Dispute Resolution Of State-Owned Housing Occupied By The Deceased Occupant’S Spouse

Authors

  • Dedy Kurniawan Universitas Dr. Soetomo (Unitomo)
  • Sri Astutik University Dr. Soetomo (Unitomo)
  • Valencia Nadya Paramita University Dr. Soetomo (Unitomo)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i4.3305

Keywords:

State-Owned Houses; State-Owned Assets; Administrative Law; State Asset Disputes; Living Law.

Abstract

State-Owned Houses (RMN) are part of State-Owned Assets that function to support government administration and public services, and therefore their control falls under the regime of administrative law. In practice, the management of RMN often raises legal issues, particularly when official residences continue to be occupied by the widow of a deceased occupant after the lawful tenant has passed away. This situation creates disputes between the state as the asset owner and the occupant’s family, who emphasize social and humanitarian considerations. This study aims to analyze the legal status of RMN occupied by the widow of a deceased tenant and to examine the dispute resolution mechanisms in the context of protecting state assets fairly. The research employs normative legal methods with statutory and conceptual approaches, and analyzes legal materials qualitatively using a prescriptive-analytical method. The findings show that RMN cannot be inherited and may only be lawfully occupied based on valid administrative authorization, meaning that the widow of the deceased tenant has no legal basis to continue occupation without a new permit from the competent authority. Dispute resolution over RMN should be carried out gradually through administrative mechanisms, non-litigation processes, and litigation as the last resort. This study recommends consistent enforcement of administrative law, strengthening of measured administrative policies, and the provision of alternative social policies to ensure the protection of state assets without neglecting humanitarian values.

References

Asshiddiqie, J. (2006). Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press.

Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia. (2022). Pedoman Pengelolaan Barang Milik Negara. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Negara.

Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia. (2020). Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Republik Indonesia Nomor 115/PMK.06/2020 tentang Pemanfaatan Barang Milik Negara. Jakarta: Kementerian Keuangan RI.

Ombudsman Republik Indonesia. (2021). Laporan Tahunan Ombudsman Republik Indonesia. Jakarta: Ombudsman RI.

Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 27 Tahun 2014 tentang Pengelolaan Barang Milik Negara/Daerah sebagaimana telah diubah dengan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 28 Tahun 2020.

Putra, A., & Rahmawati, D. (2023). Sengketa penguasaan rumah dinas pasca meninggalnya penghuni dalam perspektif hukum administrasi negara. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 53(2), 245–262.

Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia No. 2664 K/Pdt/2020.

Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya No. 880/Pdt.G/2018.

Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Surabaya No. 564/Pdt/2019.

Rahardjo, S. (2009). Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Ridwan, H. R., & Sudarsono. (2021). Hukum Administrasi Negara dan Kebijakan Pelayanan Publik. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2004 tentang Perbendaharaan Negara.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan.

Wignjosoebroto, S. (2002). Hukum dalam Masyarakat. Jakarta: Elsam.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-07

How to Cite

Kurniawan, D., Astutik, S., & Paramita, V. N. (2026). Dispute Resolution Of State-Owned Housing Occupied By The Deceased Occupant’S Spouse . Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 6(4), 2706–2716. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i4.3305