promote greater trust in public officials? Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 20(2), 374–394. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-07-2025-0219

Bannister, F., & Connolly, R. (2014). ICT, public values and transformative government: A framework and programme for research. Government Information Quarterly, 31(1), 119–128. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.06.002

Benmohamed, N., Shen, J., & Vlahu-Gjorgievska, E. (2024). Public value creation through the use of open government data in Australian public sector: A quantitative study from employees’ perspective. Government Information Quarterly, 41(2), 101930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2024.101930

Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010). Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), 264–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.001

Bunduchi, R., Sitar-Tăut, D. A., & Mican, D. (2025). A legitimacy-based explanation for user acceptance of controversial technologies: The case of Generative AI. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 215(March). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124095

Coman, E., Coman, C., Alexandrescu, M. B., & Bilți, R. S. (2025). Mapping the Frontiers of Cybersecurity and Data Protection: Insights from a Bibliometric Study. Electronics (Switzerland), 14(19), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14193769

Fadli Mappisabbi, Abd Haris, & Wahyudin Zuhri. (2025). Pengaruh Literasi Digital Masyarakat terhadap Efektivitas Partisipasi Publik dalam Governansi Digital. Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum, 1(1), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.59581/deposisi.v1i1.5238

Fung, A. (2015). Putting the Public Back into Governance: The Challenges of Citizen Participation and Its Future. Public Administration Review, 75(4), 513–522. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12361

Hafel, M. (2023). Digital Transformation in Politics and Governance in Indonesia: Opportunities and Challenges in the Era of Technological Disruption. Society, 11(2), 742–757. https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v11i2.577

Hanisch, M., Goldsby, C. M., Fabian, N. E., & Oehmichen, J. (2023). Digital governance: A conceptual framework and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 162(July 2022), 113777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113777

Heeks, R. (2006). Implementing and Managing eGovernment: An International Text. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446220191

Hood, C. (1991). A PUBLIC MANAGEMENT FOR ALL SEASONS? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x

Horneber, D., & Laumer, S. (2023). Algorithmic Accountability. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 65(6), 723–730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-023-00817-8

Hossin, M. A., Du, J., Mu, L., & Asante, I. O. (2023). Big Data-Driven Public Policy Decisions: Transformation Toward Smart Governance. SAGE Open, 13(4), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231215123

Huntua, H., Moonti, R. M., Bunga, M., & Kasim, M. A. (2025). Aliansi+Vol2+no3+Mei2025+hal+204-218. 2.

Janssen, M., & Estevez, E. (2013). Lean government and platform-based governance—Doing more with less. Government Information Quarterly, 30, S1–S8. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.11.003

Jonathan, G. M., Perjons, E., & Rusu, L. (2024). Digital Transformation-driven Decentralisation of Public Governance. Procedia Computer Science, 239, 1220–1229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.06.290

Judijanto, L., Persadha, P. D., Susilowati, I., Reza, H. K., & Susanti, M. (2025). Analisis Keamanan Data dan Perlindungan Privasi dalam Pengelolaan Big Data: Tinjauan Teknologi Enkripsi dan Anonimisasi. Jurnal Penelitian Inovatif, 5(2), 1991–2000. https://doi.org/10.54082/jupin.1151

Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Zoido-Lobatón, P. (1999). Policy Research Working Paper: Governance Matters. World Bank Institute Governance, Regulation and Finance. October 1999. http://www.worldbank.org/wbi/governance/working_papers.htm.

Kurniawan, N., & Putri, M. Ch. (2022). DIGITAL CONSTITUTIONALISM ERA IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF BANKING LAW IN INDONESIA. Journal of Central Banking Law and Institutions, 1(2), 431–454. https://doi.org/10.21098/jcli.v1i2.14

Lythreatis, S., Singh, S. K., & El-Kassar, A.-N. (2022). The digital divide: A review and future research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121359. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121359

Makanga, C. N., Orobia, L. A., Kaawaase, T. K., Nabeta, I. N., Mindra, R. K., & Munene, J. C. (2025). Accountability in public sector organizations: does ethical work climate matter? IIM Ranchi Journal of Management Studies, April, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1108/irjms-03-2025-0037

Maolani, D. Y., Nuraeni, A. S., Dellyani, A., & Al Huda, E. F. (2023). Penerapan Sistem Akuntabilitas Publik Dalam Mewujudkan Good Governance Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 21(2), 1–7. http://jurnaldialektika.com/

Marzuki, I. (2024). Korupsi sebagai Kejahatan Serius: Evaluasi Peran Lembaga Anti-Korupsi. Policy and Law Journal (Polaw), 1, 17.

Matheus, R., Janssen, M., & Janowski, T. (2021). Design principles for creating digital transparency in government. Government Information Quarterly, 38(1), 101550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101550

McDermott, R., Sagala, S., Susetyo, N. A., Insan, A., Harahap, W. D. P., Indrarini, A., & Azhari, D. (2025). The role of digital participation platforms in risk-informed development: A case study of Surabaya, Indonesia. Progress in Disaster Science, 26(May), 100430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2025.100430

Meijer, A. (2013). Understanding the Complex Dynamics of Transparency. Public Administration Review, 73(3), 429–439. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12032

Montesquieu, C. de S. baron de. (1989). Montesquieu’ “The Spirit of the Laws.” In A. M. Cohler, B. C. Miller, & H. S. Stone (Eds.), Montesquieu’ “The Spirit of the Laws.” Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.11288859

Mozin, S. Y., Abdullah, S., & Sawali, N. (2025). Pemanfaatan Teknologi Cerdas Untuk Pelayanan Publik: Study Tentang e-Government Dan Smart City Berbasis ICT Big Data Dan AI. JPS: Journal of Publicness Studies, 2(2), 117–130. https://jurnal.fisip.untad.ac.id/index.php/jps/article/view/1948

Munthohir, M. (2025). STRATEGI PENGAWASAN YANG EFEKTIF : JENIS DAN FUNGSI PENGAWASAN DALAM ORGANISASI MODERN. 02, 635–645.

Naher, N., Balabanova, D., Hutchinson, E., Marten, R., Hoque, R., Tune, S. N. B. K., Islam, B. Z., & Ahmed, S. M. (2020). Do social accountability approaches work? A review of the literature from selected low- and middle-income countries in the WHO South-East Asia region. Health Policy and Planning, 35(Supplement_1), i76–i96. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czaa107

Nam, T. (2012). Suggesting frameworks of citizen-sourcing via Government 2.0. Government Information Quarterly, 29(1), 12–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.07.005

Natsir, M. K. K., & Todinggara, M. T. (2025). Konstitusionalisme Digital: Membangun Kerangka Hukum untuk Tata Kelola Penyelenggaraan Negara di Era Teknologi. Terang : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Hukum, 2(3), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.62383/terang.v2i3.1286

Nurohmah, M. (2025). Akuntabilitas Publik Era Digital di Indonesia : Analisis Peluang dan Tantangan Public Accountability in Indonesia ’ s Digital Era : An Analysis of Opportunities and Challenges. Pena Bangsa: Bisnis Dan Tata Kelola Publik Adaptif, 1(2), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.69616/pb.v1i2.559

Peixoto, T., & Fox, J. (2016). OPENING Editors Duncan Edwards. 47(1).

Perdana, G. N. R., Arintyas, A. P. R. D. A., Syari, S. F., & Wilmantara, G. (2025). The Impact of E-Government on Social Inclusion: A Bibliometric Review of E-Inclusion Research. Journal Governance Dan Local Politic, 7(2), 202–218.

Pereira, S., Silva, C., & Ferreira, L. M. D. F. (2025). Barriers to energy transition: Comparing developing with developed countries. Energy for Sustainable Development, 87(February). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2025.101753

Pilon, M., & Brouard, F. (2023). Conceptualizing accountability as an integrated system of relationships, governance, and information. Financial Accountability & Management, 39(2), 421–446. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12323

Ramadhan, A. F., Tajudeen, F. P., & Jaafar, N. I. (2024). The Influence Factors of Data Governance Implementation: Study in Indonesian Public University. Procedia Computer Science, 234(2023), 1204–1211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.03.116

Rizka Vinanda, O., Setia Asih, S., Kusuma, S. R., Shapira Minata, B., Akbar, R., Gynansiar, I., Raden, U., & Lampung, I. (2025). Partisipasi Politik Masyarakat Sipil Dalam Pengawasan Kebijakan Publik Political Participation of Civil Society in Public Policy Monitoring. Jiic: Jurnal Intelek Insan Cendikia, 2(5), 10240–10247. https://jicnusantara.com/index.php/jiic

Rohayati, Y., & Abdillah, A. (2024). Digital Transformation for Era Society 5.0 and Resilience: Urgent Issues from Indonesia. Societies, 14(12), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc14120266

Saldanha, D. M. F., Dias, C. N., & Guillaumon, S. (2022). Transparency and accountability in digital public services: Learning from the Brazilian cases. Government Information Quarterly, 39(2), 101680. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101680

Shim, D. C., & Eom, T. H. (2008). E-Government and Anti-Corruption: Empirical Analysis of International Data. International Journal of Public Administration, 31(3), 298–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900690701590553

Siregar, M. A., Lubis, J. N., Siregar, P. G., & Sitompul, N. S. (2025). Dinamika Check & Balance Antar Lembaga Negara di Indonesia Pada Masa Periode Kedua Presiden Jokowi. Journal of Contemporary Law Studies, 2(4), 365–372. https://doi.org/10.47134/lawstudies.v2i4.4765

Tan, E., Mahula, S., & Crompvoets, J. (2022). Blockchain governance in the public sector: A conceptual framework for public management. Government Information Quarterly, 39(1), 101625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101625

Taufiq Hidayat, M., Sri Guntur, Y., & Penulis, K. (2025). Tranformasi Digital Melalui Implementasi E-Government Pada Organisasi Sektor Publik Fakuldade da Ekonomia Universidade da Paz Timor-Leste 2. Universitas, 31(2), 123–141.

Wujarso, R., Hakim, A. R., Faizah, N., Yasin, V., & Andhitiyara, R. (2025). Digital Transformation in Public Sector Institutions: A Systematic Literature Review and Comparative Country Analysis. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 17(4), 6219–6234. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v17i4.8765

Yulianti Mozin, S., Hasnawati Napu, F., Anggraini, M., Made Amanda, N., Rumampuk, F., & Abas, A. (2025). Big Data Dan Statistik: Transformasi Administrasi Publik Di Era Digital. Journal of Publicness Studies (JPS), 02(02), 95–104.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-04

How to Cite

Muhammad, D., Bujang, A., & Dina, O. (2026). Digital Checks and Balances: Strengthening Constitutional Stability through E-Oversight for Government Accountability. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 6(4), 2596–2604. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i4.3271