Punishment of Children as Perpetrators of Maltreatment Based on Restorative Justice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i3.343Keywords:
Crime of Violence against Children, Causing Serious Injury, Juvenile Criminal Justice SystemAbstract
The purpose of this study is to examine and analyze the application of criminal sanctions against children as perpetrators of restorative justice-based persecution in Semarang District Court Decision Number 5/Pid.Sus/Anak/2018/PN Smg. The method of approach in this writing is normative juridical. The specification of this research uses analytical descriptive. The data source uses secondary data. Data collection techniques using document studies. To analyze the data, researchers used qualitative analysis methods. The judge in deciding the case of maltreatment committed by a child against a child resulting in serious injury with a restorative justice approach in the Semarang District Court Decision Number 5/Pid.Sus/Anak/ 2018/PN Smg which states that the Defendant ARNES POLINUS SILALAHI alias ARPOL BIN J. SILALAHI is legally and convincingly proven guilty of committing the crime of "Participating in violence against children resulting in injury" as regulated and punishable in Article 80 paragraph (2) of Law Number 35 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection is correct. This is in accordance with the charges of the Public Prosecutor and has been based on the facts in the trial, as well as the evidence submitted by the Public Prosecutor in the form of testimony from witnesses that are in accordance with the results of the Visum Et Repertum. And the defendant is considered physically and mentally healthy so that he is considered capable of taking responsibility for his actions. In addition, the legal considerations of the Judge in imposing punishment against the defendant of the crime of violence against children which resulted in serious injury were also appropriate. The judge sentenced the defendant ARNES POLINUS SILALAHI alias ARPOL BIN J. SILALAHI to 5 (five) months imprisonment. The judge has considered both from a juridical point of view, the facts in the trial, the testimony of witnesses, existing evidence, and based on the conviction of the judge.
References
Arief, H., & Ambarsari, N. (2018). Penerapan Prinsip Restorative Justice Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia. Jurnal Al’Adl, 10(2).
Ernis, Y. (2017). Diversi Dan Keadilan Restoratif Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana Anak Di Indonesia (Diversion And Restorative Justice In Case Settlement Of Juvenile Justice System In Indonesia). Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum, 10(2), 163–174.
Gultom, Maidin. (2012). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Di Indonesia. Refika Aditama.
Hambali, A. R. (2019). Penerapan Diversi Terhadap Anak Yang Berhadapan dengan Hukum Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana (Diversions for Children in Conflict with The Laws in The Criminal Justice System). Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 13(1), 15–30.
Handoko, D. (2015). Kekuasaan Kehakiman Di Indonesia. Hawa dan Ahwa.
Marlina. (2012). Peradilan Pidana Anak di Indonesia Pengembangan Konsep Diversi dan Restorative justice. Refika Aditama.
Marzuki, P. M. (2014). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Meyrina, S. A. (2017). Restorative Justice dalam Peradilan Anak Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No.11 Tahun 2012. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 17(1).
Muladi. (2019). Implementasipendekatan “Restorative Justice”Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana, 2(2).
Nashriana. (2013). Perlindungan Hukum Pidana Bagi Anak Di Indonesia. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Senen, Z. A. (2021). Rekonseptulisasi Penegakkan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku dan Korban Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik Berbasis Restorative Justice. Lex Renaissan, 6(2), 265–279.
Siregar, B. (2010). Telaah Tentang Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak dan Wanita. . Pusat Studi Kriminologi Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia.
Surbakti, N. (2011). Mediasi Penal Sebagai Terobosan Alternatif Perlindungan Hak Korban Tindak Pidana. . Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 14(1).
Wagiu, J. D. (2015). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Asas Keadilan Restoratif Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Penggelapan. Lex Crimen, 4(1), 57–70.
Yusuf, A. (2016). Implementasi Restorative Justice Dalam Penegakan Hukum Oleh Polri Demi Mewujudkan Keadilan Substantif. Penerbit Universitas Tri Sakti.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Chika Afifah Suwandi , Aidul Fitriciada Azhari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities (JLPH).