The Implementation Of Fidic Standards And The Effectiveness Of Arbitration In Resolving Engineering, Procurement, And Construction (EPC) Contract Disputes In Indonesia: An Analysis Of The Dispute Between The Consortium Of PT Waskita Karya (Persero) Tbk-PT Jakarta Prima Cranes And PT Suprabari Mapanindo Mineral
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i4.3363Keywords:
Arbitration, FIDIC, Integrated Construction, Legal Certainty, Construction Dispute.Abstract
This study aims to analyze the provisions of the FIDIC Standard in Engineering, Procurement and Construction (EPC) integrated construction contracts in the dispute between the Consortium of PT Waskita Karya (Persero) Tbk–PT Jakarta Prima Cranes and PT Suprabari Mapanindo Mineral, as well as to examine the effectiveness of arbitration as a dispute resolution mechanism for FIDIC-based construction disputes in Indonesia. This research employs an empirical legal method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Data were collected through library research and document analysis related to the dispute and were analyzed qualitatively. The findings indicate that the FIDIC Standard in EPC contracts provides comprehensive provisions concerning risk allocation, claims procedures, variations, dispute resolution mechanisms, and the rights and obligations of the parties. However, its implementation in practice still encounters challenges regarding harmonization with national law, as there is no explicit regulation governing the legal status of FIDIC within the Indonesian legal system. The study further reveals that arbitration is a relatively effective dispute resolution mechanism due to its confidentiality, procedural flexibility, expertise of arbitrators, and the final and binding nature of arbitral awards. Nevertheless, its effectiveness is constrained by high costs, the complexity of technical evidence, and potential obstacles in enforcing arbitral awards. Therefore, clearer harmonization between FIDIC standards and Indonesian law is necessary to enhance legal certainty, justice, and the effectiveness of dispute resolution in integrated construction projects in Indonesia.
References
Abdul Kholiq. (2017). Affidavit saksi dalam perkara arbitrase No. 795/II/ARB-BANI/2016. Jakarta.
Arief, E., Hardjomuljadi, S., & Sami’an. (2025). Kepastian hukum penyelesaian sengketa kontrak konstruksi melalui arbitrase. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik, 5(4), 3031-3049.
Aristoteles. (2009). Nicomachean ethics (W. D. Ross, Trans.). Oxford University Press.
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2025). Indikator konstruksi triwulan I-2025. Badan Pusat Statistik.
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2025). Indikator konstruksi triwulan III-2025. Badan Pusat Statistik.
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2025). Indikator konstruksi triwulan IV-2024. Badan Pusat Statistik.
David Natanael Astrianto. (2017). Affidavit saksi dalam perkara arbitrase No. 795/II/ARB-BANI/2016. Jakarta.
Fédération Internationale des Ingénieurs-Conseils. (2017). Conditions of contract for EPC/Turnkey projects (2nd ed.). FIDIC.
Fédération Internationale des Ingénieurs-Conseils. (2019). FIDIC golden principles (1st ed.). FIDIC.
Fransiska, E., Saputro, A., Sami’an, & Hardjomuljadi, S. (2025). Penyelesaian sengketa konstruksi melalui arbitrase. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 6(2), 796-810.
Friedman, L. M. (1975). The legal system: A social science perspective. Russell Sage Foundation.
Goodpaster, G. (1995). Tinjauan terhadap penyelesaian sengketa. Dalam F. O. Soebagjo & E. Rajagukguk (Eds.), Arbitrase di Indonesia (hlm. 1-3). Ghalia Indonesia.
Gunawan, J. (2017). Pendapat hukum atau legal opinion dalam perkara arbitrase No. 795/II/ARB-BANI/2016. Bandung.
Hardjomuljadi, S. (2014). Manajemen klaim konstruksi FIDIC conditions of contract. Logoz Publishing.
Ilma, D. A. U. (2023). The mechanism of arbitration based on International Federation of Consulting Engineers (FIDIC) of construction project in Indonesia [Skripsi, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta].
Indahwati, A. N. (2025). Legal implications of extension of time in power plant construction projects: A comparative study of FIDIC and Indonesian law. SIGn Journal of Social Science, 6(2).
Irwan Wahidin. (2017). Keterangan saksi fakta PT Suprabari Mapanindo Mineral dalam perkara No. 795/II/ARB-BANI/2016. Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia.
Konsorsium PT Waskita Karya (Persero) Tbk dan PT Jakarta Prima Cranes melawan PT Suprabari Mapanindo Mineral. (2016). Replik dalam konpensi dan jawaban dalam rekonpensi perkara No. 795/II/ARB-BANI/2016. Jakarta.
Konsorsium PT Waskita Karya (Persero) Tbk dan PT Jakarta Prima Cranes melawan PT Suprabari Mapanindo Mineral. (2016). Replik dalam konpensi dan jawaban dalam rekonpensi perkara No. 795/II/ARB-BANI/2016: Dokumen lanjutan. Jakarta.
Konsorsium PT Waskita Karya (Persero) Tbk dan PT Jakarta Prima Cranes melawan PT Suprabari Mapanindo Mineral. (2016). Resume perkara No. 795/II/ARB-BANI/2016. Jakarta.
Konsorsium PT Waskita Karya (Persero) Tbk dan PT Jakarta Prima Cranes melawan PT Suprabari Mapanindo Mineral. (2016). Resume perkara No. 795/II/ARB-BANI/2016 dan pointers keterangan tambahan. Jakarta.
Kustiah, H., Hardjomuljadi, S., & Amin, M. (2022). Faktor pengaruh variation order pada konstruksi jalan dan jembatan untuk mengurangi klaim konstruksi. Jurnal Konstruksia, 13(2), 81-91.
Latada, H., Ashad, H., & Musa, R. (2022). Analisis penyelesaian sengketa jasa konstruksi pada proyek pembangunan Pasar Rakyat Pontolo Kabupaten Gorontalo. Jurnal Flyover, 2(1), 10-20.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Muskibah, M., & Hidayah, L. N. (2021). Penyelesaian sengketa konstruksi melalui arbitrase berdasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan. Pandecta Research Law Journal, 16(1), 14-26.
Nengah Sujana & Rekan Law Firm. (2016). Duplik dalam rekonpensi perkara No. 795/II/ARB-BANI/2016. Jakarta.
Nengah Sujana & Rekan Law Firm. (2017). Surat dan bukti tambahan kedua dalam perkara arbitrase No. 795/II/ARB-BANI/2016. Jakarta.
Permatasari, P. M. (2025). Praktik penyelesaian sengketa konstruksi di luar pengadilan. Rio Law Jurnal, 6(1).
Pertiwi, P. C., Nugroho, A. S. B., & Wibowo, R. A. (2024). Kajian putusan pengadilan yang membatalkan putusan arbitrase BANI pada sengketa kontrak jasa konstruksi. Teras Jurnal: Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 14(2), 468-484.
Puspa, A. W. (2016, September 8). BANI: Kasus sengketa sektor konstruksi paling tinggi. Bisnis.com.
Radbruch, G. (1950). Legal philosophy. Dalam The legal philosophies of Lask, Radbruch, and Dabin (K. Wilk, Trans.). Harvard University Press.
Republik Indonesia. (1999). Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia.
Republik Indonesia. (2015). Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2 Tahun 2015 tentang Tata Cara Penyelesaian Gugatan Sederhana. Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia.
Republik Indonesia. (2016). Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan. Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia.
Republik Indonesia. (2017). Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 tentang Jasa Konstruksi. Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia.
Republik Indonesia. (2020). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 22 Tahun 2020 tentang Peraturan Pelaksanaan Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 tentang Jasa Konstruksi. Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia.
Silitonga, D. (2024). EPC jadi inovasi dukung percepatan pembangunan infrastruktur. Buletin Konstruksi Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum, Edisi 2, 11-12.
Soekanto, S. (2008). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penegakan hukum. Rajawali Pers.
Soekanto, S. (2014). Pengantar penelitian hukum. UI Press.
Subekti, R. (2005). Hukum perjanjian. Intermasa.
Subekti, R., & Tjitrosudibio, R. (2009). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. Pradnya Paramita.
Sugandi, H., Sami’an, & Saputro, A. (2025). Efektivitas penyelesaian sengketa kontrak konstruksi di Indonesia dalam analisis hukum implementasi dan tantangan proyek infrastruktur. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 6(3), 1228-1239.
Sunggono, B. (2015). Metodologi penelitian hukum. Rajawali Pers.
Wati, D. L., dkk. (2024). Ketidaklengkapan kontrak dan sengketa konstruksi. Jurnal Mitra Teknik Sipil, 7(2), 489-502.
Yuniarti, S. (2017, February 28). Penyelesaian sengketa konstruksi pasca revisi UU Jasa Konstruksi. Business Law Binus.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Saibun Kasmadi Sirait, Diana Ria Winanti Napitupulu, Andrew Betlehn
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH).
